The increased use of neuroimaging and the aging of society have changed the incidence and proportion of histological types of intracranial tumors in Japan. A population-based epidemiological survey has been reported only from Kumamoto Prefecture. We performed a 10-year survey in Miyazaki Prefecture to compare our findings with the incidence rate (IR) of primary intracranial tumors (PIT) reported in the Kumamoto survey. Our study included 1915 new cases of PIT diagnosed in Miyazaki Prefecture between 2007 and 2016. The crude IR was 16.97/100000/year. The most common tumor was meningioma (46.3%), followed by glioma (17.1%), pituitary adenoma (13.1%), schwannoma (8.2%), and malignant lymphoma (3.8%). The age-specific IR of all PITs and of meningiomas, gliomas, pituitary adenomas, schwannomas, lymphomas, and germ cell tumors was similar in both prefectures. To directly compare with the age-adjusted IRs reported in the Kumamoto survey, we calculated the IR for the two prefectures. The age-adjusted IR of primary brain tumors in Miyazaki Prefecture was 14.65/100000/year, which was slightly higher than in the Kumamoto survey (14.09/100000/year between 1989 and 2008). The ageadjusted IR of glioma, schwannoma, and malignant lymphoma showed only a small difference between Miyazaki and Kumamoto. However, the age-adjusted IR of meningiomas was higher in Miyazaki than Kumamoto (6.15-vs. 4.97/100000/year), but the IR of pituitary adenoma was higher in Kumamoto than Miyazaki (2.66-vs. 2.13/100000/year). Although there were some differences between the two surveys, the IR of PIT showed a similar pattern in Kumamoto and Miyazaki, which are neighboring districts on Kyushu Island.
OBJECTIVE The methylation status of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase ( MGMT) gene promoter is a prognostic factor in adults with glioblastoma (GBM); it also yields information that is useful for clinical decision-making in elderly GBM patients. While pyrosequencing is the gold standard for the evaluation of the methylation status of MGMT, methylation-sensitive polymerase chain reaction (MS-PCR) assay continues to be used widely. Although MS-PCR results exhibited a good correlation with the prognosis of patients with GBM treated under the Stupp protocol, interpretation of the bands is based on subjective judgment, and the assay cannot be used to analyze heterogeneously methylated samples. We assessed whether methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (MS-HRM) is an alternative to MS-PCR. METHODS The authors prepared 3 primer sets that covered CpG 72-89 for MS-HRM analysis to determine the methylation levels of 6 human glioma cell lines. The results were validated by bisulfite sequencing of cloned alleles. The authors also subjected surgical samples from 75 GBM patients treated with temozolomide (TMZ) to MS-HRM to assess the MGMT methylation status and compared the findings with MS-PCR results using receiver operating characteristic (ROC), univariate, and multivariate analyses. RESULTS There was a strong correlation between the methylation levels of the 6 glioma cell lines evaluated by MS-HRM and by bisulfite sequencing; with primers 1 and 2, the correlation was significant (r = 0.959 and r = 0.960, respectively, p < 0.01). Based on log-rank analysis, MS-HRM was significantly better than MS-PCR for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on the methylation status of the MGMT promoter (PFS predicted by MS-HRM and MS-PCR = 0.00023 and 0.0035, respectively; OS = 0.00019 and 0.00028, respectively). ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve was larger with MS-HRM than with MS-PCR (PFS: 0.723 vs 0.635; OS: 0.716 vs 0.695). Based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, MS-HRM was significantly better than MS-PCR for predicting the treatment outcome (MS-HRM vs MS-PCR: PFS, p = 0.001 vs 0.207; OS, p = 0.013 vs 0.135). CONCLUSIONS The authors' findings show that MS-HRM is superior to MS-PCR for the detection of MGMT promoter methylation. They suggest MS-HRM as an alternative to MS-PCR for assessing the prognosis of patients with GBM.
The WHO2016 CNS update requires a combined histological and molecular assessment. To assess the major aberrations such as co-deletion of complete chromosome arms 1p and 19q (Co-del), isocitrate dehydrogenase and histone H3 mutations, direct sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and/or FISH are methods considered to be "golden standard" in the community. However, these methods are expensive and complicated. The aim of this study is verification of the sensitivity of the simple PCR-based techniques for assessment of molecular information in daily diagnosis. We analyzed a total number of 80 patients with gliomas. FISH and PCR-based microsatellite analysis were compared for Co-del assessment. Direct sequencing and qPCR using hig-resolution melting (HRM) were compared for IDH and histone H3 mutations. The sensitivity and specificity of FISH were 0.71 and 0.79, respectively. FISH using a commercially available Vysis probe had a risk of high false-positive rate (0.25). For assessment of IDH1 mutations, the sensitivity and specificity of HRM were 1.0 and 0.96, respectively. For assessment of IDH2 and H3 mutations by HRM, both sensitivity and specificity were 1.0. We consider PCR-based molecular analysis to be a simple and accurate technique in daily diagnosis that is readily available for a small scientific facility.
Microvascular proliferation (MVP), an aberrant vascular structure containing multilayered mitotically active endothelial- and smooth-muscle cells/pericytes, is a histopathological hallmark of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Although MVP tends to be associated with high-grade glioma, it has also been detected in WHO grade I pilocytic astrocytoma (PA). However, little is known about the mechanism underlying its formation. Using TP53 point mutations as a marker for tumor-derived cells, we earlier reported that MVP was partially converted from tumor cells via mesenchymal transition. In the current study we used the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion gene as a marker to assess whether MVPs in PA contained tumor-derived cells and/or phenotypically distinct tumor cells expressing vascular markers. cDNA synthesized from frozen tissue of six PA patients operated at our institute was analyzed to detect the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion gene by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. The breakpoint in the fusion gene was identified by long and accurate PCR (LA-PCR) and Sanger sequencing of genomic DNA. Distinct tumor cells and cellular components of MVP were obtained by laser microdissection. For the qualitative and quantitative detection of the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion gene we performed genomic and digital PCR assays. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to assess gene fusion in cellular components of MVP. Samples from three PA patients harbored the KIAA1549 exon 15, BRAF exon 9 fusion gene. In two patient samples with abundant MVP, RT-PCR assay detected strong bands arising from the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion gene in both tumor cells and cellular components of MVP. Digital PCR showed that vis-à-vis tumor tissue, its relative expression in cellular components of MVP was 42% in one- and 76% in another sample. FISH revealed amplified signals in both tumor cells and cellular components of MVP indicative of tandem duplication. Our findings suggest that in patients with PA, some cellular components of MVP contained tumor derived cell and/or phenotypically distinct tumor cells expressing vascular markers.
Background Dura-attached supratentorial extra-axial ependymoma is a very rare type of tumor, with only nine reported cases. Preoperative diagnosis of dura-attached supratentorial extra-axial ependymoma is difficult and often radiologically misdiagnosed as a meningioma. We report a case of dura-attached supratentorial extra-axial ependymoma that was misdiagnosed using intraoperative histological and cytological examinations. Case presentation A 26-year-old Japanese man with headache and nausea was referred to our medical facility. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a cystic mass of 70 × 53 × 57 mm in the left temporoparietal lobe. A peritumoral band with hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging was observed at the periphery of the lesion, suggesting an extra-axial lesion with no apparent connection to the ventricle. A dural tail sign was also noted on the gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted image. Preoperative clinical diagnosis was meningioma. Proliferated tumor cells in sheets with intermingled branching vessels were observed in the frozen tissue. Perivascular rosettes were inconspicuous, and the tumor cells had rhabdoid cytoplasm. The tumor was intraoperatively diagnosed as a meningioma, suspected to be a rhabdoid meningioma. Perivascular rosettes were evident in the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, suggesting ependymoma. The tumor cells had eosinophilic cytoplasm without a rhabdoid appearance. Anaplastic features, such as high tumor cellularity, increased mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation, and necrosis, were observed. Ependymal differentiation was confirmed on the basis of ultrastructural analysis. Molecular analysis detected C11orf95-RELA fusion gene. The final diagnosis was RELA fusion-positive ependymoma, World Health Organization grade III. Conclusion Owing to its unusual location, dura-attached supratentorial extra-axial ependymomas are frequently misdiagnosed as meningiomas. Neuropathologists should take great precaution in intraoperatively diagnosing this rare subtype of ependymoma to avoid misdiagnosis of the lesion as other common dura-attached tumors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.