Timely detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome due to coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) has been the gold- strategy for identifying positive cases during the current pandemic. However, faster and less expensive methodologies are also applied for the massive diagnosis of COVID-19. In this way, the rapid antigen test (RAT) is widely used. However, it is necessary to evaluate its detection efficiency considering the current pandemic context with the circulation of new viral variants. In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of RAT (SD BIOSENSOR, South Korea), widely used for testing and SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in Santiago of Chile. The RAT showed a 90% (amplification range of 20 ≤ Cq <25) and 10% (amplification range of 25 ≤ Cq <30) of positive SARS-CoV-2 cases identified previously by RT-qPCR. Importantly, a 0% detection was obtained for samples within a Cq value>30. In SARS-CoV-2 variant detection, RAT had a 42.8% detection sensitivity in samples with RT-qPCR amplification range 20 ≤ Cq <25 containing the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) K417N/T, N501Y and E484K, associated with beta or gamma SARS-CoV-2 variants. This study alerts for the special attention that must be paid for the use of RAT at a massive diagnosis level, especially in the current scenario of appearance of several new SARS-CoV-2 variants which could generate false negatives and the compromise of possible viral outbreaks.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many transport kits have been manufactured to preserve and transport nasopharyngeal swab samples (NPSs) from patients. However, there is no information on the performance of the different virus transport media (VTM) used in COVID-19 diagnosis in the population of Santiago de Chile. We compared the RT-qPCR amplification profile of five different viral transport kit mediums, including DNA/RNA Shield™, NAT, VTM-N, Ezmedlab™, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), for NPSs from
Endothelial cells participate in extracellular ATP release elicited by mechanosensors. To characterize the dynamic interactions between mechanical and chemical factors that modulate ATP secretion by the endothelium, we assessed and compared the mechanisms participating in the spontaneous (basal) and mechanically stimulated secretion using primary cultures of rat mesentery endothelial cells. ATP/metabolites were determined in the cell media prior to (basal) and after cell media displacement or a picospritzer buffer puff used as mechanical stimuli. Mechanical stimulation increased extracellular ATP that peaked within 1 min, and decayed to basal values in 10 min. Interruption of the vesicular transport route consistently blocked the spontaneous ATP secretion. Cells maintained in media lacking external Ca elicited a spontaneous rise of extracellular ATP and adenosine, but failed to elicit a further extracellular ATP secretion following mechanical stimulation. 2-APB, a TRPV agonist, increased the spontaneous ATP secretion, but reduced the mechanical stimulation-induced nucleotide release. Pannexin1 or connexin blockers and gadolinium, a Piezo1 blocker, reduced the mechanically induced ATP release without altering spontaneous nucleotide levels. Moreover, thrombin or related agonists increased extracellular ATP secretion elicited by mechanical stimulation, without modifying spontaneous release. In sum, present results allow inferring that the spontaneous, extracellular nucleotide secretion is essentially mediated by ATP containing vesicles, while the mechanically induced secretion occurs essentially by connexin or pannexin1 hemichannel ATP transport, a finding fully supported by results from Panx1 rodents. Only the latter component is modulated by thrombin and related receptor agonists, highlighting a novel endothelium-smooth muscle signaling role of this anticoagulant.
IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic is still in force, causing global public health challenges and threats. Although vaccination and herd immunity have proven to be the most efficient way to control the pandemic, massive and early testing of patients using the RT-qPCR technique is crucial for constant genomic surveillance. The appearance of variants of SARS-CoV-2 with new mutations can reduce the efficiency of diagnostic detection. In this sense, several commercial RT-qPCR kits have been the target of extensive analysis because low assay performance could lead to false-negative diagnoses.MethodsIn this study, we evaluated the performance of three commercial RT-qPCR kits; Thermo Fisher (TaqMan 2019-nCoV Assay Kit v1), BGI and Roche (LightCycler® Multiplex RNA Virus Master) used for the diagnosis of COVID-19 throughout the pandemic in Santiago de Chile.ResultsUnder our best assay conditions, we found significant differences in Cq amplification values for control and viral probes, against the same nasopharyngeal swab samples (NPSs). In addition, in some cases, the sensitivity of the RT-qPCR kits decreased against viral variants.ConclusionOur study suggests evaluating the RT-qPCR kits used to detect SARS-CoV-2 because variants such as Omicron, which has several mutations, can compromise their detection and underestimate viral circulation.
The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a huge challenge and threat to public health throughout the world population. Reverse transcription associated with real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) has been the gold-standard molecular tool for diagnosis and detection of the SARS-CoV-2. Currently, it is used as the main strategy for testing, traceability, and control of positive cases For this reason, the on-top high demand for reagents has produced stock-out on several occasions and the only alternative to keep population diagnosis has been the use of different RT-qPCR kits. Therefore, we evaluate the performance of three of the commercial RT-qPCR kits currently in use for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in Chile, consisting in: TaqMan 2019-nCoV Assay Kit v1 (Thermo). Real-Time Fluorescent RT-PCR Kit for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 (BGI), and LightCycler Multiplex RNA Virus Master (Roche). Results of quantification cycle (Cq) and relative fluorescence units (RFU) obtained from their RT-qPCR reactions revealed important discrepancies on the total RNA required for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 genes and diagnosis. Marked differences between kits in samples with 30>Cq value< 34 was observed. Samples with positive diagnoses for Covid-19 using the Thermo Fisher kit had different results when the same samples were evaluated with Roche and BGI kits. The displacement on the Cq value for SARS-CoV-2 identification between the three different RT-qPCR kits was also evident when the presence of single nucleotide variants was evaluated in the context of genomic surveillance. Taken together, this study emphasizes the special care adjusting RT-qPCR reaction conditions of the different kits must be taken by all the laboratories before carrying out the detection of SARS-CoV-2 genes from total RNA nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples.
Objective: To analyze sociodemographic factors’ influence on COVID-19 case fatality rate (CFR) in Ecuador on a subnational level.Methods: Publicly available register-based observational study. A retrospective cohort of COVID-19 infections between epidemiological weeks 8–53 in the Ecuadorian public healthcare system was determined from available records. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate CFR trends according to factors such as sex, age, location, and healthcare provider.Results: Overall CFR was 9.4%; by canton, median CFR was 5.2%, with some cantons with much higher rates, like Santa Elena (39.1%). Overall CFR decreased during the period, from 16.6% (week 8) to 2.63% (week 53). Being in a rural area was an independent protective factor. Patients over 65 had a hazard ratio of 11.38 (95% CI [11.05, 11.72]). Sex, ethnicity, and treatment from public facilities were also associated with death risk.Conclusion: CFR is a proxy indicator of COVID-19 impact in Ecuador, and this location-based analysis provides new information on the disease’s specific impact subnationally. Overall COVID-19 CFR during the entire period was high, suggesting the need to improve COVID-19 care in Ecuador.
The early detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using the real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as a gold-standard molecular tool has allowed to test and trace the viral spread and the isolation of COVID-19-infected patients. The detection capacity of viral and internal genes is an essential parameter to consider and analyze during the assay. In this study, we analyze the performance of the two commercial RT-qPCR kits used in Chile, TaqMan™ 2019-nCoV Control Kit v1 (Thermo Fisher) and MaxCov19 (TAAG Genetics), for the COVID-19 diagnosis from nasopharyngeal swab samples (NPSs). Our results show a lower sensitivity of the TAAG kit compared to the Thermo Fisher kit, even in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 mutations associated with its variants. This study reinforces the relevance of evaluating the performance of RT-qPCR kits before being used massively since those with lower sensitivity can generate false negatives and produce outbreaks of local infections.
The vesicular nucleotide transporter (VNUT) is critical for sympathetic co-transmission and purinergic transmission maintenance. To examine this proposal, we assessed whether the bisphosphonate clodronate, claimed as a potent in vitro VNUT blocker, modified spontaneous and/or the electrically evoked overflow of ATP/metabolites and NA from mesentery sympathetic perivascular nerve terminals. Additionally, in primary endothelial cell cultures derived from this tissue, we also evaluated whether clodronate interfered with ATP/metabolite cell outflow and metabolism of N6-etheno adenosine 5′-triphosphate (eATP), N6-etheno adenosine (eADO), and adenosine deaminase enzyme activity. Rat mesenteries were perfused in the absence or presence of .01–1,000 nM clodronate, 1–1,000 nM Evans blue (EB), and 1–10 µM DIDS; tissue perfusates were collected to determine ATP/metabolites and NA before, during, and after perivascular electrical nerve terminal depolarization. An amount of 1–1,000 nM clodronate did not modify the time course of ATP or NA overflow elicited by nerve terminal depolarization, and only 10 nM clodronate significantly augmented perfusate adenosine. Electrical nerve terminal stimulation increased tissue perfusion pressure that was significantly reduced only by 10 nM clodronate [90.0 ± 18.6 (n = 8) to 35.0 ± 10.4 (n = 7), p = .0277]. As controls, EB, DIDS, or reserpine treatment reduced the overflow of ATP/metabolites and NA in a concentration-dependent manner elicited by nerve terminal depolarization. Moreover, mechanical stimulation of primary endothelial cell cultures from the rat mesentery added with 10 or 100 nM clodronate increased adenosine in the cell media. eATP was metabolized by endothelial cells to the same extent with and without 1–1,000 nM clodronate, suggesting the bisphosphonate did not interfere with nucleotide ectoenzyme metabolism. In contrast, extracellular eADO remained intact, indicating that this nucleoside is neither metabolized nor transported intracellularly. Furthermore, only 10 nM clodronate inhibited (15.5%) adenosine metabolism to inosine in endothelial cells as well as in a commercial crude adenosine deaminase enzyme preparation (12.7%), and both effects proved the significance (p < .05). Altogether, present data allow inferring that clodronate inhibits adenosine deaminase activity in isolated endothelial cells as in a crude extract preparation, a finding that may account for adenosine accumulation following clodronate mesentery perfusion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.