Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) are among the best-motivated dark matter candidates. No conclusive signal, despite an extensive search program that combines, often in a complementary way, direct, indirect, and collider probes, has been detected so far. This situation might change in near future due to the advent of one/multi-TON Direct Detection experiments. We thus, find it timely to provide a review of the WIMP paradigm with focus on a few models which can be probed at best by these facilities. Collider and Indirect Detection, nevertheless, will not be neglected when they represent a complementary probe.
We review how the muon anomalous magnetic moment (g − 2) and the quest for lepton flavor violation are intimately correlated. Indeed the decay µ → eγ is induced by the same amplitude for different choices of in-and outgoing leptons. In this work, we try to address some intriguing questions such as:Which hierarchy in the charged lepton sector one should have in order to reconcile possible signals coming simultaneously from g − 2 and lepton flavor violation?What can we learn if the g − 2 anomaly is confirmed by the upcoming flagship experiments at FERMILAB and J-PARC, and no signal is seen in the decay µ → eγ in the foreseeable future? On the other hand, if the µ → eγ decay is seen in the upcoming years, do we need to necessarily observe a signal also in g − 2?.In this attempt, we generally study the correlation between these observables in a detailed analysis of simplified models. We derive master integrals and
For any realistic halo profile, the Galactic Center is predicted to be the brightest source of gammarays from dark matter annihilations. Due in large part to uncertainties associated with the dark matter distribution and astrophysical backgrounds, however, the most commonly applied constraints on the dark matter annihilation cross section have been derived from other regions, such as dwarf spheroidal galaxies. In this article, we study Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope data from the direction of the inner Galaxy and derive stringent upper limits on the dark matter's annihilation cross section. Even for the very conservative case of a dark matter distribution with a significant (∼kpc) constant-density core, normalized to the minimum density needed to accommodate rotation curve and microlensing measurements, we find that the Galactic Center constraint is approximately as stringent as those derived from dwarf galaxies (which were derived under the assumption of an NFW distribution). For NFW or Einasto profiles (again, normalized to the minimum allowed density), the Galactic Center constraints are typically stronger than those from dwarfs.
In this work we build a gauge model based on the SUð3Þ c SUð3Þ L Uð1Þ N symmetry with heavy neutrinos and show that we can have two weakly interacting cold dark matter candidates in its spectrum. This is achieved by noticing that a global Uð1Þ symmetry can be imposed on the model in such a way that the stability of the dark matter is guaranteed. We obtain their relic abundance and analyze their compatibility with recent direct detection experiments, also exploring the possibility of explaining the two events reported by CDMSII. An interesting outcome of this 3-3-1 model, concerning direct detection of these WIMPs, is a strong bound on the symmetry breaking scale, which imposes it to be above 3 TeV.
We perform a detailed study of the dark Z portal using a generic parametrization of the Z -quarks couplings, both for light (8−15) GeV and heavy (130−1000) GeV dark matter scenarios. We present a comprehensive study of the collider phenomenology including jet clustering, hadronization, and detector artifacts, which allows us to derive accurate bounds from the search for new resonances in dijet events and from mono-jet events in the LHC 7 TeV, LHC 8 TeV, and Tevatron 1.96 TeV data. We also compute the dark matter relic abundance, the relevant scattering cross sections and pair-annihilation spectrum, and compare our results with the current PLANCK, Fermi-LAT and XENON100/LUX bounds. Lastly, we highlight the importance of complementary searches for dark matter, and outline the excluded versus still viable parameter space regions of the dark Z portal.
A deep survey of the Large Magellanic Cloud at ∼ 0.1−100 TeV photon energies with the Cherenkov Telescope Array is planned. We assess the detection prospects based on a model for the emission of the galaxy, comprising the four known TeV emitters, mock populations of sources, and interstellar emission on galactic scales. We also assess the detectability of 30 Doradus and SN 1987A, and the constraints that can be derived on the nature of dark matter. The survey will allow for fine spectral studies of N 157B, N 132D, LMC P3, and 30 Doradus C, and half a dozen other sources should be revealed, mainly pulsar-powered objects. The remnant from SN 1987A could be detected if it produces cosmic-ray nuclei with a flat power-law spectrum at high energies, or with a steeper index 2.3 − 2.4 pending a flux increase by a factor > 3 − 4 over ∼ 2015 − 2035. Large-scale interstellar emission remains mostly out of reach of the survey if its > 10 GeV spectrum has a soft photon index ∼ 2.7, but degree-scale 0.1 − 10 TeV pion-decay emission could be detected if the cosmic-ray spectrum hardens above >100 GeV. The 30 Doradus star-forming region is detectable if acceleration efficiency is on the order of 1 − 10% of the mechanical luminosity and diffusion is suppressed by two orders of magnitude within < 100 pc. Finally, the survey could probe the canonical velocity-averaged cross section for self-annihilation of weakly interacting massive particles for cuspy Navarro-Frenk-White profiles.
We consider the contributions of individual new particles to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, utilizing the generic framework of simplified models. We also present analytic results for all possible one-loop contributions, allowing easy application of these results for more complete models which predict more than one particle capable of correcting the muon magnetic moment. Additionally, we provide a Mathematica code to allow the reader straightforwardly compute any 1-loop contribution. Furthermore, we derive bounds on each new particle considered, assuming either the absence of other significant contributions to a µ or that the anomaly has been resolved by some other mechanism. The simplified models we consider are constructed without the requirement of SU (2) L invariance, but appropriate chiral coupling choices are also considered. In summary, we found the following particles capable of explaining the current discrepancy, assuming unit couplings: 2 TeV (0.3 TeV) neutral scalar with pure scalar (chiral) couplings, 4 TeV doubly charged scalar with pure pseudoscalar coupling, 0.3 − 1 TeV neutral vector boson depending on what couplings are used (vector, axial, or mixed), 0.5−1 TeV singly-charged vector boson depending on which couplings are chosen, and 3 TeV doubly-charged vector-coupled bosons. We also derive the following 1σ lower bounds on new particle masses assuming unit couplings and that the experimental anomaly has been otherwise resolved: a doubly charged pseudo-scalar must be heavier than 7 TeV, a neutral scalar than 3 TeV, a vector-coupled new neutral boson 600 GeV, an axial-coupled neutral boson 1.5 TeV, a singly-charged vector-coupled W 1 TeV, a doubly-charged vector-coupled boson 5 TeV, scalar leptoquarks 10 TeV, and vector leptoquarks 10 TeV. We emphasize that the quoted numbers apply within simplified models, but the reader can easily use our Mathemata code to calculate the contribution of their own model of new physics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.