Objective: To evaluate the value of maternal serum CA125 and CA15-3 concentrations for discriminating pathological from normal pregnancies. Methods: Serum samples from 120 women, in whom pregnancy outcome was pathological, i.e. spontaneous abortion, fetal death, intrauterine growth retardation, chromosomal and structural abnormalities, and (pre)eclampsia, were assessed for CA125 and CA15-3 and compared with levels found in 350 women with a normal pregnancy outcome matched for age and duration of pregnancy. Results: Maternal CA125 serum values were significantly higher in the first and the third trimester of pregnancy (median 23.0 and 21.0 U/ml; p < 0.00001 and p < 0.001, respectively), compared to those in the second trimester (median 14.0 U/ml), but not significantly different from those obtained in pathological pregnancies. Maternal serum CA15-3 values were significantly higher during the third trimester (median 26.0 U/ml) compared to the first and second trimester of pregnancy (median 14.0 and 15.0 U/ml; p < 0.0001); CA15-3 serum levels in normal and pathological pregnancies showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Maternal serum levels of CA125 are higher during the first and third trimester of pregnancy. CA15-3 maternal serum levels are higher during the third trimester compared to the first and second trimester. Maternal CA125 and CA15-3 serum levels showed no relation with a pathological outcome of pregnancy.
Summary Serum CA 125 regression after cytoreductive surgery and during the first three courses of chemotherapy was studied in 60 ovarian cancer patients and compared to known prognostic factors.Various methods reported in the literature to calculate a CA 125 half-life value were compared. Using two exponential regression models (Van der Burg et al., 1988;Buller et al., 1991), mean half-lives in stage I-II patients after complete cytoreductive surgery were respectively 10.7 days (range: 5-23) and 9.8 days (range: 7-15). Within stage III-IV patients, a significant positive correlation was seen between survival and (a) stage III (P = 0.002), (b) residual tumour 1 cm (P = 0.02), (c) CA 125 normalisation after three courses (P = 0.003) and (d) CA 125 half-life < 20 days (P = 0.02-0.004, depending on the method used for half-life calculation).The median survival times of patients with and without a CA 125 normalisation after three courses were 27 and 14 months respectively (P = 0.003). When
In the search for a method to facilitate the preoperative discrimination of ovarian carcinomas from colorectal carcinomas serum levels of 6 tumor markers were measured in 47 patients presenting with ovarian cancer and compared to levels found in 24 female patients with advanced, untreated colorectal cancer. The markers studied were CA 125, CA 15.3, CA 19.9, CEA and two recently developed mucin markers, CA M29 and CA M26. Levels of CA 125, CA 15.3, CEA and CA M29 showed significant differences between both groups. In predicting ovarian cancer, sensitivity was highest for CA 125 at 94% (35 U/ml cutoff level). However, the specificity of CA 125 was at 71% low. Specificity increased significantly by using a combination of a CA 125-positive score ( > 35 U/ml) and a simultaneous negative CEA score (≤ 5 ng/ml) (specificity 100%, sensitivity 81 %). A CA 125/CEA serum ratio > 25 resulted in the highest discriminative power with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 91 % resulting in an overall test accuracy of 94%. It is concluded that the serum tumor markers used, especially a combination of CA 125 and CEA, are helpful in the preoperative differential diagnosis between adenocarcinomas of ovarian and colorectal origin.
Two recently developed monoclonal antibody (MAb)-based anti-mucin assays, CA M26 and CA M29, were studied in 250 cancer patients and compared to 3 well-established marker tests, viz., CA 125, CA 15.3 and SCC, in order to assess their clinical usefulness as serum tumor markers. Pre-treatment sera were obtained from patients with predominantly low-stage epithelial malignancies comprising 200 adenocarcinomas (of the ovary, endometrium, breast and large intestine) and 50 squamous-cell carcinomas (of the uterine cervix). Pretreatment sera of 50 patients with benign ovarian tumors were included to evaluate levels in benign disease, CA M26 and CA M29 cut-off levels were established in 89 healthy controls. In patients with adenocarcinomas, overall positivity for CA M29 was 24%, ranging from 10% in breast cancer to 60% in ovarian cancer. Overall positivity was highest for CA 125 (30%) and lowest for CA M26 (18%) with CA M29 (24%) being similar to CA 15.3 (25%). In adenocarcinomas the combined CA M26-CA M29 assays equalled results obtained with the CA 125-CA 15.3 combination (33% vs. 36%). Elevation of 2 or more markers was highly indicative of advanced disease (p less than 0.025). A majority of positive patients showed either CA M26 or CA M29 elevations, indicating that both antibodies detect distinct epitopes. After adjustment for tumor site and stage, the profile of CA M26 as a single marker differed significantly from the profiles of CA 125 and of CA M29. CA M26 was frequently (32%) elevated in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the cervix and CA M26 levels were often independently elevated. CA M26 seems to be valuable as an additional marker in breast cancer and perhaps as a new marker in cervical cancer. CA M29 may be useful in ovarian cancer in addition to CA 125.
The technical performance and clinical usefulness of the newly developed Enzymun-Test CA 125 (Boehringer Mannheim) was evaluated in a multicenter study. Sera tested were obtained from healthy control subjects (n = 1003) and from patients with benign conditions (379), ovarian cancer (518), or other malignancies (479). Intra- and interassay variability was low at CA 125 concentrations greater than 100 units/mL. Intra- and interassay CVs were respectively less than or equal to 36% and 23% for the low CA 125 concentrations (less than or equal to 35 units/mL) and less than or equal to 15% and 14% for the medium CA 125 concentrations (36- less than or equal to 100 units/mL). Interlaboratory reproducibility of the Enzymun-Test CA 125 was excellent. A strong linear correlation was observed between Enzymun-Test CA 125 and three of four other commercially available assays of CA 125 in serum. Cutoff values of 35 units/mL in three of these other tests corresponded to Enzymun-Test CA 125 values ranging from 27.0 to 42.1 units/mL. In the fourth test, an enzyme immunoassay, a cutoff of 35 units/mL corresponded to Enzymun-Test values ranging from 64.1 to 77.0 units/mL. Discordant, as yet unexplained, results in which Enzymun-Test values were greater than 65 units/mL and Centocor CA 125 immunoradiometric assay results were less than 35 units/mL were found in 15 of 1003 samples (1.5%) of apparently healthy control subjects. Sensitivity and performance of the Enzymun-Test were very similar to those of the Centocor assay for sera from the patients with various benign disorders or malignant diseases. Given its excellent automated technical performance, this new CA 125 serum assay is feasible for monitoring ovarian cancer patients. Test results are interchangeable with those from other laboratories and, in general, with those obtained by most other CA 125 tests.
The mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen (MCA) enzyme immunoassay was tested in 962 healthy controls. MCA levels were compared with CA 125 in 70 patients with benign and 76 with malignant ovarian tumors. In addition MCA was compared with CA 15.3 in 58 patients with breast cancer and with CEA in 50 patients with colon carcinoma. In healthy controls the 95th percentile cutoff of 19.2 U/ml appeared to be higher than generally used. With the common cutoff value of 14 U/ml, a 38% sensitivity and 100% specificity was reached in malignant versus benign ovarian tumors. In colorectal cancer only 4% of patients had elevated MCA serum levels (CEA: 50%). In breast cancer patients the MCA assay performed better than CA 15.3 although only 17.2% showed elevated levels (CA 15.3:7.4%). Thus MCA seems to be of limited value in the diagnosis and follow-up of adenocarcinomas of breast, ovary or colon.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.