The development of methods for individual identification in wild species and the refinement of Capture-Mark-Recapture (CMR) models during the past decades has greatly improved the assessment of population demographic rates to answer ecological and conservation questions. In particular, multistate models, with their flexibility for the analysis of complex study systems, have become popular in the ecological community. However, despite the extensive use of these models, little attention has been paid to the effect of common violations of the CMR model assumptions, such as mark loss and the often-associated recycling of remarked individuals. To explore this knowledge gap we used a wide range of simulation scenarios reflecting frequently encountered real case studies inspired from the survival rates of 700 vertebrates' species. We estimated the effects of mark loss and recycled individuals on parameter estimates using a multi-state Cormack-Jolly-Seber (MSCJS) framework. We explored parameter bias through simulations of a metapopulation system with different capture and survival rates. We also illustrated how mark loss can be easily estimated and accounted for using an empirical long-term (10 years) CMR dataset of bats, individually identified using both PIT tag technology as marks that can be lost, and multi-locus genotypes as "permanent marks". The results from our simulated scenarios demonstrated that the occurrence of bias and the parameters concerned were highly dependent on the study system, and no general rules on parameter behaviour can be established a priori. The model structure and the interdependency among parameters make it challenging to predict how bias could affect estimates. Our results highlight the need to assess the effect of mark loss when using MSCJS models. Ignoring such violations of model assumptions can have important implications for ecological inferences and conservation policies. In general, the use of permanent marks (e.g. genotype), should always be preferred when modelling of population dynamics and if not possible, combining two types of temporary marks (e.g. PIT tags, bands) should be considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.