No abstract

Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted early breast cancer (EBC) treatment worldwide. This study analyzed how Brazilian breast specialists are managing EBC. Methods An electronic survey was conducted with members of the Brazilian Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (SBM) between April 30 and May 11, 2020. Bivariate analysis was used to describe changes in how specialists managed EBC at the beginning and during the pandemic, according to breast cancer subtype and oncoplastic surgery. Results The response rate was 34.4% (503/1462 specialists). Most of the respondents (324; 64.4%) lived in a state capital city, were board-certified as breast specialists (395; 78.5%) and either worked in an academic institute or one associated with breast cancer treatment (390; 77.5%). The best response rate was from the southeast of the country (240; 47.7%) followed by the northeast (128; 25.4%). At the beginning of the pandemic, 43% changed their management approach. As the outbreak progressed, this proportion increased to 69.8% (p < 0.001). The southeast of the country (p = 0.005) and the state capital cities (p < 0.001) were associated with changes at the beginning of the pandemic, while being female (p = 0.001) was associated with changes during the pandemic. For hormone receptor-positive tumors with the best prognosis (Ki-67 < 20%), 47.9% and 17.7% of specialists would recommend neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal and premenopausal women, respectively. For tumors with poorer prognosis (Ki-67 > 30%), 34% and 10.9% would recommend it for postmenopausal and premenopausal women, respectively. Menopausal status significantly affected whether the specialists changed their approach (p < 0.00001). For tumors ≥ 1.0 cm, 42.9% of respondents would recommend neoadjuvant systemic therapy for triple-negative tumors and 39.6% for HER2 + tumors. Overall, 63.4% would recommend immediate total breast reconstruction, while only 3.4% would recommend autologous reconstruction. In breast-conserving surgery, 75% would recommend partial breast reconstruction; however, 54.1% would contraindicate mammoplasty. Furthermore, 84.9% of respondents would not recommend prophylactic mastectomy in cases of BRCA mutation. Conclusions Important changes occurred in EBC treatment, particularly for hormone receptor-positive tumors, as the outbreak progressed in each region. Systematic monitoring could assure appropriate breast cancer treatment, mitigating the impact of the pandemic.

No abstract

Surgical treatment of breast cancer has changed considerably over the past four decades, culminating in the substitution of conservative approaches for Halsted's paradigm from 1894. In parallel, many breast reconstruction techniques have been proposed for patients requiring mastectomy with loss of the nipple-areola complex (NAC). Myocutaneous flaps were once the most common form of reconstruction, but recently the use of implants and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) in one or two stages has gained popularity. In this descriptive and cross-sectional study, we evaluated a sample of 31 NSM procedures with periareolar incision and two-stage reconstruction (tissue expander followed by implant) conducted between 2013 and 2017, with emphasis on the rate of complications after at least 3 months of follow-up, local disease control and cosmesis measured on the Harvard scale. Five complications (16%) were observed, all of which related to the first stage: seroma (n = 1; 3.2%), treated with needle aspiration, NAC necrosis (n = 3; 9.6%), one case of which required debridement, and dehiscence (n = 1; 3.2%), treated with resuture. Cosmesis was classified as excellent by the surgeon in 96.8% (n = 27). At the time of writing, no local recurrence had been observed. In conclusion, NSM with periareolar incision and two-stage reconstruction was found to be technically feasible and associated with few complications and satisfactory esthetic outcomes.

No abstract

No abstract

To the Editor, The article entitled "Discordance of COVID-19 guidelines for patients with cancer: A systematic review" evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on cancer care. 1 The authors did a great job in this review and concluded that "guidelines based on limited evidence show discordance and need to be interpreted with caution". For breast cancer surgery, there was also discordance in recommendations. We read the article with great interest and agree with these conclusions. Early breast cancer (EBC) is a curable disease at an early stage and with multimodal treatment. Upfront surgery is accompanied by adjuvant therapy in most cases, which improves prognosis. Changes in these protocols may negatively affect outcomes in cases of EBC. We would like to add the perceptions of Brazilian mastologists regarding breast cancer guidelines.

INTRODUCTION Current definition of HER2-positive BC follows ASCO/CAP guidelines using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridization (ISH)-based techniques. However, HER2 expression can be variable in cells that lack ERBB2 amplification. For example, HER2-negative tumors can express some level of HER2 protein by IHC (i.e. 1+ or 2+ and a negative ISH result) and are identified as HER2-low. Others have no expression and are considered HER2-zero. Innovative therapies have shown promising activity in patients in HER2-low BC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of HER2-low and HER2-zero status with response to NACT in HER2-negative BC. METHODS Retrospective cohort of patients with HER2-negative BC treated with NACT in four institutions in Brazil. Protocols of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up were standardized and based on international guidelines. Tumors with HER2 IHC score 0 were classified as HER2-zero whereas tumors with HER2 score 1+ and those with HER2 score 2+ with FISH-negative were classified as HER2-low. Patients were treated with anthracycline- and taxane- based chemotherapy. The following clinicopathological data were evaluated, when available: age, ER, Ki67, tumor size, lymph node (LN) status and response to NACT according to pCR status and residual cancer burden (RCB) index. Primary objective was to evaluate the prevalences and compare pCR rates among HER2-zero and HER2-low cases. Secondary objectives were to perform the same comparison within the HR-positive (HR+) and HR-negative subgroups. Pearsons chi squared tests were performed and a p value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS 331 patients were included in this analysis. 63% were HR+and 37% were TNBC. 50% were HER2-zero and 50% HER-low (36% HER2 IHC 1+ and 14% HER2 IHC 2+/FISH-negative). Median age, initial tumor size, clinical LN status and Ki67 expression were similar among HER2-zero and HER2-low subgroups. In HR+ tumors, 42% (86/207) were HER2-zero and 58% (121/207) were HER2-low. In TNBC, 63% (78/124) were HER2-zero and 37% (46/124) were HER2-low (p&lt;0.001, Pearsons chi squared test). The pCR rate was 26% (85/331) in the entire cohort. As expected, there was a higher rate of pCR in TNBC vs HR+ (50% vs 11%, p&lt;0.001). We found a statistically significant difference in the pCR rates when comparing the HER2-zero versus HER2-low subgroups (31% vs 20%, p=0.03). However, this difference is mostly related to an imbalance between groups (HER2-zero subgroups had a higher proportion of TNBC). Among HR+ tumors, there was no difference in the pCR rates between HER2-zero and HER2-low subgroups (8% vs 13%, p=0.35). In TNBC, we identified an interesting but non-statistically significant difference in pCR in HER2-zero vs. HER2-low tumors (56% vs. 39%, p=0.09). In the TNBC cohort we identified a non-statistically significant difference in RCB 0-I in HER2-zero vs. HER2-low tumors (p=0.06). With a 30 month median follow-up, PFS and OS data are immature. CONCLUSION The distribution of HER2-zero and HER2-low cases is different in HR+ and TNBC. HER2-low is more frequent in HR+ and HER2-zero in TNBC. We identified a higher pCR rate in HER2-zero compared to HER2-low tumors, even though this difference is associated with an imbalance between the two groups. Still, we identified a trend to higher pCR rate in HER2-zero compared to HER2-low tumors even within the TNBC subgroup. Identification of HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors may have clinical implications that should be further explored. Citation Format: Tomas Reinert, Guilherme Parisotto Sartori, Alessandra AB Souza, Rodrigo Pellegrini, Mahira L Rosa, Nathalia Rossatto, Guilherme P Coelho, Isnard E Litvin, Felipe Zerwes, Eduardo Millen, Francisco P Cavalcante, Antonio L Frasson, Marcia S Graudenz, Carlos H Barrios. Prevalence of HER2-low and HER2-zero subgroups and correlation with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-22.