Blockade of the pathway including Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and its receptor Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) has produced clinical benefits in patients with a variety of cancers. Elevated levels of soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) have been associated with worse prognosis in renal cell carcinoma and multiple myeloma. However, the regulatory roles and function of sPD-L1 particularly in connection with immune checkpoint blockade treatment are not fully understood. We identified four splice variants of PD-L1 in melanoma cells, and all of them are secreted. Secretion of sPD-L1 resulted from alternate splicing activities, cytokine induction, cell stress, cell injury and cell death in melanoma cells. Pretreatment levels of sPD-L1 were elevated in stage IV melanoma patient sera compared to healthy donors. High pre-treatment levels of sPD-L1 were associated with increased likelihood of progressive disease in patients treated by CTLA-4 or PD-1 blockade. Although changes in circulating sPD-L1 early after treatment could not distinguish responders from those with progressive disease, after five months of treatment by CTLA-4 or PD-1 blockade patients who had increased circulating sPD-L1 had greater likelihood of developing a partial response. Induction of sPD-L1 was associated with increased circulating cytokines after CTLA-4 blockade but not following PD-1 blockade. Circulating sPD-L1 is a prognostic biomarker that may predict outcomes for subgroups of patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors.

PURPOSE Effective management of fatigue in cancer patients requires a clear delineation of what constitutes nontrivial fatigue. We defined numeric cutpoints for fatigue severity based on functional interference and described fatigue’s prevalence and characteristics in cancer patients and survivors. METHODS In a multicenter study, outpatients with breast, prostate, colorectal, or lung cancer rated fatigue severity and symptom interference with functioning on the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) 0–10 scale. MDASI ratings of symptom interference guided selection of numeric rating cutpoints between mild, moderate, and severe fatigue levels. Regression analysis identified significant factors related to reporting moderate/severe fatigue. RESULTS The statistically optimal cutpoints were ≥4 for moderate fatigue and ≥7 for severe fatigue. Moderate/severe fatigue was reported by 45% (983/2177) of patients undergoing active treatment and was more likely to occur in patients taking strong opioids (odds ratio [OR], 3.00), had poor performance status (OR, 2.00), had >5% weight loss within 6 months (OR, 1.60), were taking >10 medications (OR, 1.58), had lung cancer (OR, 1.55), or had a history of depression (OR, 1.42). Among survivors (patients with complete remission or no evidence of disease, and no current cancer treatment), 29% (150/515) had moderate/severe fatigue that was associated with poor performance status (OR, 3.48) and a history of depression (OR, 2.21). CONCLUSION This study statistically defined fatigue-severity categories related to significantly increased symptom interference. The high prevalence of moderate/severe fatigue in both actively treated cancer patients and survivors warrants the promoting of routine assessment and management of patient-reported fatigue.

BACKGROUND A set of common cancer-related and treatment-related symptoms has been proposed for quality-of-care assessment and clinical research. Using data from a large, multicenter, prospective study, we assessed effects of disease site and stage on the percentages of patients rating these proposed symptoms as moderate to severe. METHODS The severity of 13 symptoms proposed to represent “core” oncology symptoms was rated by 3106 ambulatory patients with cancer of the breast, prostate, colon/rectum, or lung, regardless of disease stage or phase of care; 2801 patients (90%) repeated the assessment 4–5 weeks later. RESULTS At the initial assessment, approximately one third of the patients reported ≥3 symptoms in the moderate-to-severe range; 11 of the 13 symptoms were rated as moderate to severe by at least 10% of all patients and 6 by at least 20% of those in active treatment. Fatigue/tiredness was the most-severe symptom, followed by disturbed sleep, pain, dry mouth, and numbness/tingling. More lung cancer patients and patients in active treatment reported moderate-to-severe symptoms. Percentages of symptomatic patients increased by disease stage, less-adequate response to therapy, and declining performance status. Percentages of patients reporting moderate-to-severe symptoms were stable across both assessments. CONCLUSIONS These results support a core set of moderate-to-severe symptoms common across outpatients with solid tumors that can guide consideration of progression-free survival as a trial outcome and that should be considered in clinical care and in assessments of quality of care and treatment benefit.

BACKGROUND Obesity has been associated with inferior outcomes in operable breast cancer, but the relation between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes by breast cancer subtype has not been previously evaluated. METHODS The authors evaluated the relation between BMI and outcomes in 3 adjuvant trials coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group that included chemotherapy regimens with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, including E1199, E5188, and E3189. Results are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazards models (HR >1 indicates a worse outcome). All P values are 2-sided. RESULTS When evaluated as a continuous variable in trial E1199, increasing BMI within the obese (BMI, ≥30 kg/m2) and overweight (BMI, 25-29.9 kg/m2) ranges was associated with inferior outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER-2)/neu-negative disease for disease-free survival (DFS; P = .0006) and overall survival (OS; P = .0007), but not in HER-2/neu–overexpressing or triple-negative disease. When evaluated as a categorical variable, obesity was associated with inferior DFS (HR, 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.46; P = .0008) and OS (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13-1.67; P = .002) in hormone receptor-positive disease, but not other subtypes. In a model including obesity, disease subtype, and their interaction, the interaction term was significant for OS (P = .02) and showed a strong trend for DFS (P = .07). Similar results were found in 2 other trials (E5188, E3189). CONCLUSIONS In a clinical trial population that excluded patients with significant comorbidities, obesity was associated with inferior outcomes specifically in patients with hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer treated with standard chemohormonal therapy.

Purpose Taxane induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is an important survivorship issue for many cancer patients. Currently, there are no clinically implemented biomarkers to predict which patients might be at increased risk for TIPN. We present a comprehensive approach to identification of genetic variants to predict TIPN. Experimental Design We performed a genome wide association study (GWAS) in 3431 patients from the phase III adjuvant breast cancer trial, ECOG-5103 to compare genotypes with TIPN. We performed candidate validation of top SNPs for TIPN in another phase III adjuvant breast cancer trial, ECOG-1199. Results When evaluating for Grade 3-4 TIPN, 120 SNPs had a p-value <10−4 from patients of European descent (EA) in ECOG-5103. 30 candidate SNPs were subsequently tested in ECOG-1199 and SNP rs3125923 was found to be significantly associated with Grade 3-4 TIPN (p=1.7×10−3; OR=1.8). Race was also a major predictor of TIPN, with patients of African descent (AA) experiencing increased risk of Grade 2-4 TIPN (HR=2.1; p=5.6×10−16) and Grade 3-4 TIPN (HR=2.6; p=1.1×10−11) compared with others. A SNP in FCAMR, rs1856746, had a trend toward an association with Grade 2-4 TIPN in AA patients from the GWAS in ECOG-5103 (OR=5.5; p=1.6×10−7). Conclusion rs3125923 represents a validated SNP to predict Grade 3-4 TIPN. Genetically determined AA race represents the most significant predictor of TIPN.

A B S T R A C T PurposeThe primary objective of this study was to determine whether carboplatin, paclitaxel, and sorafenib (CPS) improve overall survival (OS) compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) in chemotherapynaive patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients and MethodsIn this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III study, all patients received carboplatin at area under the [concentration-time] curve 6 and paclitaxel 225 mg/m 2 intravenously once every 21 days with random assignment to sorafenib 400 mg orally twice per day on days 2 through 19 every 21 days or placebo. The primary end point was OS, and secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective tumor response, and toxicity. ResultsIn all, 823 patients were enrolled over 34 months. At final analysis, the median OS was 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.8 to 12.2 months) for CP and 11.1 months (95% CI, 10.3 to 12.3 months) for CPS; the difference in the OS distribution was not statistically significant by the stratified log-rank test, stratified on American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and prior therapy (P ϭ .878). Median progressionfree survival was 4.9 months for CPS and 4.2 months for CP (P ϭ .092, stratified log-rank test). Response rate was 20% for CPS and 18% for CP (P ϭ .427). More patients on the CPS arm had grade 3 or higher toxicities (84% v 78%; P ϭ .027), with increased rash, hand-foot syndrome, and thrombocytopenia accounting for most of the difference. ConclusionSorafenib does not improve OS when given in combination with CP for chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic melanoma. This study establishes benchmark end points for the CP regimen in first-line therapy of metastatic melanoma.

LBA2 Background: About 6% of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients present with Stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor (IPT). Locoregional treatment (LRT) for the IPT is hypothesized to improve survival based on retrospective analyses, but randomized trials have provided conflicting data. We now report the results of E2108, a Phase 3 trial that examined the worth of LRT for the IPT following initial systemic therapy. Methods: Stage IV patients with IPT were registered, treated with optimal systemic therapy (OST) based on patient and tumor characteristics; those who did not progress during 4-8 months of OST were randomized to LRT for the IPT, or no LRT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with locoregional disease control as a secondary endpoint. Stratified log rank test and Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare OS between treatment groups. Cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence/progression was estimated and Gray test was used for treatment group comparisons. The trial was designed to detect an improvement in 3 year OS rate from 30% with OST alone to 49.3% for OST+LRT (power 95%, 1-sided alpha 0.05) with full information expected after 152 deaths; the data monitoring committee recommended data release after 80% of full information. Results: 390 patients were enrolled between 2/8/11 and 7/23/15, and received OST. Of these, 256 eligible patients were randomized to either continued OST alone (N = 131) or OST+LRT (N = 125).There were 121 deaths and 43 locoregional progression events after a median follow up 59 months (range: 0-91). There was no significant difference in OS (3-year OS rate 68.4% in OST+LRT vs. 67.9% OST alone arm, stratified log-rank p = 0.63, HR = 1.09, 90% CI: 0.80, 1.49) or in progression-free survival (p = 0.40). The locoregional recurrence/progression was significantly higher in the OST alone arm (3-year rate 25.6% vs 10.2%, Gray test p = 0.003). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measured by FACT-B Trial Outcome Index was significantly worse in the OST+LRT arm than OST alone arm at 18 months post randomization (60% completion, Wilcoxon rank sum test p = 0.01), but no difference was observed at time points 6 months (74% completion) or 30 months (56% completion). Conclusions: Early local therapy does not improve survival in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer and an IPT. Although there was a 2.5-fold higher risk of local disease progression without LRT, LRT of the IPT did not lead to improved HRQOL. Clinical trial information: NCT01242800 .

A B S T R A C T PurposeTo determine long-term outcomes in a clinical trial evaluating the role of taxane type and schedule in operable breast cancer and evaluate the impact of obesity and black race on outcome. Patients and MethodsA total of 4,954 eligible women with stage II to III breast cancer treated with four cycles of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel or docetaxel every 3 weeks for four doses or weekly for 12 doses using a 2 ϫ 2 factorial design. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Results are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazards models. All P values are two sided. ResultsWhen compared with the standard every-3-week paclitaxel arm, after a median follow-up of 12.1 years, DFS significantly improved and overall survival (OS) marginally improved only for the weekly paclitaxel (HR, 0.84; P ϭ .011 and HR, 0.87; P ϭ .09, respectively) and every-3-week docetaxel arms (HR, 0.79; P ϭ .001 and HR, 0.86; P ϭ .054, respectively). Weekly paclitaxel improved DFS and OS (HR, 0.69; P ϭ .010 and HR, 0.69; P ϭ .019, respectively) in triple-negative breast cancer. For hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-nonoverexpressing disease, no experimental arm improved OS, and black race and obesity were associated with increased risk of breast cancer recurrence and death. ConclusionImproved outcomes initially observed for weekly paclitaxel were qualitatively similar but quantitatively less pronounced with longer follow-up, although exploratory analysis suggested substantial benefit in triple-negative disease. Further research is required to understand why obesity and race influence clinical outcome in hormone receptor-positive disease.