The study aimed to investigate the impact of implementing a proposed program for developing critical thinking skills among student teachers at the High Institute for Teachers in Bashir Al Ibrahimi, Algeria. The quantitative, semi-experimental, one-group approach was used, consisting of a pre- and post-test. The developed program was applied to a sample of 37 male and female students from science specializations. The California Critical Thinking Test (2000) version (A) was used after testing its validity and reliability. The results showed that there were statistically significant differences between post and pre-test for some critical thinking skills, namely analysis, induction and deduction, while there were no statistically significant differences between the post and pre-test for inference and evaluation skills. Based on the study findings and Cohen Index (D), the impact of implementing the developed program on developing critical thinking skills was generally weak.
The study aimed to investigate the impact of implementing an improved program for developing creative thinking skills among student-teachers at the Higher Teachers' Institute (Bashir Al Ibrahimi), Algeria. The quantitative, semi-experimental, one-group approach was used, involving a pre-and post-test. The developed program was applied to a sample of 37 male and female students from science classes. The verbal creative thinking test of Torrance Brown, which was translated to Arabic by Khair Allah, was used after confirming its validity and reliability. The results of the (T) test showed that there were statistically significant differences between the post-test and the pre-test of the creative thinking test. The results also indicated that the effect of the developed program in developing creative thinking skills (originality, fluency and flexibility) according to the Cohen indicator (D) exceeded (0.8), which means that the effect was high, as the volume of the effect was (2.51). The study recommended that teaching creative thinking skills should be included as an independent program for student-teachers in higher institutes.
The study aimed to investigate the impact of implementing an improved program for developing creative thinking skills among student-teachers at the Higher Teachers' Institute (Bashir Al Ibrahimi), Algeria. The quantitative, semi-experimental, one-group approach was used, involving a pre-and post-test. The developed program was applied to a sample of 37 male and female students from science classes. The verbal creative thinking test of Torrance Brown, which was translated to Arabic by Khair Allah, was used after confirming its validity and reliability. The results of the (T) test showed that there were statistically significant differences between the post-test and the pre-test of the creative thinking test. The results also indicated that the effect of the developed program in developing creative thinking skills (originality, fluency and flexibility) according to the Cohen indicator (D) exceeded (0.8), which means that the effect was high, as the volume of the effect was (2.51). The study recommended that teaching creative thinking skills should be included as an independent program for student-teachers in higher institutes.
The study aimed to investigate the impact of implementing a proposed program for developing critical thinking skills among student teachers at the High Institute for Teachers in Bashir Al Ibrahimi, Algeria. The quantitative, semi-experimental, one-group approach was used, consisting of a pre- and post-test. The developed program was applied to a sample of 37 male and female students from science specializations. The California Critical Thinking Test (2000) version (A) was used after testing its validity and reliability. The results showed that there were statistically significant differences between post and pre-test for some critical thinking skills, namely analysis, induction and deduction, while there were no statistically significant differences between the post and pre-test for inference and evaluation skills. Based on the study findings and Cohen Index (D), the impact of implementing the developed program on developing critical thinking skills was generally weak.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.