No abstract

The aim of the study was to compare in a randomized controlled clinical trial the use of the piezoelectric osteotomy as an alternative to the conventional approach in terms of surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, cut quality, nerve injury, and costs.One hundred ten patients who had orthognathic surgery procedures with bimaxillary osteotomy were divided into 2 groups: group A was treated with a piezosurgery device, and group B, with a reciprocating saw and bur.The piezosurgical bone osteotomy permitted individualized cut designs. The surgical time in group A was reduced, with a mean for the mandibular osteotomy (1 side) between 3 minutes 31 seconds and 5 minutes 2 seconds, whereas in group B, the surgical time was between 7 minutes 23 seconds and 10 minutes 22 seconds. The surgical time in group A for the Le Fort I osteotomy was between 5 minutes 17 seconds and 7 minutes 55 seconds in group A and between 8 minutes 38 seconds and 15 minutes 11 seconds in group B. All patients in group A had a low blood loss (<300 mL) versus patients of group B who had a medium to high blood loss (medium loss: 400 mL, high loss: >500 mL). Inferior alveolar nerve sensation was retained in 98.2% of group A versus 92.7% in group B at 6 months postoperative testing.Piezoelectric osteotomy reduced surgical time, blood loss, and inferior alveolar nerve injury in bimaxillary osteotomy. Absence of macrovibrations makes the instrument more manageable and easy to use and allows greater intraoperative control with higher safety in cutting in difficult anatomical regions.

ObjectiveLocal anaesthetics are very commonly used drugs in dentistry, and people who undergo procedures with local anaesthetics often refer adverse reactions that are not of allergic origin. Considering that in dentistry contact with allergens is very frequent, it is essential to assess the real incidence of allergy to local anaesthetics.Subjects and MethodsWe evaluated a group of 159 patients in whom adverse reaction occurred after procedures with local anaesthetics.ResultsThe reactions between allergy to local anaesthetic (immediate and delayed) and certain symptoms presented by patients were investigated. Allergy to latex and chlorexidine were investigated in all patients. Only one patient, who previously presented a constant erythema at the wrist after procedure with local anaesthetics, was positive to Mepivacaine patch test. Two patients were positive to latex and one to chlorexidine.ConclusionsThe main finding of this study was that a reaction registered in the medical history and reported by a patient is rarely allergic but the use of vasoconstrictors or emotional factors may account for it. However, a complete allergological investigation is necessary for a correct diagnosis and future management.

Structured Abstract Objectives To analyse through comet assay and micronucleus test the viability and DNA damage occurred in buccal mucosa epithelial cells after a short‐term exposure to Andresen activator resin monomers. Setting and Sample Population Test group consisting of 26 subjects was treated with Andresen activator; 16 subjects who had never undergone orthodontic treatment were enrolled in the control group. Material & Methods Buccal mucosa samples were collected before treatment and after 7, 15, 30, 60 and 90 days. The analyses performed on the cells included the following: cellular viability, comet assay and micronucleus test. Mean ± SD were calculated for cellular viability, tail moment, tail intensity, tail length, micronuclei, binuclear and bud cells. Significance (P < 0.05) was evaluated with Dunnett's test. Results Cellular viability did not change during observational time, and its trend was similar to the controls. Tail moment and tail intensity significantly increased after 30 and 60 days, respectively, whereas tail length remained unchanged over time in the test group; the same parameters did not change in the control group. In the test group, micronuclei, binuclear and bud cells significantly increased after 30, 60 and 90 days, respectively. Conclusion The resin monomers of the Andresen activator cause genotoxic effects detectable through comet assay and micronucleus test, but they do not produce clear cytotoxic effects after a 90 days exposure.

No abstract