Introduction: Fractures of modular hip revision stems are not uncommon. The current study examined implant-related factors on stem fracture. We hypothesised that in a modular stem the fracture risk is increased with the use of a short proximal implant component. Materials and methods: Anonymised data of all 32 patients in Switzerland with a Revitan modular hip system who had a stem fracture were obtained from the manufacturer. Implant and patient data were compared with all components implanted in Switzerland during the same time interval. Results: Between 2002 and 2017, 4834 Revitan stems were implanted, of which 32 fractured. A smaller size of the proximal stem component was significantly associated with a higher fracture risk ( p < 0.001). Compared with the control group, the proportion of male patients was higher among the fracture cases, patients were younger, and they had a higher body weight ( p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: The present study suggests that small proximal stem components increase the load at the modular junction due to size and lack of bony support. Surgeons should therefore avoid short proximal components so that the mid-stem junction lies as distally as possible and the risk of fracture is minimised.

The application of an absorbable GDF-5 composite in combination with a core decompression procedure may enhance the healing of devitalized bone defects and is a promising approach for further studies.

We report about a fracture of a modular, uncemented femoral revision stem (Zimmer, Revitan®) due to a not previously described intraoperative technical problem. During implantation, a small ring, part of the proximal part of the trial stem, was left on the distal part of the definite stem. Following this, the top screwcap of the proximal part of the definite stem could not be tightened properly. However, the stem was thought to be stable, and the situation left. Two and a half years later, the proximal part of the stem fractured and the situation became unstable. It is very useful to know about this ring and that it should always be removed, otherwise, there is possibility that it may be left on the definite distal part of the stem with the possibility of a later fracture.