2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital forensic osteology—Possibilities in cooperation with the Virtopsy® project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the 95% confidence interval for the measurement difference between CT and dry bone measurements of the lower limb and foot was approximately +/-5 mm [2], which is considerably larger than the generally accepted level in anthropology. The range of measurement error obtained by Verhoff et al [19] is between 1 and 2 mm; a result that is more acceptable within forensic applications. Besides validating the measurement error between dry and CT images for the areas that have previously been evaluated, measurement errors need to be recorded for the entire skeleton as almost all elements are used in estimation techniques for ancestry, sex, stature and age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the 95% confidence interval for the measurement difference between CT and dry bone measurements of the lower limb and foot was approximately +/-5 mm [2], which is considerably larger than the generally accepted level in anthropology. The range of measurement error obtained by Verhoff et al [19] is between 1 and 2 mm; a result that is more acceptable within forensic applications. Besides validating the measurement error between dry and CT images for the areas that have previously been evaluated, measurement errors need to be recorded for the entire skeleton as almost all elements are used in estimation techniques for ancestry, sex, stature and age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…air and bone). Several studies compared the measurements obtained from bones within the soft tissues and measurements of the same bones following the removal of soft tissues [1, 2,19]. Both Decker et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gender determination, trauma analysis, age estimation) [18,22]. Sex determination using CT scans has already been used in many studies [4,6,14,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culbert and Law (1927) Currently there is no agreed protocol to create a biological profile from PMCT examination of juveniles or adults. The literature presents a number of studies using single osteological or odontological assessments to assist with biological profiling (41)(42)(43)(44), but a system compiling all of these assessments into a single protocol had yet to be published or presented. In addition, the majority of these studies have been conducted using an adult cohort, with very few extending to the juvenile age range.…”
Section: Pmct and Developing Human Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%