Objective:Develop a cross-cultural translation, Swedish to Spanish, of TOOL questionnaire - a previously validated instrument to assess the impact of adverse effects (AE) on the health utilities and health related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.Methods:TOOL questionnaire has 8 attributes and 4 levels per domain: mood (anxiety and depression), function capabilities, and AE frequently associated with antipsychotics (fatigue-weakness, weight gain, stiffness-tremor, physical restlessness, sexual dysfunction, and vertigo-nausea). Firstly, 4 independent translators carried out the forward-backward translations. Next, draft version was reviewed by an experts panel (5 psychiatrists & 1 GP specialized in HRQoL) and tested in 40 stable patients (20 schizophrenic & 20 bipolar). Comprehension and importance (C/I) of each item were evaluated by a Likert scale ranging from 0 (lowest level) to 4 (highest level).Results:3 items should be modified to facilitate comprehension: mood, physical restlessness and vertigo-nausea. However, C/I of items mean scores were respectively: mood (3.50/ 2.37); function capabilities (2.58/ 2.03); fatigue-weakness (3.58/ 2.55); weight gain- (3.75/ 2.87); stiffness-tremor (3.65/ 2.61); restlessness (3.37/ 2.62); sexual dysfunction (3.39/ 2.51) and vertigo-nausea (3.56/ 2.44). Only 2 patients (5%) were unable to complete the questionnaire. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach α= 0.87) and neither item ceiling nor floor effects were found.Conclusions:The Swedish TOOL questionaire was culturally adapted into Spanish. Psychometric analyses are needed to validate this measure in Spain. A multtiatribute utility fuction should be estimated to evaluate AE by using a patients"centered perspective.
BackgroundImproving health of children and adolescents is crucial for their overall development. Therefore, it is essential to explore factors that may influence their health at both the public health and school system levels.ObjectiveThis study compares physical fitness components and waist-height-to-ratio (WHtR) in adolescents according to school uniforms, namely the traditional uniform (i.e., shirt and school necktie in boys and skirt and blouse in girls) and the sports uniform (i.e., polo shirts or t-shirts and sport or short trousers). Additionally, it seeks to investigate potential differences in these measures based on sex and school type (i.e., public, subsidized, and private).MethodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the Chilean national learning outcome assessment system (SIMCE)–2014 and involved 8,030 adolescents. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and muscular fitness (MF) were measured. WHtR was assessed as a health cardiovascular indicator. Mixed models and ANCOVA were performed to compare uniform types, adjusting for multiple covariates. value of p and effect size (ES) was used to establish significant results.ResultsOverall, sports uniforms (SU) were linked to higher CRF (p < 0.001) than the traditional uniform (TU). Boys from private schools wearing SU presented higher CRF (p = 0.016; ES = 0.37), and a positive trend was observed for MF (p = 0.645; ES = 0.21). In subsidized, a trend was found in CRF (p = 0.005; ES = 0.16). Girls wearing SU from private schools showed a positive trend in CRF (p = 0.167; ES = 0.28). Trends in WHtR were found in both sexes from private (p = 0.555; ES = 0.24; p = 0.444; ES = 0.25, respectively).ConclusionWearing SU seems a promissory alternative to promote healthy physical fitness and body composition at the educational level. However, the relationship between higher physical activity and CRF, MF, and lower WHtR due to SU must be verified. Finally, when deciding to implement this measure, special attention must be paid to boys from public schools and girls from all types of schools.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.