Aims: This work investigates the maintenance of viability and potential virulence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in a viable but nonculturable population (VBNC) state by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Methods and Results: Housekeeping genes, 16S-23S rDNA and rpoS, as well as virulence genes, tdh1 and tdh2, were selected and detected by PCR in a pathogenic strain of V. parahaemolyticus (Vp4). Their expression was then studied by RT-PCR in V. parahaemolyticus Vp4 cultivated in rich medium at 37°C. The 16S-23S rDNA and rpoS, tdh1, tdh2 genes were transcripted at the mid-logarithmic, stationary and late stationary phases, corresponding to various physiological states. The expression of these genes was also studied by RT-PCR in a VBNC population of V. parahaemolyticus Vp4 in artificial seawater (ASW). The effect of temperature (washing of bacterial culture and microcosms) on the attaining VBNC bacteria was first considered. Washing of V. parahaemolyticus Vp4, collected at the mid-logarithmic phase, at 10 or 4°C before inoculation in ASW at 4°C allowed bacteria entered the VBNC state between 22 and 31 days. The 16S-23S rDNA and rpoS gene were expressed in the VBNC bacteria whereas no expression of the tdh1 and tdh2 genes was observed in the same populations. Conclusion: The two selected housekeeping genes, 16S-23S rDNA and rpoS, proved to be good viability markers for V. parahaemolyticus Vp4 in culturable and VBNC states. These first data indicated that the pathogenic strain Vp4 would not maintain the expression of the virulence genes, tdh1 and tdh2, in VBNC state. Significance and Impact of the Study: Use of RT-PCR for investigating the maintenance or not of viability and potential virulence in VBNC V. parahaemolyticus will facilitate further study to evaluate the potential risk presented by this pathogen in the environment.

The objective of this study was to explore the recovery of culturability of viable but nonculturable (VBNC) Vibrio parahaemolyticus after temperature upshift and to determine whether regrowth or resuscitation occurred. A clinical strain of V. parahaemolyticus Vp5 was rendered VBNC by exposure to artificial seawater (ASW) at 41C. Aliquots of the ASW suspension of cells (0.1, 1 and 10 ml) were subjected to increased temperatures of 201C and 371C. Culturability of the cells in the aliquots was monitored for colony formation on a rich medium and changes in morphology were measured by scanning (SEM) and transmission (TEM) electron microscopy. Samples of VBNC cells were fixed and examined by SEM, revealing a heterogeneous population comprising small cells and larger, flattened cells. Forty-eight hours after temperature upshift to 201C or 371C, both elongation and division by binary fission of the cells were observed, employing SEM and TEM, but only in the 10-ml aliquots. The results suggest that a portion of VBNC cells is able to undergo cell division. It is concluded that a portion of VBNC cells of V. parahaemolyticus subjected to cold temperatures remain viable. After temperature upshift, regrowth of those cells, rather than resuscitation of all bacteria of the initial inoculum, appears to be responsible for recovery of culturability of VBNC cells of V. parahaemolyticus. Nutrient in filtrates of VBNC cells is hypothesized to allow growth of the temperature-responsive cells, with cell division occurring via binary fission, but also including an atypical, asymmetric cell division.

A real-time reverse transcription-PCR method was developed to determine whether the recovery of culturability of viable but nonculturable (VBNC) Vibrio parahaemolyticus induced the expression of virulence genes coding for the thermostable direct hemolysin and for type III secretion system 2 (TTSS2). The culturability of clinical strain Vp5 of V. parahaemolyticus in artificial seawater at 4°C was monitored, and the VBNC state was obtained. One day after entry into the VBNC state, temperature upshifts to 20 and 37°C allowed the recovery of culturability. Standard curves for the relative quantification of expression of the housekeeping genes rpoS, pvsA, fur, and pvuA; the tdh2 gene; and the TTSS2 genes (VPA1354, VPA1346, and VPA1342) were established. The levels of expression of the pvsA and pvuA genes were stable and were used to normalize the levels of expression of the other genes. No transcriptional induction of the selected virulence genes under the temperature conditions used to recover the culturability of the VBNC bacteria was observed. The study results demonstrate that the recovery of culturability of VBNC cells of pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus is restricted to regrowth, without correlation with the induction of virulence gene expression. Disease induction would depend mainly on host-pathogen interactions that allow the expression of the virulence genes. This is the first time that the use of mRNA to detect viable cells was evaluated by computing the half-lives of multiple mRNA species under conditions inducing the VBNC state.Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a marine bacterium of which some strains generate food-borne outbreaks of disease characterized by acute gastroenteritis. The thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) and TDH-related hemolysin were previously considered to be the main factors at the origin of these enterotoxic phenomena. Recently, the genome sequencing of a clinical strain of V. parahaemolyticus, RIMD 2210633, has revealed several other factors of virulence, including genes for two type III secretion systems (TTSS), TTSS1 and TTSS2, present on chromosomes 1 and 2, respectively (18). TTSS1 has been described as a cytotoxic system, and TTSS2 has been described as an enterotoxic system (25). Under environmental stresses, such as a temperature downshift, V. parahaemolyticus appears to be fairly inactive metabolically and enters into a dormant state, namely, the viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state. The VBNC cells are able to respond to some environmental stimuli, such as a temperature upshift, and to become metabolically active and culturable. The recovery of culturability by the VBNC cells of V. cholerae, V. vulnificus, and V. parahaemolyticus has been demonstrated to cause in vivo pathogenicity (1,6,23). Two scenarios may explain the virulence: a high number of cells (a high infectious dose) without significant regulation of the virulence genes and/or genetic up-regulation of virulence genes under such conditions.To determine if cells induce the expression of virulence genes after the recovery o...