Since 1988, Brazil has built a national health system procuring a response that meets universal health care. The government created the Family Health Strategy (FHS) to help improve access to health services through primary health care teams developing interdisciplinary actions. Scarcity of doctors with family medicine (FM) competencies in Brazil limits the FHS effectiveness. The lack of family physicians can be traced primarily to the medical schools where training supports other specialties besides FM. Innovation is required to bring students to the specialty and medical marketplace. The authors relate their experience and advances in designing alternatives to seize solutions to address challenges related to strategic aspects of FM that can improve medical education practices. Challenges presented exemplify means to expose students to key principles of FM practice such as continuity, commitment and longitudinal care, together with other attributes of FM practice such as team work and interprofessional action. A key asset in overcoming the challenges for primary health care through improved FM practice is the exposure of students to FM practitioners that mentor student practices as role models in different settings where health care is provided.
students would be assigned several case scenarios to review prior to the lecture. The respective faculty member would spend the 2 hours reviewing these cases and any other material that he or she felt was relevant. Why the idea was necessary There were several problems with this structure. Firstly, students rarely did any preparation for the sessions, which made the lectures much less interactive. Secondly, faculty members made numerous complaints about the time commitment necessary for the curriculum. Specifically, lectures were held at 15.00-17.00 hours on 2 days per week, which interfered with the faculty members' other clinical duties. To minimise this disruption, approximately 40 different faculty members delivered lectures over the course of the year. This led to a great deal of variability in the content and quality of the sessions. Finally, students complained that the 2-hour sessions were too long. What was done The structure of the junior core curriculum was changed in July 2009. Each division was given the responsibility of writing two to six cases covering the clinical objectives of their specialty. In addition, each case included one to three multiplechoice questions and detailed discussions of the answers. Students are expected to read the case, answer the questions and review the discussions online in preparation for 1-hour sessions with faculty members from each subspecialty. The curriculum coordinator sends the distribution of student answers to the faculty member prior to the session. The faculty member reviews key concepts from the cases, addresses questions that were missed by large proportions of students and discusses additional relevant material within his or her specialty. Evaluation of results and impact The change has resulted in a 50% decrease in the number of faculty hours spent on clerkship lectures. Further, the number of faculty members who deliver these sessions has decreased from approximately 40 to 21, resulting in much less variability. This decrease in the number of lecturers has also allowed us to conduct focused faculty development with each lecturer. The elimination of the 15.00 hours lecture has also substantially limited the disruption to clinic schedules. Faculty members have noted much better student participation and preparation for the lectures.Student evaluations of the clerkship have included fewer complaints about ineffective lecturers. The overall scores on anonymous evaluation forms filled out by students at the end of the rotation have not significantly changed. The mean shelf score is unchanged. In conclusion, the implementation of online case-based learning prior to a discussion with a professor from the respective specialty has resulted in decreased demands on faculty time and created a consistent teaching team without loss of student approval or impact on National Board of Medical Examiners scores.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.