Background There is a lack of information regarding the provision of parental leave for surgical careers. This survey study aims to evaluate the experience of maternity/paternity leave and views on work–life balance globally. Methods A 55-item online survey in 24 languages was distributed via social media as per CHERRIES guideline from February to March 2020. It explored parental leave entitlements, attitude towards leave taking, financial impact, time spent with children and compatibility of parenthood with surgical career. Results Of the 1393 (male : female, 514 : 829) respondents from 65 countries, there were 479 medical students, 349 surgical trainees and 513 consultants. Consultants had less than the recommended duration of maternity leave (43.8 versus 29.1 per cent), no paid maternity (8.3 versus 3.2 per cent) or paternity leave (19.3 versus 11.0 per cent) compared with trainees. Females were less likely to have children than males (36.8 versus 45.6 per cent, P = 0.010) and were more often told surgery is incompatible with parenthood (80.2 versus 59.5 per cent, P < 0.001). Males spent less than 20 per cent of their salary on childcare and fewer than 30 hours/week with their children. More than half (59.2 per cent) of medical students did not believe a surgical career allowed work–life balance. Conclusion Surgeons across the globe had inadequate parental leave. Significant gender disparity was seen in multiple aspects.

No abstract

Aims Incidence of gall stone disease is estimated at 10-15%of population. Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) diagnose choledocholithiasis, delineates the anatomy of the biliary ducts, facilitate the dissection and reduces injuries. Our aim is to assess the feasibility and role of IOC and the incidence of choledocholithiasis in acute cholecystitis (ACC). Methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for patients admitted with ACC and undergoing same-hospital-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). IOC was systematically attempted in all cases. Results 475cases included. Female to male ratio1.9:1. Conversion to open was done in 3 cases. Preoperative cholelithiasis was confirmed in 439cases versus 34cases with no stones. USS CBD abnormality (dilated or contain stone) found in 53 cases, out of which 8(15%) cases had CBD stones. Jaundice was found in 69cases, where 25(39%) cases had confirmed choledocholithiasis. IOC was successful in all cases except one. Abnormal IOC was found in 99(21%) cases. Of those; CBD stones were confirmed in 76 (77%) cases regardless the presence of cholelithisasis on USS. Empyema was found in 237 cases and it was associated with higher risk of abnormal IOC in 59(25%) cases where CBD stones were confirmed in 45(76%) cases. Cystic duct (CD) stones found in 80cases, of those 27(34%)cases had choledocholithiasis. Conclusions Females have double the risk of ACC. Preoperative jaundice and CD stones are stronger indicators than CBD diameter for presence of choledocholithiasis. The incidence of choledocholithiasis in ACC is (20-25%) regardless the presence of gall stones on USS. IOC is feasible and highly recommended in emergency LC.

No abstract

No abstract

Aims Females of child bearing age are at higher risk of negative appendectomy rate, the accepted overall NAR is up to (20-25%). Presented is our study to examine the real NAR in the female’s cohort aged (15-45 years) in the form of quality improvement project to improve patient’s outcome. Methodology Retrospective study in the form of Full audit cycle over 18 months, the first cycle was conducted over 12 months period, followed by the action plan and reassessment over 6 months. Preoperative clinical, laboratory, radiographic and histopathological data were collected. Results Over the whole audit period 632 cases were analysed, 238 cases were females in the child bearing age included in our cohort. Over the first phase 419 appendectomy cases were performed, among those 156(37%) were females in child bearing age. Overall NAR was 29% and in our females cohort was 43.5%. Over the second cycle, 213 cases performed, out of which 82(38%) cases included in our cohort. Overall NAR reduced to 25% and in our cohort was 37% Conclusions Despite the advances in diagnostic modalities, Females are at significantly higher risk of NAR 37%. Our overall NAR reduced from 29% to 25% compared to the young females cohort, the rate dropped from 43% to 37%. specific consideration and regular auditing of results regards this cohort are highly recommended. Validation of appendicitis scores for risk stratification, Serial examinations and radiological adjuncts are possible solutions to reduce the NAR among this group.

Midline laparotomy is still performed in high proportion of patients during elective and emergency procedures. Effective analgesia is essential for enhanced recovery programs especially with the focus of multi-modal opioid sparing analgesia with its benefits in reducing opiate related side effects. Many centres adopted the use of rectal sheath catheters (RSC) in all patients undergoing laparotomy, yet its use not been standardised as there is no hard evidence supporting its use. We aim from this systematic review to explore the effectiveness of RSC in post laparotomy analgesia and to compare between different techniques of insertion. We performed a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA standards. Search of electronic information data base (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Library, Dynamed). Results (45) studies reviewed. (33) included with (1326) patients. Conclusion There is lack of high level evidence investigating RSC rule in post laparotomy analgesia, nonetheless which is the most effective technique (USS vs surgically inserted), in spite of large heterogeneity in methodology and scarcity of trials; the consensus of the reviewed studies concluded that it decreases opiates requirements by at least (70%) in patients receiving PCA and as good as ED but with less side effects.

Aims Appendicitis remains the most common acute surgical condition.  No standard guidelines for the use of imaging studies, and there is a discrepancy between the published data regarding accuracy of these modalities and our practical findings. Yet the growing number of USS reported as “appendix not visualized” has led us to rethink about the value of USS in acute appendicitis.  Methods A retrospective single centre study for all females (15-45 years) underwent emergency appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis. Analysis of preoperative clinical, radiographic and postoperative histopathological data was done. Results 632 cases analysed over 18months, out of those 238 (37%) were females (15-45 years). USS was done in 129(54%) cases. 25(10.5) cases had both USS and CTAP. 32(13%) cases had only CTAP. The mean rate of appendix visualization in the USS was 30%(71cases) two thirds reported by radiologist versus one third by sonographers. Our negative appendectomy rate dropped from 25 to 15% after a positive scan.  Conclusions Traditional preference for ultrasound in the UK compared to CTAP in young population is mostly due to the potential hazards of irradiation, but USS commonly does not visualise the appendix in our practice (70%), and has low sensitivity and specificity for appendicitis.  However, following a positive USS, NAR dropped to 15%. Radiologists had a higher visualization rate of appendix compared to sonographers. Commitment to improve the performance of ultrasonography by allocating adequately timed sessions to the most experienced radiologists and increasing the use of low dose CT scans are possible solutions.