Sarcopenia, the age associated loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, has considerable societal consequences for the development of frailty, disability and health care planning. A group of geriatricians and scientists from academia and industry met in Rome, Italy on November 18, 2009 to arrive at a consensus definition of sarcopenia. The current consensus definition was approved unanimously by the meeting participants and is as follows: Sarcopenia is defined as the age-associated loss of skeletal muscle mass and function. The causes of sarcopenia are multi-factorial and can include disuse, altered endocrine function, chronic diseases, inflammation, insulin resistance, and nutritional deficiencies. While cachexia may be a component of sarcopenia, the two conditions are not the same. The diagnosis of sarcopenia should be considered in all older patients who present with observed declines in physical function, strength, or overall health. Sarcopenia should specifically be considered in patients who are bedridden, cannot independently rise from a chair, or who have a measured gait speed less that 1.0 m·s−1. Patients who meet these criteria should further undergo body composition assessment using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with sarcopenia being defined using currently validated definitions. A diagnosis of sarcopenia is consistent with a gait speed of less than 1 m·s−1 and an objectively measured low muscle mass (eg: appendicular mass relative to ht2 that is ≤ 7.23 kg/ m2 in men ≤ 5.67 kg/ m2 in men). Sarcopenia is a highly prevalent condition in older persons that leads to disability, hospitalization and death.

During the past decade, a conceptual shift occurred in the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD) considering the disease as a continuum. Thanks to evolving biomarker research and substantial discoveries, it is now possible to identify the disease even at the preclinical stage before the occurrence of the first clinical symptoms. This preclinical stage of AD has become a major research focus as the field postulates that early intervention may offer the best chance of therapeutic success. To date, very little evidence is established on this "silent" stage of the disease. A clarification is needed about the definitions and lexicon, the limits, the natural history, the markers of progression, and the ethical consequence of detecting the disease at this asymptomatic stage. This article is aimed at addressing all the different issues by providing for each of them an updated review of the literature and evidence, with practical recommendations.

on Defeating Alzheimer's Disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society Dementia includes a range of neurological disorders characterized by memory loss and cognitive impairment. The most common early symptom is difficulties remembering recent events. With the development of the disease, symptoms occur such as disorientation, mood swings, confusion, more serious memory loss, behavioural changes, difficulties in speaking and swallowing, as well as walking. Alzheimer Disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia (50-70% of dementia cases). Increasing age is the most important risk factor for AD.In 2012 and 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) presented reports suggesting that Alzheimer Disease and other dementias (ADOD) should be regarded as a global public health priority 1,2 . Similar policy declarations have been presented by the European Union 3 , as well as by some individual countries. These policy declarations acknowledge trends that sometimes are described in terms of an epidemic or a "time-bomb". In 2015, the number of people affected by dementia worldwide is estimated to be almost 47 million and the numbers are expected to reach 75 million by 2030 and 131 million by 2050, with the greatest increase in low and middle income countries. The main reason for the increase is the global aging trend, since dementias are associated with a high age-specific prevalence, i.e., increasing prevalence with higher age. The global economic costs of dementia were estimated to be more than 600 billion USD in 2010 6 and 818 billion USD in 2015 5 . The direct costs in the medical and social care sectors, 487 billion USD, represent 0.65% of the aggregated global gross domestic products (GDP), which is an enormous economic impact of a single group of disorders, especially considering that 87% of the costs occur in high income countries. Care of people with dementia impacts several sectors in the society with the social care (long term care and home services) and informal care sectors constituting the greatest proportions -even greater than direct medical care 6 . In cost of illness studies, European cost estimates in 2010 ranged between 238,6 billion USD 6 and 105,6 billion € 7 .However, the economic and societal burden of ADOD corresponds to the aggregate burden of people with dementia and their next of kin. The progressive nature of dementia can influence the whole life situation for families over many years. So far, no cure or substantial symptom relieving treatment is available for ADOD. Thus, the impact of this terminal disease is already today enormous, and given the predictions for the future, ADOD represents an enormous challenge for any society, and particularly to the ageing European society.Further knowledge is needed regarding the causes of ADOD. A more complete understanding of the disease mechanisms is required for new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. There is also a need to establish new cell-based and animal models representing, as far as possible, major clinical component...