No abstract

The validity of peak expiratory flow (PEF) recordings and the sensitivity of PEF variability indices in asthma and asthma-like conditions were examined in an adolescent population. Recordings from 245 randomly selected subjects and from an additional 181 subjects reporting or considered at risk for developing asthma were analyzed. Subjects recorded PEF twice daily for 2 wk using Mini-Wright meters, completed a symptoms questionnaire, and were tested for airway responsiveness to methacholine. The first three recording days showed significant accumulation of lowest PEF values recorded (41%) and were excluded from further analysis. Among nine PEF variability indices, the Two-lowest%mean (the mean of the two lowest PEF values as a percentage of the period mean) had the best sensitivity for physician-diagnosed asthma (28%). The sensitivity of the methacholine dose-response slope (DRS) was 69%. Combining these indices, a sensitivity of 77% for diagnosed asthma was obtained. Among subjects with asthma-like symptoms but no diagnosis of asthma, 14% had increased Two-lowest%mean and the DRS was increased in 17%, but only 3% were identified by both tests. In conclusion, inhomogeneity of PEF data could be corrected by disregarding the first three recording days. PEF variability indices identified some diagnosed asthmatics, and particularly some symptomatic "nonasthmatics," not identified by the DRS, suggesting that the combined use of these indices might be helpful.

In the present population-based study, spirometric lung function was assessed in symptomatic schoolchildren with and without asthma as compared to an asymptomatic reference group. The primary aim was to investigate if impaired lung function could be demonstrated in symptomatic schoolchildren, even in the absence of diagnosed asthma. Spirometry [forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), 50% of forced expiratory flow (FEF 50%) and 75% of forced expiratory flow (FEF 75%)] and anthropometric measures (standing height, weight, skin fold thickness, and length and circumference of the upper arm) were obtained from 1369 8-10-year-old children (81.5% of the eligible population) during the school year 1985-86. In 1321 of those subjects (96.5% of those examined), a self-administered questionnaire was completed. Thirty-five children belonging to ethnic minorities were excluded, thus 1286 subjects were included for further analysis. Point prevalences concerning asthma and respiratory symptoms (wheeze, cough and shortness of breath) were obtained. Thirty-seven children reported asthma and one or more asthma-like symptoms (symptomatic asthmatics), whereas 40 children denied having asthma, although claiming one or more asthma-like symptoms (symptomatic non-asthmatics). In both symptomatic groups, FEF 50% and FEF 75% were reduced relative to the reference group, the deficit being larger in the symptomatic asthmatics. FEF 75% was found to be more reduced than FEF 50%. FEV1 and FVC did not differ significantly between groups. It is concluded that only half of the schoolchildren with respiratory symptoms usually associated with the presence of asthma actually reported having this disease. These results demonstrate the presence of reduced lung function in symptomatic, reportedly non-asthmatic, children, suggesting clinically important underdiagnosis of asthma. More severe impairment of lung function was found in known asthmatics, also implying some degree of undertreatment.