No abstract

To investigate the role of staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) produced by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in the pathogenesis of pyoderma, isolates from dogs with pyoderma and healthy dogs were analyzed. According to reverse passive latex agglutination, 14/184 isolates (7.6%) from dogs with pyoderma and 9/87 (10.3%) from healthy dogs produced SEs (SEA, SEC or SED). According to multiplex PCR, 99 isolates (53.7%) from dogs with pyoderma and 97 (90.8%) from healthy dogs possessed one or more se genes. There was no significant difference regarding ses between dogs with pyoderma and healthy dogs. Therefore, SEs may not be a direct virulence factor in pyoderma.

: There are several causes of atypical femoral fractures (AFF) in elderly Japanese patients, including longterm bisphosphonate (BP) use or bowed femoral shaft stress fractures, but the available sample size for examining AFF etiology in a single institution is limited. The purpose of this study was to categorize the characteristics of AFF by analyzing the data compiled on patients treated at our hospital and at affiliated institutes. This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included 34 AFF cases (bilateral AFF 10) in one male and 23 female patients (age range 30-90 years, mean age 73.0 years). Evaluation measures included the presence/absence of BP use, duration of BP use, history of other drug use, presence/absence of comorbidities, fracture site, presence/absence of femoral lateral bowing, bone biopsy parameters, and time to bone union. Nineteen patients were prescribed BP for osteoporosis (duration range 4-10 years, mean duration 6.1 years). Subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures were seen in 16 and 18 cases, respectively (complete fractures 22, incomplete fractures 12). Femoral lateral bowing (n = 16) occurred with femoral shaft fractures. Mean time to bone union was 9.0 months (complete fractures 11.3 months, incomplete fractures 3.7 months). AFF could be substantially caused by three factors: BP use, drugs other than BP/ comorbidity, and femoral lateral bowing. Twenty four patients were classified as having BP-related-type (n = 2), drug/comorbidity-type (n = 3), lateral bowing-type (n = 2), or mixed-type (n = 17) AFF. AFF etiology cannot be explained by a single cause; thus, a multifactorial etiology, including poor bone quality due to mutual interactions and mechanical stress, seems to be responsible for the occurrence of AFF. Level of evidence: Ⅳ diagnostic

Background: Deep gluteal syndrome (DGS) is an uncommon source of buttock and groin pain, resulting from entrapment of the sciatic nerve in the deep gluteal space. The incidence and risk factors of postoperative DGS after primary hip arthroscopic surgery are currently unknown. Purpose: To investigate the incidence and risk factors of postoperative DGS after primary hip arthroscopic surgery. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study reviewed 1167 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery between 2010 and 2018 by a single surgeon at a single center in Japan. DGS was defined using the seated piriformis stretch test, active hamstring test, and evidence of a hypertrophic sciatic nerve on magnetic resonance imaging. Overall, 11 of 1167 patients were diagnosed with DGS postoperatively. The DGS group (n = 11) was compared with the non-DGS group (n = 1156). Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), generalized joint laxity (GJL; Beighton score >6), number of hip arthroscopic procedures, and radiographic parameters including lateral center-edge angle, Sharp angle, vertical center anterior angle, Tönnis angle, alpha angle, ischiofemoral distance, ischiofemoral space, and quadratus femoris space were compared. The prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and borderline DDH (BDDH) was also compared. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify potential predictors for a postoperative DGS diagnosis. Results: The incidence of postoperative DGS in our study was 0.9%. Female sex (male:female ratio: 0:11 in DGS group vs 568:588 in non-DGS group; P < .01), mean number of hip surgical procedures (1.8 ± 0.9 in DGS group vs 1.1 ± 0.4 in non-DGS group; P < .01), and GJL ( P < .01) were significantly higher in the DGS group, while the mean BMI was significantly lower in the DGS group (19.8 ± 1.8 vs 22.7 ± 3.6 kg/m2, respectively; P < .01). Radiographic parameters were not significantly different between groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that female sex (odds ratio [OR], 22.0 [95% CI, 1.29-374.56]), multiple surgical procedures (OR, 7.8 [95% CI, 2.36-25.95]), GJL (OR, 40.9 [95% CI, 8.74-191.70]), lower BMI (OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.644-0.914]), and DDH/BDDH (OR, 18.1 [95% CI, 2.30-142.10]) were potential predictors of postoperative DGS. Conclusion: The incidence of postoperative DGS in our study was 0.9%. The predictors for postoperative DGS after hip arthroscopic surgery were female sex, GJL, multiple hip surgical procedures, and DDH/BDDH. Although hip arthroscopic surgery can provide favorable clinical outcomes, surgeons should be aware of the risk factors for DGS as a complication of hip arthroscopic surgery.

An 83 year-old Japanese woman complained of left lateral thigh pain following a low-energy fall 4 months prior to admission. She had been treated for osteoporosis with Risedronate and Alfacalcidol for the previous five years. She was diagnosed with an atypical femoral fracture (AFF) according to the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) Task Force revised criteria. Radiographs revealed cortical thickening and a transverse radiolucent fracture line in the lateral cortex of the shaft. MRI showed a high intensity signal on the T2WI image 1 cm long in the lateral cortex. The patient had normal levels of bone resorption and formation biomarkers except for low 25(OH) Vitamin D. Double fluorescent labeling was done preoperatively. Due to significant bowing, a corrective osteotomy and intramedullary nailing were performed, and the resected bone wedge was analyzed by bone histomorphometry. Three ground sections of the lateral cortex at the fracture site showed many and large pores, with or without tetracycline labeling. Histomorphometric assessment was done on intracortical pores, classified by a novel criteria, only to assess size of the pores to know prolonged osteoclastic activity and its characteristics of inner surfaces to assess whether bone formation has been occurring or not in labeling period in remodeling cycle, and coalition of multi-pores. Increased size with widespread variation of pores suggested prolonged osteoclastic activity in the reversal/resorptive phase. Bone labeling showed lamellar bone on the endocortical surface. We hypothesize that the case had developed from a regional disturbance of osteonal remodeling in the lateral cortex, in which accumulated microcracks might have initiated a resorption process resulting in resorption cavities, i.e., pores, which became larger due to prolonged activity of secondary osteoclasts. Various sized pores could form lamellar bone, still forming at the time of biopsy, some had formed lamellar bone, but stopped to form before labeling and not to start to form at all, probably due to incomplete coupling. Endocortical lamellar bone might had started to resorbed to smooth off endocortical surface, followed by formation of lamellar bone. The endocortical bone formation was assessed and its formation period is about 2.7 years. A finite element analysis using preoperative CT data revealed high tensile stresses on the lateral aspect of the femur. Histomorphometric results suggest that there might be more pores in the tensile area than the compressive area. These findings may subsequently connect accumulation of microcracks, an increase of size and number of pores and coalition and subsequent fracture in the lateral cortex.