The results of research into the water relations of cocoa are reviewed in the context of drought mitigation and irrigation need. Background information on the centres of production of the cocoa tree, and the role of water in crop development and growth processes, is followed by reviews of the effects of water stress on stomatal conductance, leaf water status and gas exchange, together with drought tolerance, crop water use and water productivity. Leaf and shoot growth occur in a series of flushes, which are synchronized by the start of the rains following a dry season (or an increase in temperature), alternating with periods of 'dormancy'. Flowering is inhibited by water stress but synchronous flowering occurs soon after the dry season ends. Roots too grow in a rhythmic pattern similar to that of leaf flushes. Roots can reach depths of 1.5-2.0 m, but with a mass of roots in the top 0.2-0.4 m, and spread laterally >5 m from the stem. Stomata open in low light intensities and remain fully open in full sunlight in well-watered plants. Partial stomatal closure begins at a leaf water potential of about −1.5 MPa. Stomatal conductance is sensitive to dry air, declining as the saturation deficit increases from about 1.0 up to 3.5 kPa. Net photosynthesis and transpiration both consequently decline over a similar range of values. Little has been published on the actual water use of cocoa in the field. Measured ETc values equate to <2 mm d −1 only, whereas computed ETc rates of 3-6 mm d −1 in the rains and <2 mm d −1 in the dry season have also been reported. Despite its sensitivity to water stress, there is too a paucity of reliable, field-based published data of practical value on the yield responses of cocoa to drought or to irrigation. With the threat of climate change leading to less, or more erratic, rainfall in the tropics, uncertainty in yield forecasting as a result of water stress will increase. Social, technical and economic issues influencing the research agenda are discussed.

No abstract

No abstract

Four trials were carried out to investigate the effect of inter-plot competition on seed yield and plant height of field beans using experimental designs balanced for neighbours. One trial tested four varieties ranging in final height from 25 to 100 cm and sown in four-row plots with 30 cm spacing between rows and one blank row between plots. When grown between plots of a dwarf variety, the plot yield of the tallest variety was increased by 20 % compared with its pure stand yield: a complementary reduction in yield was shown by the dwarf variety when grown between plots of the tall. The effect on the yield of the inner rows of the plot was somewhat smaller than that of the outer rows but still significant. Another trial with six commercial varieties differing in final height by less than 15 cm showed no differential effects of inter-varietal competition on yield. In two trials with six varieties of widely differing heights planted with 50 cm spacing between rows, but no gap between plots, plot yield was strongly affected by the neighbouring variety in the trial with single-row plots, while yields from the fourrow trial showed a large interaction between variety and inner and outer row position, again indicative of inter-variety competition. The yield response to competition could be described by a common linear regression on the excess height of plot neighbours: there was little evidence of varietal differences in sensitivity or aggressiveness.Plant height showed a positive response to height of plot neighbours in all four trials, whilst in the single-row trial, the ratio of grain yield to total dry-matter production (harvest index) was negatively related to excess height of neighbours.The results suggest that, when testing varieties differing in height by more than 20 cm, at least two buffer rows, e.g. six-row plots with the centre two rows harvested, are required to obtain a true comparison of pure-stand yield. Alternatively, when this procedure would result in an unacceptable use of resources, one of the statistical models adapted in this paper may be used to adjust variety yields for pure stands.

No abstract

Objectives Nutraceuticals are components of dietary origin, with claimed beneficial therapeutic activities. The quality of nutraceuticals is paramount for efficacy and safety, and it includes quality of raw materials, different available chemical forms, complex products, lack of substitution of inappropriate materials, and the absence of contaminants. The aim of this review is to investigate the extent of substandard formulated and raw material nutraceuticals, and to highlight any consequent health concern. Key findings Reports of the quality of raw materials have revealed wide variations, often as a result of lack of clear regulatory definitions with respect to size of polymeric entities and also presence of glycosidic and salt forms. Published evaluations of over 70 formulations of 25 different nutraceuticals revealed variable quality; no nutraceutical showed consistent high quality, but a number revealed consistent low quality, thereby making the case for closer regulation of manufacturers. Whole food sources have also been shown to be widely variable in constituent levels. The effect of different formulations requires consideration, as the different types have been shown to have marked effects on bioavailability. Summary The poor quality of commercially available nutraceuticals has been highlighted. In addition, incidences of side effects and drug interactions are increasing, as consumption of nutraceuticals rises. Pharmacists and health practitioners need to be aware of the scientific literature to advise accordingly.

No abstract

No abstract