Differential diagnosis of AD is still a challenge due to overlapping features with other types of dementia. Biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of AD can improve the diagnostic value of the disease and ensure an appropriate treatment of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of two neo-epitope fragments of Tau as serum biomarkers for differential diagnosis of AD. The neo-epitope fragments of Tau were assessed in a cross-sectional cohort of subjects with AD, MCI, other dementias or subjects with non-dementia related memory complaints. The two Tau neo-epitope fragments were an ADAM10-generated fragment (Tau-A) and a caspase-3-generated fragment (Tau-C). The serum levels of the fragments were measured by two competitive ELISAs detecting Tau-A and Tau-C, respectively. Tau-A and Tau-C were able to separate subjects with AD and MCI from those with other dementias (p<0.0042 and p<0.05), and Tau-A could also discriminate between AD and MCI patients and subjects with non-dementia related memory complaints (p<0.05). Tau-A showed a significantly greater discrimination between AD and MCI subjects and patients with other dementias when compared to CSF biomarkers t-Tau and p-Tau. The ability of Tau-A to differentiate between AD and MCI from other dementias was comparable with CSF Aβ1-42, t-Tau/Aβ1-42 and p-Tau/Aβ1-42. The separation between the diagnostic groups was significantly improved when the CSF biomarkers as well as age and BMI were used in combination with Tau-A (AUC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-0.94) (p<0.0001). In conclusion, this study shows that a neoepitope fragment of Tau detected in serum can provide guidance on the differential diagnosis of AD.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.