This study aims to examine copyright infringement that occurs in prank videos uploaded on YouTube social media. The next goal is to find out how the criteria for prank videos that can be said to violate copyright are categorized as cinematographic works. This research was conducted by taking data samples from several cases of viral prank videos in cyberspace and then completing them with the latest data from the Intellectual Property of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of South Sulawesi Province. Data collection techniques using document studies, interviews, and online surveys. Meanwhile, data analysis was carried out in a qualitative form descriptively and systematically. The results indicate the videos with prank content on Youtube have harmed the parties involved in making these prank videos. The most disadvantaged party is the prank target, both morally and economically, exacerbated by regulations that have not provided optimal legal protection. The regulations in relation are Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, Law Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting, and Law Number 33 of 2009 concerning Film. Furthermore, many YouTubers do not fulfill related rights, namely the moral rights of parties in video content, while the fulfillment of these rights has been regulated in the Copyright Law. Therefore, the responsibility of the relevant parties, namely Youtubers and the Government represented by the Intellectual Property Officer of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, is essential to do synergy in preventing copyright infringement.
Law enforcement efforts against copyright infringement in Indonesia are regulated as a complaint offense under Article 120 of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. Complaint offense implementation had connected with one consideration suggested that the officials having difficulty to distinguish between an original work and a copy. Referring to normative study that has been conducted, the complaint offense is irrelevant since it restricts law enforcement capacity of providing copyright protection. Appropriately, to protect creators and/or copyright holders whose rights have been violated, the officials should take an action without waiting for a complaint about the presence of copyright infringement.IntisariUpaya penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran hak cipta di Indonesia diatur sebagai delik aduan berdasarkan Pasal 120 Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Delik aduan berlaku dengan salah satu pertimbangan bahwa aparat penegak hukum kerap sulit membedakan ciptaan yang asli dengan tiruannya. Bersumber pada pengkajian normatif yang telah dilakukan, delik aduan tidak relevan diterapkan karena membatasi ruang gerak penegakan hukum dalam memberikan pelindungan hukum untuk berkarya. Sepatutnya, untuk melindungi pencipta dan/atau pemegang hak cipta yang dilanggar haknya, aparat penegak hukum dapat bertindak tanpa harus menunggu aduan pada pelanggaran hak cipta yang terjadi.
According to Indonesia Foundation Law, No. 16/ 2001, as amended by Law No. 28/2001, article 1(1) stipulates that Foundation is a legal entity that has separated assets to achieve specific objectives in the social, religious, and humanitarian fields, which has no members. Importantly, this regulation has required a Foundation to have legal entities status. In fact, some Foundations in Indonesia have existed, and continuously functioning performs business activity without having legal entities status. This phenomenon should be banned as clearly regulated in the Law that foundations shall not be drawn on as platforms of business unless through other business entities. Keywords: Foundation, Articles of Association.
At the time of the accident on the Lion Air flight JT 610, there were many ideas to close the flight operating permit. In fact, if reviewed further, for whatever reason, in some "corners", there are other rights that have not even received legal certainty about their protection. One of them is about airline ticket agents. Basically, according to the Consumer Protection Act, protection is not only given to consumers but businesses are also included in carrying out their trading activities. Business actors reach up to the airline agents. Moreover, before having a ticket sales permit, the agent must make a deposit to the airline ticket being sold. However, the protection that should be given in the laws and regulations does not explain the airline's obligation to return deposits to travel agents, who are likely to suffer fatal losses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.