Tujuan penelitian dilakukan adalah mengetahui penyebab terjadinya ketidaksesuaian perjanjian jual beli tanah yang didasarkan pada KUHPerdata maupun UUPA. Dalam melakukan penelitian penulis akan menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif analistis, yaitu penelitian yang bertujuan menganalisis permasalahan jual beli tanah menurut undang-undang, teori-teori hukum dan praktak pelaksanaan hukum positif yang menyangkut permasalahan mengenai perjanjian yang telah dibuat berdasrkan KUHPerdata maupun UUPA. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa pembuatan akta tanah yang tidak sesuai dengan tata cara pembuatan akta disebabkan oleh beberapa faktor diantaranya yaitu :(1) tujuan menyelematkan transaksi jual beli yang dilakukan oleh PPAT, (2) terjalinnya rasa saling percaya antara para pihak dengan PPAT, (3) adanya kesibukan dari berbagai pihak yang akan melakukan perjanjian jual beli sehingga membuat PPAT yang menyesuaikan waktu untuk dapat melakukan perjanjian jual beli kedua pihak, (4) alasan untuk efisiensi waktu bagi para pihak, (5) besarnya nilai transaksi jual beli yang akan dilakukan dengan demikian PPAT mau mengikuti kemauan para pihak yang akan membuat perjanjian jual beli, (6) adanya hubungan yang baik, serta (7) permintaan dari para pihak yang akan membuat perjanjian jual beli.
Pembatalan hak desain industri yang telah terdaftar, bisa terjadi karena 2 (dua) hal, yaitu berdasarkan atas permintaan pemegang hak desain industri dan berdasarkan putusan pengadilan atas gugatan yang diajukan oleh pihak lain. Akan tetapi, pengajuan gugatan oleh pihak lain tersebut tidak dapat serta merta diterima oleh pengadilan bilamana suatu desain industri telah mendaftarkan hak desain industri nya ke Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Namun dalam praktik tetap saja ada oknum yang menggunakan hak desain tersebut secara melawan hak dengan mendapatkan manfaat ekonomi yang besar dari hak desain industri milik dari pendesain industri yang telah terdaftar. Oleh karena itu tujuan penulisan ini untuk menganalisis ketentuan hukum mengenai unsur kebaruan dalam suatu produk desain industri yang menjadi landasan yuridis diajukannya gugatan pembatalan hak desain industri yang telah terdaftar berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2000 tentang desain Industri serta menganalisis perlindungan hukum nya dengan suatu studi kasus gugatan pembatalan desain industri pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.407.K/PDT.SUS/HKI/2019.
This study aims to find out about the Provisions for Submission of Applications for Guardianship After the Birth of the Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 29 of 2019. The method used in writing this journal is the Qualitative Method with data collection techniques, namely library research which is collected and analyzed using descriptive techniques. Based on the results of the research, it shows that the provisions for child guardianship have been strictly regulated based on the Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 29 of 2019 which states that a guardian is a person or entity that in reality exercises parental authority over a child. Furthermore, Article 1 paragraph 2 states that parents are biological fathers and/or mothers, or fathers and/or stepmothers, or adoptive fathers and/or mothers. Furthermore, Article 1 paragraph 3 states that a child is someone who is not yet (eighteen) years old, including a child who is still in the womb. Legal Procedures for Application for Guardianship After the Birth of Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 29 of 2019 must meet the requirements as stipulated in the Government Regulation and be submitted by a person or legal entity as a potential guardian to the court. The application for the appointment of a guardian as referred to in paragraph (1) is submitted together with the application for the revocation of the guardianship. The application for the appointment of a guardian and the application for the revocation of custody which has been accepted by the Court shall be determined through trial. A person or legal entity is declared a guardian after obtaining a court order.
The purpose of this study is an attempt to analyze the legal protection of industrial design rights over lawsuits for cancellation of industrial design registrations. The research method used is using normative legal research methods with literature study data collection techniques, the analysis of this research is decision analysis. The result of this research is that the legal protection for the rights of industrial designers who have registered for the lawsuit for the cancellation of the registration of industrial designs is that the legal protection against the lawsuit for cancellation can be given through the registration mechanism. Protection can be obtained if an industrial design has been registered. This makes it easier to prove and protect even though the principle is from the emergence of industrial design matters. An industrial design right certificate can be issued at the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights which has an important role as proof of ownership for industrial design rights so that it does not have an element of novelty. The conclusion of this study is the legal considerations of the Supreme Court judges on the lawsuit for the cancellation of industrial design rights which have been registered in the Supreme Court's decision no. 407.K/PDT.SUS/HKI/2019 has fulfilled a sense of justice because it does not have a juridical basis and provides legal protection to registered industrial design rights as well as legal certainty if the plaintiff who files a lawsuit for the cancellation of the registered industrial design right cannot prove that the industrial design rights are in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.
Over time, the Notary Profession in carrying out his profession, from what was only known as a scribe manually, then a typewriter, until now uses technology- and application-based facilities. Among them, the term Cyber Notary is known in America, and in Europe, the period E-Notary is known. Research Objectives To identify and analyze the role of a notary, legal consequences for the role of a notary and identify and analyze constraints and solutions in electronically integrated business licensing services in the process of processing, analyzing and utilizing data in this study using qualitative methods. Data analysis using qualitative analysis techniques. Empirical Legal Research (Sociological Juridical). This research is descriptive and analytical. The study found that a notary's role in electronically integrated business licensing services is related only to an assistance service in providing comprehensive services to business actors/communities related to applications for making permits. To be able to use (OSS), the Business Entity first takes care of validating the deed of establishment or amending the act through the SABU Online application. Then the data is registered to apply for a permit for the OSS system. Forms of Notary Liability If one day an error occurs in inputting data, the Notary cannot be prosecuted in civil, administrative or ethical terms as long as the Notary carries out his profession based on applicable regulations and clients based on their rights and obligations. Constraints and Solutions in Electronically Integrated Business Licensing Services are the lack of socialization between the one-stop service to the community, the lack of notification to the wider community or seminars related to One-Stop Integrated Services through applications (OSS), causing inequality in the online system that makes it easier Public. If the statutory provisions do not regulate or do not regulate, then the minister, heads of institutions, governors and regents/mayors have the authority to make decisions and take necessary actions to resolve the obstacles and problems referred to as long as they are following general principles of good governance. (OSS) is expected to make it easier for people to open businesses that legally have permits, thereby creating many jobs that can improve people's living standards and the country's per capita income
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.