1993
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CA 125 half-life in ovarian cancer: a multivariate survival analysis

Abstract: Summary Serum CA 125 regression after cytoreductive surgery and during the first three courses of chemotherapy was studied in 60 ovarian cancer patients and compared to known prognostic factors.Various methods reported in the literature to calculate a CA 125 half-life value were compared. Using two exponential regression models (Van der Burg et al., 1988;Buller et al., 1991), mean half-lives in stage I-II patients after complete cytoreductive surgery were respectively 10.7 days (range: 5-23) and 9.8 days (rang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
33
2
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
33
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The CA125 antigen became an established marker, nowadays commonly used in gynaecological practice for management of patients with ovarian cancer. 2,3 In the original Centocor CA125 assay (Fujirebio Diagnostics, Malvern, USA), a homologous doubledeterminant assay, the OC125 MAb was used both as capture and tracer antibody. Therefore, repetition of the antibody-de¢ned epitope on the CA125 antigen is mandatory for binding and detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CA125 antigen became an established marker, nowadays commonly used in gynaecological practice for management of patients with ovarian cancer. 2,3 In the original Centocor CA125 assay (Fujirebio Diagnostics, Malvern, USA), a homologous doubledeterminant assay, the OC125 MAb was used both as capture and tracer antibody. Therefore, repetition of the antibody-de¢ned epitope on the CA125 antigen is mandatory for binding and detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demand is at the basis of the development of biological markers of cancer called tumor markers (TM) [2,10,11]. The range of measurable tumor markers expand day by day, although some of them are not discriminative of a benign or malignant process, their utility remains considerable in the assessment of therapeutic effect and the surveillance of the disease evolution after treatment [10,8,11,12]. The Interpretation of the serum levels of TM is based on the kinetics' notion is more sensitive and relevant than that based on the static threshold [5,9,11], the later value of which is neither adapted to the nature of the treatment nor the precocity of the signal even the assay reagents used as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of tumor markers remains essential in the detection and following of the disease evolution [8,11,12] . However, the interpretation of these serum levels based on a single value does not make it possible to evaluate either the efficacy of the treatments or the resistance of the tumor [4,5,9,10,11], henceforth the benefit of the use of a relevant method based on the " Study of the kinetics of the tumor markers [5,10,11] which makes it possible to ensure both a maximum of therapeutic efficacy and a minimum biological reagents use and the cancer chemotherapy whose cost remains very expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When serum tumor marker levels do not normalize after treatment, the existence of residual tumor cells is strongly suspected. [1][2][3][4][5][6] After surgical resection of tumors, serum tumor marker levels decrease in accordance with their individual elimination kinetics to a certain plateau level, [6][7][8][9][10] which is determined by the amount of postoperative tumor marker-producing cells remaining. These remaining tumor marker-producing cells may consist in part of residual tumor cells when the plateau level is higher than the normal range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%