2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/2594564
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes

Abstract: The early detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using the real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as a gold-standard molecular tool has allowed to test and trace the viral spread and the isolation of COVID-19-infected patients. The detection capacity of viral and internal genes is an essential parameter to consider and analyze during the assay. In this study, we analyze the performance of the two commercial RT-qPCR kits used in Chile, TaqMan™ 2019-nCoV Con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of SARS-CoV-2 was carried out using the ORF1ab gene probe from TaqMan TM 2019nCoV Assay Kit v1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Reference code. A47532) as previously reported by our group (26). We included samples with matching identification numbers to accurately identify RT-qPCR tests from the same patient across different periods.…”
Section: Study Design Sample Collection and Covid-diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of SARS-CoV-2 was carried out using the ORF1ab gene probe from TaqMan TM 2019nCoV Assay Kit v1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Reference code. A47532) as previously reported by our group (26). We included samples with matching identification numbers to accurately identify RT-qPCR tests from the same patient across different periods.…”
Section: Study Design Sample Collection and Covid-diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%