No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The shear strength of elements reinforced by fibres is predicted by Codes using formulations generally developed from a limited set of test results. In fact, only few of available test results are combined with a material mechanical characterization, allowing to evaluate and compare the different performances of Fibre Reinforced Concretes (FRC). To address this problem, a material-performance-based shear database for FRC elements and their related reference samples in Reinforced Concrete (RC, with and without web reinforcement) is presented herein, merging the experiences carried out in the last decade at the University of Brescia and at the Universitat Politècnica de València. The database is composed by 171 specimens: 93 in FRC and 78 in RC with or without web reinforcement. For FRC elements, the postcracking resistance (f R,1 and f R,3 ) is also given according to EN 14651 standard. The evaluation of the shear database was also carried out, discussing the influence of the different factors affecting the shear strength both in FRC and RC samples. Finally, the two formulations suggested by Model Code 2010 for FRC elements are compared against the database results in order to shed new light on code requirements.

This paper reports some recent results of an experimental campaign on fibre reinforced concrete (FRC) beams under shear loading tested at the University of Brescia: nine full scale beams, having a height varying from 500 to 1,500 mm, were tested for investigating the effect of steel fibres on key-parameters influencing the shear response of concrete members, with special emphasis on size effect. All tested members contained no conventional shear reinforcement and different amounts of steel fibres: 0, 0.64 or 1 % by volume. Results show that a relatively low volume fraction of fibres can significantly increase bearing capacity and ductility. The latter determines visible deflection and prior warning of impending collapse, which is not possible in plain concrete beams (without transverse reinforcement). The size effect issue is substantially limited. Results were compared against the shear formulation incorporated in the final draft of fib Model Code, which can be considered a valuable analytical model for FRC beams under shear loading, even in the case of the three deepest elements herein tested

Different tests are proposed by international standards for the evaluation of the mechanical properties of fiber reinforced concrete (FRC); among them, either beams or round determinate panels are generally used. However, different tests are accepted by design codes if reliable correlation factors between standard parameters are provided (fib Model Code 2010). Within this context, a broad experimental program on both beams and round determinate panels was carried out in order to provide a critical discussion on material characterization and to evaluate possible correlation factors. Beam tests according to European (EN 14651), American (ASTM 1609), and Japanese (JCI‐SF4) standard, as well as small round panels and large round panels (according to ASTM 1550) were studied within an experimental program comprising 189 beams and 90 round panels. Unlike previous researches, mainly focused on steel fibers, two types of macro‐synthetic fibers were considered. Based on these experimental results, a comparison between test methods is presented, along with correlation approaches are proposed and critically discussed.

No abstract