Radioimmunotherapy with (90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan is well tolerated and produces statistically and clinically significant higher ORR and CR compared with rituximab alone.

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing treatment for acute leukemia (AL). Antifungal prophylactic strategies are associated with significant toxicities and cost. We performed a retrospective study of the incidence and risk factors for IFD among patients newly diagnosed with and treated for AL between January 1, 2004 and July 1, 2006. Patient follow up concluded January 1, 2007. Among 231 patients with newly diagnosed AL, 31 (13.4%) developed IFD by the end of follow up, 24 (10.4%) of whom developed IFD within the first 100 days after diagnosis of AL. The cumulative probability of developing IFD was 5.9% by 30 days and 11.1% at 100 days after AL diagnosis. Patients who had persistent leukemia after an initial course of induction chemotherapy were significantly more likely to develop IFD than those who did not have evidence of persistent leukemia (14/65 (21.5%) vs. 15/148 (10.1%), P = 0.03). In a time‐dependent Cox model, the adjusted hazard ratio for developing IFD within the first 100 days of AL diagnosis based on the number of days of neutropenia in that period was 4.85 (95% confidence interval: 1.52, 15.4). Those patients with more days of neutropenia in the first 100 days after AL diagnosis, such as those who did not achieve remission after a first course of induction chemotherapy, were more likely to develop IFD. Am. J. Hematol., 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Rituximab plus hyper-CVAD alternating with rituximab plus high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine is effective in untreated aggressive MCL. Toxicity is significant but expected. Because of the shorter FFS concurrent with significant toxicity in patients more than 65 years of age, this regimen is not recommended as standard therapy for this age subgroup. Larger prospective randomized studies are needed to define the role of this regimen in the treatment of MCL patients compared with existing and new treatment modalities.

Localized and multicentric Castleman disease are different clinical disorders with overlapping histologic features. Localized disease can be cured with surgery, but complete remissions in patients with multicentric disease have been achieved only with chemotherapy or prednisone given at the time of diagnosis.

Bortezomib showed promising activity in relapsed mantle-cell lymphoma and encouraging results in other B-cell lymphomas. Future studies will explore bortezomib in combination with other cytotoxic or biologic agents.

BACKGROUND Although surgery is considered standard therapy for unicentric Castleman disease, favorable responses to radiotherapy also have been documented. The authors undertook this study to analyze the clinical factors, treatment approaches, and outcomes of patients with unicentric or multicentric Castleman disease, and to report the outcomes of patients with unicentric Castleman disease treated with radiotherapy. METHODS The authors reviewed the medical records of 22 patients who had received a histologic diagnosis of Castleman disease at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1988 and 1999. One patient with a concurrent histopathologic diagnosis of nonsecretory multiple myeloma was excluded from the study. In all patients, the diagnosis of Castleman disease was based on the results of lymph node biopsies. Disease was categorized as being either unicentric or multicentric and further subdivided into hyaline vascular, plasma cell, or mixed variant histologic types. Clinical variables and outcomes were analyzed according to treatment, which consisted of surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. RESULTS Records from 21 patients were analyzed: 12 had unicentric disease, and 9 had multicentric disease. The mean follow‐up time for the entire series was 51 months (median, 40 months). Four patients with unicentric disease were treated with radiotherapy alone: 2 remain alive and symptom free, 2 died of causes unrelated to Castleman disease and had no evidence of disease at last follow‐up. Eight patients with unicentric disease were treated with complete or partial surgical resection, and all are alive and asymptomatic. All nine patients with multicentric disease were treated with combination chemotherapy: five are alive with no evidence of disease, and four are alive with progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS Surgery results in excellent rates of cure in patients with unicentric Castleman disease; radiotherapy can also achieve clinical response and cure in selected patients. Multicentric Castleman disease is a more aggressive clinical entity and is most effectively treated with combination chemotherapy, whereas the role of radiotherapy in its treatment remains unclear. Cancer 2001;92:670–6. © 2001 American Cancer Society.

The clinical, laboratory, and survival characteristics of our RS patients were similar to those reported in earlier studies. Ig gene rearrangement and light-chain isotype analysis support a common origin for CLL and LCL. Despite progress in the treatment of CLL, the development of LCL remains a serious complication and continued surveillance in all CLL patients is warranted.

ESHAP was found to be an active, tolerable chemotherapy regimen for relapsing and refractory lymphoma. Applying a prognostic model based on tumor burden and serum LDH level shows significant differences in survival in this patient population.