No abstract

This review analysis consists of the antitumor activity and toxic deaths reported in single agent Phase I clinical trials using cytotoxic compounds published from 1972 to 1987. A total of 6639 patients with a variety of solid tumors and hematological malignancies were accrued in 211 trials studying 87 compounds. The median number of patients per trial was 28 (range: 7-111) and the median of the median ages reported in the individual trial was 56 (range of individual age: 2 to 93 years). Ten percent of the trials enrolled pediatric patients (less than 18 years), but the exact numbers of children were not always given or separated from the adult patients. Nine percent of the patients had received no prior treatment, 75% were pretreated either with chemotherapy alone (50%) or radio- plus chemotherapy (25%). Radiotherapy alone was administered to 11% of the patients and the remaining 5% of the patients received prior treatments which was not specified. The most frequent tumor types were those of the gastrointestinal tract (22%) and the respiratory tract (19%). The frequency of the remaining malignancies was less than 10% of all patients. There were 23 (0.3%) complete responders and 279 (4.2%) partial responders for an overall response rate of 4.5% among all entries. Toxic deaths were rare and reported in only 31 patients (0.5% of the entire population). Responses were usually observed in chemosensitive tumor types. Despite a low response rate reported during the first phase of cytotoxic drug development, the present analysis shows that some therapeutic benefit can be achieved.

Systematic on-site initiation visits did not contribute significantly to this clinical trial.

BackgroundIn respect of the principle of autonomy and the right of self-determination, obtaining an informed consent of potential participants before their inclusion in a study is a fundamental ethical obligation. The variations in national laws, regulations, and cultures contribute to complex informed consent documents for patients participating in clinical trials. Currently, only few ethics committees seem willing to address the complexity and the length of these documents and to request investigators and sponsors to revise them in a way to make them understandable for potential participants. The purpose of this work is to focus on the written information in the informed consent documentation for drug development clinical trials and suggests (i) to distinguish between necessary and not essential information, (ii) to define the optimal format allowing the best legibility of those documents.MethodsThe Aide et Recherche en Cancérologie Digestive (ARCAD) Group, an international scientific committee involving oncologists from all over the world, addressed these issues and developed and uniformly accepted a simplified informed consent documentation for future clinical research.ResultsA simplified form of informed consent with the leading part of 1200–1800 words containing all of the key information necessary to meet ethical and regulatory requirements and ‘relevant supportive information appendix’ of 2000–3000 words is provided.ConclusionsThis position paper, on the basis of the ARCAD Group experts discussions, proposes our informed consent model and the rationale for its content.

Sixty-three evaluable patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive three-week intravenous courses of carminomycin (18 mg/m2) or 4'-epidoxorubicin (90 mg/m2). The former yielded one (3%) partial response for nine weeks among 29 patients whereas, in the other arm, nine (27%) of 34 patients achieved partial response for a median of 28 weeks (range, nine to 36 weeks; p less than 0.02). The major toxic effect of these anthracyclines was leukopenia with median white blood cell nadirs of 1,600/microL (range, 300-4,000/microL) versus 1,800/microL (range, 500-4,300/microL), respectively. Acute nonhematologic toxic effects were qualitatively similar but carminomycin produced significantly less gastrointestinal intolerance and alopecia. Patients whose disease failed to respond to first-line anthracycline received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) every three weeks. Four partial responses were obtained among 19 patients previously treated with carminomycin. Following 4'-epidoxorubicin therapy, one of 12 evaluable patients also attained partial response. Survival curves were not affected by the initial treatment option. Carminomycin has marginal activity against breast cancer whereas 4'-epidoxorubicin deserves further evaluation of its therapeutic index relative to doxorubicin. The design used in this trial appears attractive for prompt phase II evaluation of anthracycline analogs.