The effectiveness of nucleus breeding schemes based on multiple ovulation and embryo transfer in practice is highly dependent upon the achieved reproductive rate. This study quantifies the effects of donor cow variability in response to superovulation (random and phenotypically correlated with milk yield) and failure rates (proportion of selected cows producing no transferable embryos) on the mean and variance of realized female selection differentials as affected by herd size, average embryo yield, and the coefficient of variation for embryo yield. Results show that differences in failure rates (0 to 40%) reduced realized female selection differentials up to 64%. The existence of a negative phenotypic correlation (-.3) between donor cow embryo yield and milk yield caused smaller reductions (up to 19%). Variability in realized female selection differentials is largest for small nucleus units and should not be neglected when planning the establishment of a nucleus breeding unit. The use of multiple flushes rather than a single flush per cow to produce the same average number of transferable embryos can reduce the variability in realized selection differentials but increases generation interval. Variability in response to superovulation will also affect inbreeding rates and the average accuracy of selection. Simulation studies are needed to quantify the total effect of variability in response to superovulation on the genetic responses possible in nucleus breeding schemes relying on multiple ovulation and embryo transfer.
Repeated cloning of bovine embryos by nuclear transfer, producing large clones of monozygous animals, may be possible in the future. Initially, clones could be tested and the best one selected and spread over the commercial population by embryo transfer. Further genetic improvement could be obtained by rebreeding a number of the best clones to produce a new set of clones. However, the testing and selection systems to pick the best clone (for short-term clonal response) and to pick clones with the best breeding values (for long-term genetic response) are different. The objective of this study was to derive a system which achieves both high clonal and high genetic responses. An adult MOET (multiple ovulation and embryo transfer) scheme with 40 breeding males and 40 breeding females per generation (cycle) was used to maintain adequate genetic variation for continued genetic response. For a fixed set of testing facilities and a given family structure initial clonal response is maximized by testing several members per clone. Long-term genetic response is usually greatest when testing one member per clone. Compromises to obtain both high clonal response and high genetic responses were from 95 to 100% efficient.
Theoretical rates of annual genetic responses to selection in beef cattle were compared for conventional and multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) breeding schemes. Several combinations of replacement policy, mating ratio and type of selection were considered for both schemes with low, medium and high heritabilities. For MOET, four rates of embryo transfers per donor were used to represent low to moderate MOET levels. The results indicated that annual genetic responses to selection could be up to 1.3, 1.6 and 1.8 times as great for MOET compared with conventional breeding for traits of low, medium and high heritability, respectively; however, the annual inbreeding rates also were high for the MOET schemes considered. Embryo splitting, or cloning, was shown to increase accuracy of selection by 8 to 35% through the production of identical genotypes. The use of MOET in conjunction with embryo splitting in elite nucleus units could substantially increase genetic improvement for traits with low, medium and high heritabilities in beef cattle populations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.