2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo study on metal release from fixed orthodontic appliances and DNA damage in oral mucosa cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
150
3
18

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
13
150
3
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Faccioni et al presented 3 forms damaging the DNA structure (comets, apoptosis and viability), whereas other authors presented one in different units. 17,[19][20][21][22][23] The results presented by Angelieri et al and Heravi et al showed that the micronucleus frequencies were not significantly different before, during and after orthodontic treatment, and are in contrast with those of Natarajan et al, who found a significantly higher MN count in the test group at the day of debonding as compared to the control group without appliances. 20,22,23 Hafez et al 19 found that the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of orthodontic appliances remained in the mouth for 6 months.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Faccioni et al presented 3 forms damaging the DNA structure (comets, apoptosis and viability), whereas other authors presented one in different units. 17,[19][20][21][22][23] The results presented by Angelieri et al and Heravi et al showed that the micronucleus frequencies were not significantly different before, during and after orthodontic treatment, and are in contrast with those of Natarajan et al, who found a significantly higher MN count in the test group at the day of debonding as compared to the control group without appliances. 20,22,23 Hafez et al 19 found that the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of orthodontic appliances remained in the mouth for 6 months.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Faccioni et al and Amini et alreport a double or triple increase in the level of nickel and cobalt ions in the cells of cheek mucosa epithelium. 17,18 Statistically significant differences were observed for cobalt (Co) 17 , nickel (Ni) 17,18 and chromium (Cr) 19 . In another study, the differences between cobalt and chromium were not statistically significant, although the p-level was low (0.09 and 0.10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[28][29][30][31][32] In this study, buccal mucosa cells were evaluated only 30 days after removal of the brackets, because Jones et al 22 recommend that if a lesion persists for longer than 14 days after removal of the causative factors, a biopsy should be performed immediately. Therefore, within 30 days, cells should have returned to their initial size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When viewed under a microscope, a cell has the appearance of a comet, with head (the nuclear region) and tail containing DNA fragments or strands migrating in the direction of the anode. In particular, this assay seems important for the investigation of suspected genotoxins in vitro 21 and in vivo 5 . As a result and because of inappropriate evidence, the purpose of this study was to investigate, by the single cell gel (comet) assay in vitro, whether sodium fluoride (NaF) induces DNA breakage in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%