The molecular structure of methyl formate is determined from ab initio calculations. The molecule presents two conformers (cis and trans) with a 5.3 kcal mol À1 difference in energy. In the most stable cis conformer, the carbonyl group eclipses the methyl group. The internal rotation barriers are V 3 (cis) ¼ 368 cm À1 and V 3 (trans) ¼ 26 cm À1 for the methyl group and V CO ¼ 4826 cm À1 for the CO group. The dependence of the spectroscopic parameters on the torsional motions is detailed. The rotational-torsional energy levels have been calculated variationally up to J ¼ 6 using a flexible model depending on the two torsional modes. Far-infrared frequencies and intensities are determined at room temperature. The rotational parameters have been computed to be A

No abstract

We present a molecular docking study aimed to identify the binding site of protonated aminopyridines for the blocking of voltage dependent K(+) channels. Several active aminopyridines are considered: 2-aminopyridine, 3-aminopyridine, 4-aminopyridine, 3,4-diaminopyridine, and 4-aminoquinoleine. We apply the AutoDock force field with a lamarckian genetic algorithm, using atomic charges for the ligands derived from the electrostatic potential obtained at the B3LYP/cc-pVDZ level. We find a zone in the alpha-subunit of the K(+) channel bearing common binding sites. This zone corresponds to five amino acids comprised between residuals Thr107 and Ala111, in the KcsA K(+) channel (1J95 pdb structure). The 2-aminopyridine, 3-aminopyridine, 4-aminopyridine, and 3,4-diaminopyridine bind to the carboxylic oxygens of Thr107 and Ala111. In all cases aminopyridines are perpendicular to the axis of the pore. 4-aminoquinoleine binds to the carboxylic oxygen of Ala111. Due to its large size, the molecular plane is parallel to the axis of the pore. The charge distributions and the structures of the binding complexes suggest that the interaction is driven by formation of several hydrogen bonds. We find 2-aminopyridine, 3-aminopyridine, 4-aminopyridine, and 3,4-diaminopyridine with similar binding energy. Considering the standard error of the estimate of the AutoDock force field, this energy should lie, as a rough estimation, in the interval 3-7 kcal mol(-1). On the other hand, 4-aminoquinoleine seems to have a smaller binding energy.

This study examined absorption properties of 2-styrylpyridine, trans-2-(m-cyanostyryl)pyridine, trans-2-[3-methyl-(m-cyanostyryl)]pyridine, and trans-4-(m-cyanostyryl)pyridine compounds based on theoretical UV/Vis spectra, with comparisons between time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) using B3LYP, PBE0, and LC-ωPBE functionals. Basis sets 6-31G(d), 6-31G(d,p), 6-31+G(d,p), and 6-311+G(d,p) were tested to compare molecular orbital energy values, gap energies, and maxima absorption wavelengths. UV/Vis spectra were calculated from fully optimized geometry in B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) in gas phase and using the IEFPCM model. B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) provided the most stable form, a planar structure with parameters close to 2-styrylpyridine X-ray data. Isomeric structures were evaluated by full geometry optimization using the same theory level. Similar energetic values were found: ~4.5 kJ mol(-1) for 2-styrylpyridine and ~1 kJ mol(-1) for derivative compound isomers. The 2-styrylpyridine isomeric structure differed at the pyridine group N-atom position; structures considered for the other compounds had the cyano group attached to the phenyl ring m-position equivalent. The energy difference was almost negligible between m-cyano-substituted molecules, but high energy barriers existed for cyano-substituted phenyl ring torsion. TD-DFT appeared to be robust and accurate approach. The B3LYP functional with the 6-31G(d) basis set produced the most reliable λmax values, with mean errors of 0.5 and 12 nm respect to experimental values, in gas and solution, respectively. The present data describes effects on the λmax changes in the UV/Vis absorption spectra of the electron acceptor cyano substituent on the phenyl ring, the electron donor methyl substituent, and the N-atom position on the electron acceptor pyridine ring, causing slight changes respect to the 2-styrylpyridine title compound.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract