Pulmonary dissolution of poorly soluble drug substances (DSs) may limit the drug absorption rate and consequently influence clinical performance. Dissolution rate is thus an important quality attribute, and its influence on in vivo drug release must be characterized, understood, and controlled early in the development process. The aim of this study is to establish an in vitro dissolution method with the capability to capture therapeutically relevant differences in the dissolution rate between drug batches and drug compounds. A method was developed by which a biorelevant aerosol fraction was captured on a filter using a sedimentation technique in a modified Andersen cascade impactor to avoid particle agglomeration. Subsequently, the filters were transferred to a commercial Transwell system where dissolution in 3 mL of phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 with 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) occurred at sink conditions. Dissolved DS was quantified over time using UPLC-UV. Dissolution data was obtained on a series of micronized and aerosolized lipophilic DSs, budesonide, fluticasone furoate (FF), fluticasone propionate (FP), and AZD5423. The latter is a lipophilic AstraZeneca development compound available in two different mass median diameters (MMD), 1.3 (AZD54231.3) and 3.1 μm (AZD54233.1). Dissolution data were evaluated using a Weibull fit and expressed as t 63, the time to dissolution of 63% of the initial dose. The following rank-order of t 63 was obtained (mean t 63 and MMD in brackets), budesonide (10 min, 2.1 μm) = AZD54231.3 (10 min, 1.3 μm) < AZD54233.1 (19 min, 3.1 μm) < FP (38 min, 2.4 μm) < FF (63 min, 2.5 μm). The method could differentiate between different drug compounds with different solubility but similar particle size distribution, as well as between the same drug compound with different particle size distributions. Furthermore, a relation between the in vitro dissolution rate (t 63) and mean pulmonary absorption time in man (literature data) was observed, indicating clinical relevance. It is thus concluded, that the method may be useful for the characterization and ranking of DSs and drug products in early development, as well as being a potential tool for the control of dissolution as a potential quality attribute.

No abstract

No abstract

Impactor-type dose deposition is a common prerequisite for dissolution testing of inhaled medicines, and drug release typically takes place through a membrane. The purpose of this work is to develop a mechanistic model for such combined dissolution and release processes, focusing on a drug that initially is present in solid form. Our starting points are the Noyes–Whitney (or Nernst–Brunner) equation and Fick’s law. A detailed mechanistic analysis of the drug release process is provided, and approximate closed-form expressions for the amount of the drug that remains in solid form and the amount of the drug that has been released are derived. Comparisons with numerical data demonstrated the accuracy of the approximate expressions. Comparisons with experimental release data from literature demonstrated that the model can be used to establish rate-controlling release mechanisms. In conclusion, the model constitutes a valuable tool for the analysis of in vitro dissolution data for inhaled drugs.

Ideal controlled pulmonary drug delivery systems provide sustained release by retarding lung clearance mechanisms and efficient lung deposition to maintain therapeutic concentrations over prolonged time. Here, we use atomic layer deposition (ALD) to simultaneously tailor the release and aerosolization properties of inhaled drug particles without the need for lactose carrier. In particular, we deposit uniform nanoscale oxide ceramic films, such as Al2O3, TiO2, and SiO2, on micronized budesonide particles, a common active pharmaceutical ingredient for the treatment of respiratory diseases. In vitro dissolution and ex vivo isolated perfused rat lung tests demonstrate dramatically slowed release with increasing nanofilm thickness, regardless of the nature of the material. Ex situ transmission electron microscopy at various stages during dissolution unravels mostly intact nanofilms, suggesting that the release mechanism mainly involves the transport of dissolution media through the ALD films. Furthermore, in vitro aerosolization testing by fast screening impactor shows a ∼2-fold increase in fine particle fraction (FPF) for each ALD-coated budesonide formulation after 10 ALD process cycles, also applying very low patient inspiratory pressures. The higher FPFs after the ALD process are attributed to the reduction in the interparticle force arising from the ceramic surfaces, as evidenced by atomic force microscopy measurements. Finally, cell viability, cytokine release, and tissue morphology analyses verify a safe and efficacious use of ALD-coated budesonide particles at the cellular level. Therefore, surface nanoengineering by ALD is highly promising in providing the next generation of inhaled formulations with tailored characteristics of drug release and lung deposition, thereby enhancing controlled pulmonary delivery opportunities.

No abstract

Dissolution rate impacts the absorption rate of poorly soluble inhaled drugs. In vitro dissolution tests that can capture the impact of changes in critical quality attributes of the drug product on in vivo dissolution are important for the development of products containing poorly soluble drugs, as well as modified release formulations. In this study, an extended mathematical model allowing for dissolution of polydisperse powders and subsequent diffusion of dissolved drug across a membrane is described. In vitro dissolution profiles of budesonide, fluticasone propionate, and beclomethasone dipropionate delivered from three commercial drug products were determined using a membrane-type Transwell dissolution test, which consists of a donor and an acceptor compartment separated by a membrane. Subsequently, the profiles were analyzed using the developed mechanistic model and a semi-empirical model based on the Weibull distribution. The two mathematical models provided the same rank order of the performance of the three drug products in terms of dissolution rates, but the rates were significantly different. The faster rate extracted from the mechanistic model is expected to reflect the true dissolution rate of the drug; the Weibull model provides an effective and slower rate that represents not only drug dissolution but also diffusion across the Transwell membrane. In conclusion, the developed extended model provides superior understanding of the dissolution mechanisms in membrane-type (Transwell) dissolution tests.