No abstract

This paper presents updated recommendations of the Study Group on Forensic Age Diagnostics for age estimations in living individuals in criminal proceedings. In order to increase the diagnostic accuracy and to improve the identification of age-relevant developmental disorders, a physical examination, an X-ray examination of the left hand, as well as a dental examination including the determination of the dental status and an X-ray of the dentition should be performed in each case. If the skeletal development of the hand is completed, an additional radiological examination of the clavicles should be carried out. Minimum requirements for reference studies are defined and recommendable studies are listed. Instructions for the examination and the preparation of expert reports are presented. The committee of the study group organizes annual proficiency tests for quality assurance.

The clavicle plays an important role for forensic age estimation in living individuals, particularly with regard to the age of majority. The present prospective study aims to evaluate the age-dependent ossification process of the medial clavicular epiphysis in order to establish the clavicular sub-stages introduced in 2010 as well as the advantages and possibilities of thin-slice computed tomography (CT). For this purpose, 0.6 mm thin-slice CT scans of sternoclavicular joints of 572 bodies aged between 10 and 40 years were evaluated by means of two complementary classification systems: a five-stage system and a sub-staging system for the main stages 2 and 3. Assessment was possible in 493 cases. The results for stages 4 and 5 are in line with previous studies that found the ages of 21 years and 26 years, respectively, as minimum ages for these stages. Sub-stage 3c was first found at the age of 19 years in both sexes, thereby corroborating the value of this sub-stage as to statements about the age of majority. In comparison to other CT studies, stage 3a was first observed ~1 year earlier (16.4 years in males and 15.5 years in females). Stage 2c only occurred in 3 cases. In conclusion, the data corroborate the significance of diagnosing sub-stages as well as the value of thin-slice CT. For forensic practice, the concomitant and complementary use of both classification systems applied in this study can be recommended.

No abstract

No abstract

Computed tomography (CT) of the medial clavicular epiphysis has been well established in forensic age estimations of living individuals undergoing criminal proceedings. The present study examines the influence of the examiner's qualification on the determination of the clavicular ossification stage. Additionally, the most frequent sources of error made during the stage assessment process should be uncovered. To this end, thin-slice CT scans of 1,420 clavicles were evaluated by one inexperienced and two experienced examiners. The latter did the evaluations in consensus. Two classification systems, a five-stage system and a substaging system for the main stages 2 and 3, were used. Prior to three of his six assessment sessions, the inexperienced examiner was specifically taught staging of clavicles. Comparison of the examiners' results revealed increasing inter- and intraobserver agreements with increasing state of qualification of the inexperienced examiner (from κ= 0.494 to 0.674 and from κ= 0.634 to 0.783, respectively). The attribution of a not-assessable anatomic shape variant to an ossification stage was identified as the most frequent error during stage determination (n= 349), followed by the overlooking of the epiphyseal scar defining stage 4 (n= 144). As to the clavicular substages, classifying substage 3a instead of 3b was found to be the most frequent error (n= 69). The data of this study indicate that κ values must not be considered as objective measures for inter- and intraobserver agreements. Furthermore, a high degree of specific qualification, particularly the knowledge about the diversity of anatomic shape variants, appears to be mandatory and indispensable for reliable evaluation of the medial clavicular epiphysis.

No abstract

As superimposition effects often impede the evaluation of the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis in standard posterior-anterior (PA) radiographs, additional oblique images (right anterior oblique, RAO, and left anterior oblique, LAO) are currently recommended to allow for reliable stage assessments. The present study examines the influence of the radiographic projection type on stage determination. To this end, 836 sternoclavicular joints were prospectively obtained during forensic autopsies of bodies aged between 15 and 30 years. Subsequently, three different radiographs (PA, RAO, and LAO) were taken from each specimen and separately evaluated as to the developmental stage of the medial clavicular epiphysis. A forensically established five-stage classification system was used. In 25 % of the cases, the medial clavicular epiphysis depicted in an oblique projection showed a different ossification stage than in the PA projection. In at least 10 % of the cases, a higher ossification stage was observed which would have significant disadvantages in criminal proceedings (ethically unacceptable error). In conclusion, the usage of the current radiographic reference data, which rely upon chest radiographs taken as PA projections, appears to be inadmissible for oblique projections. Projection radiography of the clavicle can therefore no longer be recommended for forensic age estimation practice. As to the question of whether an individual has achieved the age of 18 or 21, computed tomography of the clavicle must be regarded as the exclusive method of choice.