2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of olfactory dysfunction of different etiologies in MRI and comparison with subjective and objective olfactometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We were able to observe a correlation between olfactory-evoked potential latencies and bulb volume in patients with MS. We have previously reported a correlation in patients with post-viral, post-traumatic, and idiopathic olfactory dysfunction [20]. In the reported study, patients with a smaller olfactory bulb volume exhibited longer H 2 S latencies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…We were able to observe a correlation between olfactory-evoked potential latencies and bulb volume in patients with MS. We have previously reported a correlation in patients with post-viral, post-traumatic, and idiopathic olfactory dysfunction [20]. In the reported study, patients with a smaller olfactory bulb volume exhibited longer H 2 S latencies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…If all stimuli showed an evoked P2 potential the patient was classified normosmic. If one side did not show any potential the patient was categorized hyposmic and if both sides did not show any response the patient was considered complete anosmic [16].…”
Section: Main Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This treatment success was accompanied by high overall patient satisfaction with a median score of 8 [5][6][7][8][9] in the entire sample of patients: 8 [5.75-8.25] in the study group and 7 [5-9.5] in the control group. Concerning the impact of co-variables on the outcome after ITR, regression analysis revealed the initial TDI score to have a statistically significant influence (r c = -0.36, P = 0.05), indicating that lower initial scores resulted in higher postoperative increases in TDI.…”
Section: Postoperative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olfactory function was assessed using the ''Sniffin' Sticks'' test battery. VAS showed very low median values for intraoperative pain (0) [0-1.20] and high postoperative patient satisfaction (8) [5][6][7][8][9]. After 2 months there was no significant improvement of objective olfactory function as measured by the TDI score (threshold, discrimination and identification).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation