Olfactory function appears to be influenced by repeated odor stimulation. We conducted a nonrandomized, nonblinded, retrospective study of the impact of an 8-month period of olfactory training in patients with olfactory dysfunction. Our study population was made up of 46 adults-14 men and 32 women (mean age: 59.17 ± 13.25 yr)-with olfactory dysfunction of different etiologies (sinonasal: n = 15; post-upper-respiratory-tract infection [URTI]: n = 16; post-traumatic: n = 7; and idiopathic: n = 8). All patients had been previously treated without success with systemic or topical corticosteroids. For their training, patients exposed themselves to four different odors twice a day. Olfactory function was evaluated at baseline and again at 4 and 8 months, and results were quantified in the form of each patient's TDI (threshold, discrimination, and identification) score. Of the 46 patients, 28 had undergone olfactory training only, while the remaining 18 had received topical corticosteroids in addition to training. At study's end, the mean overall TDI score in the entire group increased by 4.09 points over baseline-a statistically significant increase (p = 0.01); this increase was mainly attributable to improvement in the identification component of the TDI, which increased by 2.51 points (p = 0.02). Among the 18 patients who received a topical corticosteroid in addition to training, the mean TDI increased by 6.83 points (p = 0.001), primarily because of improvements in the discrimination and identification components. The 28 patients who underwent olfactory training alone experienced a mean increase in the identification component of only 2.20 points (p = 0.14) after 8 months. Olfactory function in the post-URTI patients increased significantly at 4 months. We conclude that olfactory discrimination and identification can be enhanced by the addition of a topical corticosteroid to a program of defined, daily, short-term exposure to olfactory training.

No abstract

This study confirms the incidence of olfactory disorder in MS patients that has been reported in the literature. Interestingly, a significant correlation between orthonasal and retronasal OF testing was not shown. A higher incidence of gustatory dysfunction was shown and might serve as another potential marker for this disease.

No abstract

The reporting quality of publications of clinical trials can affect the quality of clinical decision-making. We systematically assessed the quality of publications of large multicenter trials evaluating immunosuppressive regimens in de novo kidney transplantation. Study quality, reporting quality and accessibility of the results of 63 publications were assessed independently by three blinded investigators using an instrument combining the Jadad scale with a list of reporting quality items. Study quality was rated with an average of only 2.3 (range 1-5) on the Jadad scale. Unblinded studies were reported in 68.3% of publications and follow-up longer than 12 months was reported for only 13 out of 50 studies. The reviewed publications fulfilled an average of 69.1% of the reporting quality criteria. Fifty-four percent of publications did not report both treated and biopsy-proven rejections. Whether reported graft survival was censored for death could not be determined for 27% of publications. Only a few publications gave confidence intervals (CIs) or stated whether additional analyses were pre-specified. Even the largest trials of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation show considerable quality deficits in their design and publication. Additional efforts are required of investigators, editors and sponsors to achieve maximum study and reporting quality.

BackgroundOlfactory dysfunction in MS patients is reported in the literature. MRI of the olfactory bulb (OB) is discussed as a promising new testing method for measuring olfactory function (OF).Aim of this study was to explore reasons for and optimize the detection of olfactory dysfunction in MS patients with MRI.Materials and MethodsOB and olfactory brain volume was assessed within 34 MS patients by manual segmentation. Olfactory function was tested using the Threshold-Discrimination-Identification-Test (TDI), gustatory function was tested using Taste Strips (TST).Results41% of the MS patients displayed olfactory dysfunction (8% of the control group), 16% displayed gustatory dysfunction (5% of the control group). There was a correlation between the OB volume and the number and volume of MS lesions in the olfactory brain. Olfactory brain volume correlated with the volume of lesions in the olfactory brain and the EDSS score. The TST score correlated with the number and volume of lesions in the olfactory brain.ConclusionThe correlation between a higher number and volume of MS lesions with a decreased OB and olfactory brain volume could help to explain olfactory dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Some studies reported olfactory dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). There is no agreement about the most suitable testing method for measuring olfactory function (OF) in MS patients. Recent studies showed that olfactory bulb volume changes with the degree of olfactory dysfunction. We assessed olfactory bulb volume of MS patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and related it to the OF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Volumetric measurements of the right and left olfactory bulb (OB) were performed by manual segmentation within 36 MS patients. Psychophysical testing of the orthonasal OF was performed using threshold-discrimination-identification (TDI) score in MS patients. RESULTS: Of all MS patients, 44.4% displayed olfactory dysfunction. The TDI score of all 36 MS patients, especially the score of the Identification subtest correlated strongly with neurological scores typical of MS. In patients with a decreased OB volume, there was a positive correlation between volumetry of the OB and OF. CONCLUSION: OB volumes may provide valuable information about MS patients with olfactory dysfunction. The TDI test and Identification subtest were very sensitive in detecting olfactory dysfunction in MS patients.

The olfactory (OF) and gustatory function in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and possible influencing variables of the disease, such as depression or fatigue, were determined. In an open prospective controlled clinical study 30 patients with MS and 30 healthy controls matched for age, sex and smoking-habits were investigated. With Mini Mental State Examination cognitive dysfunction was excluded, with Expanded Disability Status Scale the patient's ability to accomplish the tests was ensured. The severity of depression was measured with the self-reported Beck Depression Inventory. The orthonasal olfactory function was derived with olfactory event related potentials (OERP) and TDI-score (Threshold, Discrimination and Identification, Sniffin' Sticks). Retronasal olfactory function was tested with Taste-Powder-score, gustatory function with Taste-strip-score. There was a significant loss of olfactory function measured with TDI-score [12/30 (40%), p = 0.002] and gustatory function [5/23 (21.7%), p \ 0.001] in MS-patients, 23.8% (5/21) of MS-patients showed hyposmia with OERPs, significantly correlating with the TDI-score (p = 0.03). The Expanded Disability Status scale score inversely correlated with the TDI-score (p = 0.002). This study confirms the incidence of olfactory disorder in MS-patients and reveals a frequent gustatory deficit. The Identification subtest can be proposed as a marker of the OF in MS-patients: it includes complex cognitive tasks and may be influenced by depression and fatigue, which are common symptoms of MS. It inversely correlates with the disability status.