Background Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) prior to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) affects outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related ARDS, the role of pre-ECMO IMV duration is unclear. This single-centre, retrospective study included critically ill adults treated with ECMO due to severe COVID-19-related ARDS between 01/2020 and 05/2021. The primary objective was to determine whether duration of IMV prior to ECMO cannulation influenced ICU mortality. Results During the study period, 101 patients (mean age 56 [SD ± 10] years; 70 [69%] men; median RESP score 2 [IQR 1–4]) were treated with ECMO for COVID-19. Sixty patients (59%) survived to ICU discharge. Median ICU length of stay was 31 [IQR 20.7–51] days, median ECMO duration was 16.4 [IQR 8.7–27.7] days, and median time from intubation to ECMO start was 7.7 [IQR 3.6–12.5] days. Fifty-three (52%) patients had a pre-ECMO IMV duration of > 7 days. Pre-ECMO IMV duration had no effect on survival (p = 0.95). No significant difference in survival was found when patients with a pre-ECMO IMV duration of < 7 days (< 10 days) were compared to ≥ 7 days (≥ 10 days) (p = 0.59 and p = 1.0). Conclusions The role of prolonged pre-ECMO IMV duration as a contraindication for ECMO in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS should be scrutinised. Evaluation for ECMO should be assessed on an individual and patient-centred basis.

Substantial hyperoxia burden was observed in ICU patients. Young patients with less comorbidities showed hyperoxic episodes more often, especially with lower FiO . Hyperoxia during 7 days of mechanical ventilation did not correlate to increased in-hospital mortality.

BackgroundInvestigating and understanding how students learn on their own is essential to effective teaching, but studies are rarely conducted in this context. A major aim within medical education is to foster procedural knowledge. It is known that case-based questioning exercises drive the learning process, but the way students deal with these exercises is explored little.MethodsThis study examined how medical students deal with case-based questioning by evaluating 426 case-related questions created by 79 fourth-year medical students. The subjects covered by the questions, the level of the questions (equivalent to United States Medical Licensing Examination Steps 1 and 2), and the proportion of positively and negatively formulated questions were examined, as well as the number of right and wrong answer choices, in correlation to the formulation of the question.ResultsThe evaluated case-based questions’ level matched the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 level. The students were more confident with items aiming on diagnosis, did not reject negatively formulated questions and tended to prefer handling with right content, while keeping wrong content to a minimum.ConclusionThese results should be taken into consideration for the formulation of case-based questioning exercises in the future and encourage the development of bedside teaching in order to foster the acquisition of associative and procedural knowledge, especially clinical reasoning and therapy-oriented thinking.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a rapidly progressive lung disease with a high mortality rate. Although lung transplantation (LTx) is a well‐established treatment for a variety of chronic pulmonary diseases, LTx for acute lung failure (due to ARDS) remains controversial. We reviewed posttransplant outcome of ARDS patients from three high‐volume European transplant centers. Demographics and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Viral infection was the main reason for ARDS ( n = 7/13, 53.8%). All patients were admitted to ICU and required mechanical ventilation, 11/13 were supported with ECMO at the time of listing. They were granted a median LAS of 76 (IQR 50–85) and waited for a median of 3 days (IQR 1.5–14). Postoperatively, median length of mechanical ventilation was 33 days (IQR 17–52.5), median length of ICU and hospital stay were 39 days (IQR 19.5–58.5) and 54 days (IQR 43.5–127). Prolongation of peripheral postoperative ECMO was required in 7/13 (53.8%) patients with a median duration of 2 days (IQR 2–7). 30‐day mortality was 7.7%, 1 and 5‐year survival rates were calculated as 71.6% and 54.2%, respectively. Given the lack of alternative treatment options, the herein presented results support the concept of offering live‐saving LTx to carefully selected ARDS patients.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by acute diffuse lung injury, which results in increased pulmonary vascular permeability and loss of aerated lung tissue. This causes bilateral opacity consistent with pulmonary edema, hypoxemia, increased venous admixture, and decreased lung compliance such that patients with ARDS need supportive care in the intensive care unit to maintain oxygenation and prevent adverse outcomes. Recently, advances in understanding the underlying pathophysiology of ARDS led to new approaches in managing these patients. In this review, we want to focus on recent scientific evidence in the field of ARDS research and discuss promising new developments in the treatment of this disease.

Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Mechanical damage to the lungs is potentially aggravated by the activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). This article describes RAS activation profiles in VILI and discusses the effects of angiotensin (Ang) 1-7 supplementation or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition with captopril as protective strategies.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Summary Data on safety and success rates of ultrasound‐guided caudal blockade, performed on sedated children with an uninstrumented airway, are scarce. We performed a retrospective observational study of validated data from April 2014 to December 2020 in a paediatric cohort where the initial plan for anaesthetic management was sedation and caudal epidural without general anaesthesia or airway instrumentation. We examined success rates of this approach and rates of block failure and block‐related complications. In total, 2547 patients ≤ 15 years of chronological age met inclusion criteria. Among the 2547 cases, including 453 (17.8%) former preterm patients, caudal‐plus‐sedation success rate was 95.1%. The primary anaesthesia plan was abandoned for general anaesthesia in 124 cases. Pain‐related block failure in 83 (3.2%) was the most common cause for conversion. Complications included 39 respiratory events and 9 accidental spinal anaesthetics. Higher odds of pain‐related block failure were associated with higher body weight (adjusted OR 1.063, 95%CI 1.035–1.092, p < 0.001) as well as with mid‐abdominal surgery (e.g. umbilical hernia repair) (adjusted OR 15.11, 95%CI 7.69–29.7, p < 0.001), whereas extreme (< 28 weeks) former prematurity, regardless of chronological age, was associated with higher odds (adjusted OR 3.62, 95%CI 1.38–9.5, p = 0.009) for respiratory problems. Ultrasound‐guided caudal epidural, performed under sedation with an uninstrumented airway, is an effective technique in the daily clinical routine. Higher body weight and mid‐abdominal surgical procedures are risk factors for pain‐related block failure. Patients who, regardless of chronological age, had been born as extreme preterm babies are at the highest risk for respiratory events.