The existence of neuroanatomical and neurobehavioral abnormalities in patients with first-episode schizophrenia indicates that the brain dysfunction occurred before clinical presentation. However, there is also evidence of progression, in which anatomical changes may affect some clinical and neurobehavioral features of the illness in some patients.
One current view of schizophrenia is that its clinical and functional features show a deteriorating course, particularly for negative symptoms. However, this is difficult to study in chronic patients who have been exposed to pharmacologic treatment and institutionalization. Examining first-episode (FE) patients can help clarify which symptoms are present initially and how the symptom pattern is linked to functioning. We evaluated a sample of 37 FE patients with schizophrenia and compared them to 70 other schizophrenia (OS) patients on standard clinical scales, measures of premorbid functioning, and quality of life. FE patients showed a symptom profile similar to OS patients; in particular, there was no evidence that negative symptoms are less severe in the FE group. Analysis of the clinical data led us to the conclusion that the symptom profile of schizophrenia exists at the outset, that negative symptoms are associated with poor premorbid and current functioning, but that the role of positive symptoms is more complex and may vary in subtypes.
There are no resting metabolic abnormalities in any brain region, but abnormal gradients are evident. These vary in subtypes, and laterality is associated with functioning. The results support the hypothesis of temporolimbic disturbance in schizophrenia that is all ready present at the onset of illness.
This study explored the roles of referent power (i.e., influence based on sense of identification) and expert power (i.e., influence based on knowledge and expertise) in Schizophrenics Anonymous (SA), a mutual-help group for persons experiencing a schizophrenia-related illness. The study describes SA participants' experience of referent and expert power with SA members, SA leaders, and with mental health professionals. It also examines whether or not referent and expert power ascribed to fellow SA participants predicts the perceived helpfulness of the group. One hundred fifty-six SA participants were surveyed. Participants reported experiencing higher levels of referent power with fellow SA members and leaders than with mental health professionals. They reported higher levels of expert power for mental health professionals and SA leaders than for SA members. The respondents' ratings of their SA group's helpfulness was significantly correlated with ratings of referent and expert power. Although expert power was the best independent predictor of helpfulness, a significant interaction between referent and expert power indicated that when members reported high referent power, expert power was not related to helpfulness. These results are interpreted to suggest that there are multiple forms of social influence at work in mutual help.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.