No abstract

No abstract

on Defeating Alzheimer's Disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society Dementia includes a range of neurological disorders characterized by memory loss and cognitive impairment. The most common early symptom is difficulties remembering recent events. With the development of the disease, symptoms occur such as disorientation, mood swings, confusion, more serious memory loss, behavioural changes, difficulties in speaking and swallowing, as well as walking. Alzheimer Disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia (50-70% of dementia cases). Increasing age is the most important risk factor for AD.In 2012 and 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) presented reports suggesting that Alzheimer Disease and other dementias (ADOD) should be regarded as a global public health priority 1,2 . Similar policy declarations have been presented by the European Union 3 , as well as by some individual countries. These policy declarations acknowledge trends that sometimes are described in terms of an epidemic or a "time-bomb". In 2015, the number of people affected by dementia worldwide is estimated to be almost 47 million and the numbers are expected to reach 75 million by 2030 and 131 million by 2050, with the greatest increase in low and middle income countries. The main reason for the increase is the global aging trend, since dementias are associated with a high age-specific prevalence, i.e., increasing prevalence with higher age. The global economic costs of dementia were estimated to be more than 600 billion USD in 2010 6 and 818 billion USD in 2015 5 . The direct costs in the medical and social care sectors, 487 billion USD, represent 0.65% of the aggregated global gross domestic products (GDP), which is an enormous economic impact of a single group of disorders, especially considering that 87% of the costs occur in high income countries. Care of people with dementia impacts several sectors in the society with the social care (long term care and home services) and informal care sectors constituting the greatest proportions -even greater than direct medical care 6 . In cost of illness studies, European cost estimates in 2010 ranged between 238,6 billion USD 6 and 105,6 billion € 7 .However, the economic and societal burden of ADOD corresponds to the aggregate burden of people with dementia and their next of kin. The progressive nature of dementia can influence the whole life situation for families over many years. So far, no cure or substantial symptom relieving treatment is available for ADOD. Thus, the impact of this terminal disease is already today enormous, and given the predictions for the future, ADOD represents an enormous challenge for any society, and particularly to the ageing European society.Further knowledge is needed regarding the causes of ADOD. A more complete understanding of the disease mechanisms is required for new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. There is also a need to establish new cell-based and animal models representing, as far as possible, major clinical component...

No abstract

No abstract

The modern era of drug development for Alzheimer’s disease began with the proposal of the cholinergic hypothesis of memory impairment and the 1984 research criteria for Alzheimer’s disease. Since then, despite the evaluation of numerous potential treatments in clinical trials, only four cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine have shown sufficient safety and efficacy to allow marketing approval at an international level. Although this is probably because the other drugs tested were ineffective, inadequate clinical development methods have also been blamed for the failures. Here we review the development of treatments for Alzheimer’s disease during the past 30 years, considering the drugs, potential targets, late-stage clinical trials, development methods, emerging use of biomarkers and evolution of regulatory considerations in order to summarize advances and anticipate future developments. We have considered late-stage Alzheimer’s disease drug development from 1984 to 2013, including individual clinical trials, systematic and qualitative reviews, meta-analyses, methods, commentaries, position papers and guidelines. We then review the evolution of drugs in late clinical development, methods, biomarkers and regulatory issues. Although a range of small molecules and biological products against many targets have been investigated in clinical trials, the predominant drug targets have been the cholinergic system and the amyloid cascade. Trial methods have evolved incrementally: inclusion criteria have largely remained focused on mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease criteria, recently extending to early or prodromal Alzheimer disease or ‘mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease’, for drugs considered to be disease modifying. The duration of trials has remained at 6 to 12 months for drugs intended to improve symptoms; 18- to 24-month trials have been established for drugs expected to attenuate clinical course. Cognitive performance, activities of daily living, global change and severity ratings have persisted as the primary clinically relevant outcomes. Regulatory guidance and oversight have evolved to allow for enrichment of early-stage Alzheimer’s disease trial samples by using biomarkers and phase-specific outcomes. In conclusion, validated drug targets for Alzheimer’s disease remain to be developed. Only drugs that affect an aspect of cholinergic function have shown consistent, but modest, clinical effects in late-phase trials. There is opportunity for substantial improvements in drug discovery and clinical development methods.

Characterization of the genetic landscape of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias (ADD) provides a unique opportunity for a better understanding of the associated pathophysiological processes. We performed a two-stage genome-wide association study totaling 111,326 clinically diagnosed/‘proxy’ AD cases and 677,663 controls. We found 75 risk loci, of which 42 were new at the time of analysis. Pathway enrichment analyses confirmed the involvement of amyloid/tau pathways and highlighted microglia implication. Gene prioritization in the new loci identified 31 genes that were suggestive of new genetically associated processes, including the tumor necrosis factor alpha pathway through the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex. We also built a new genetic risk score associated with the risk of future AD/dementia or progression from mild cognitive impairment to AD/dementia. The improvement in prediction led to a 1.6- to 1.9-fold increase in AD risk from the lowest to the highest decile, in addition to effects of age and the APOE ε4 allele.

The FINGER is at the forefront of international collaborative efforts to solve the clinical and public health problems of early identification of individuals at increased risk of late-life cognitive impairment, and of developing intervention strategies to prevent or delay the onset of cognitive impairment and dementia.