During the study period, 10,675 human ophthalmic specimens were received at The Henry C. Witelson Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory and Registry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Of those, 271 were conjunctival lesions (2.5%), with 101 being classified as melanocytic: 50 (49.5%) nevi, 36 (35.6%) primary acquired melanoses, and 15 (14.9%) melanomas. After exclusion of referred cases, 85 lesions were included in the study: 44 (51.7%) nevi, 33 (38.8%) primary acquired melanoses, and 8 (9.4%) melanomas. The most prevalent location was the bulbar conjunctiva. Conjunctival melanomas were most commonly found in an older age group than primary acquired melanosis or nevi. Conjunctival nevi were subdivided into compound (32.9%), subepithelial (16.4%), and junctional (2.3%). Primary acquired melanosis were further classified into primary acquired melanosis with atypia (8.2%) and primary acquired melanosis without atypia (30.5%). Primary acquired melanoses was the predisposing lesion in 75% of the cases of melanoma. In our sample, referral bias could alter the distribution of conjunctival pigmented lesions, with a shift toward the malignant end.

Acquired conjunctival melanocytic lesions include nevi, primary acquired melanoses (PAMs), and melanomas. Conjunctival melanoma is a malignant melanocytic neoplasm with a high metastasis and mortality rate. Usually, the diagnosis can be achieved only with routine microscopic analysis, but in some cases, the samples are small or have artifacts. In these cases, complementary studies will be helpful, but currently, there are no well-understood or studied complementary methods. Objective. To analyze the immunohistochemical expression of p16 in conjunctival melanocytic lesions and to assess its potential for differentiating between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. Methods. Immunohistochemical study against p16ink4a (p16) was performed on paraffin-embedded sections on 45 melanocytic lesions (9 melanomas, 19 nevi, and 2 PAMs with atypia and 15 without atypia). Expression was scored according to the German immunoreactive score (IRS). Results. Expression of p16 IRS differed between nevi, PAMs, and melanomas. The mean IRS for melanomas was 3.3 ± 1.8 and was lower than those for nevi (7.63 ± 3.24; P < .05), PAM with atypia (12 ± 0; P < .05), and PAM without atypia (11 ± 1.69; P < .05). Lesions with infiltration depths lower than 2 mm showed higher levels of p16. There were no differences between favorable and unfavorable locations. Conclusion. p16 Expression in conjunctival melanocytic lesions showed an expression similar to that in skin and seems to be a good marker to differentiate nevi and PAMs from melanomas. However, additional studies of larger series and follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

No abstract

Introduction: The caruncle is a modified cutaneous tissue located at the inner canthus that contains hair follicles, accessory lacrimal glands, sweat glands and sebaceous glands. These different types of tissues can give rise to a wide variety of lesions that make the clinical diagnosis difficult. The aim of the study was to investigate the most common types of caruncle lesions and the clinical and pathological correlation.

No abstract

No abstract

PURPOSE: To report two cases of coexisting keratoconus and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy treated with intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: Two patients with coexisting keratoconus and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent ICRS implantation and DMEK, in a two-stage procedure. Follow-up evaluation included Scheimpflug tomography and optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: In both cases, ICRS implantation improved corneal topography and DMEK restored normal corneal thickness. Corrected distance visual acuity improved from 20/100 to 20/30 and from 20/60 to 20/25. Urrets-Zavalía syndrome was diagnosed in one case and addressed with colored contact lens fitting. CONCLUSIONS: Low vision resulting from coexisting keratoconus and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy might be addressed more selectively with posterior lamellar keratoplasty and ICRS implantation. Urrets-Zavalía syndrome must be considered a possible complication after DMEK, especially in patients with keratoconus. [ J Refract Surg . 2020;36(10):703–706.]

No abstract