Summary
Background
Cognitive decline is a debilitating manifestation of disease progression in Parkinson’s disease. We aimed to develop a clinical-genetic score to predict global cognitive impairment in patients with the disease.
Methods
A prediction algorithm for global cognitive impairment (defined as Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) ≤25) was built using data from 1,350 patients with 5,165 longitudinal visits over 12.8 (median, 2.8) years. Age at onset, MMSE, education, motor exam score, gender, depression and GBA mutations, machine selected through stepwise Cox’ hazards analysis and Akaike’s information criterion, were used to compute the multivariable predictor. Independent validation was achieved in another 1,132 patients with 19,127 visits over 8.6 (median, 6.5) years.
Findings
The cognitive risk score accurately predicted cognitive impairment within ten years of disease onset with an area under the curve (AUC) of >0.85 in both the discovery (95% CI, 0.821–0.902) and validation populations (95% CI, 0.779 – 0.913). 72.6% of patients scoring in the highest quartile were cognitively impaired by ten years vs. 3.7% in the lowest quartile (hazard ratio, 18.4, 95% CI, 9.4 – 36.1). Dementia or disabling cognitive impairment was predicted with an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI 0.788–0.943) and high negative predictive value (0.920, 95% 0.877–0.954) at the predefined cutoff (0.196). Performance was stable in 10,000 randomly resampled subsets.
Interpretation
Our predictive algorithm provides a potential test for future cognitive health or impairment in patients with Parkinson’s. It could improve trials of cognitive interventions and inform on prognosis.
Background: Patients suffering from Parkinson's disease (PD) describe painful sensations that could be related to neuropathic pain. Experimental data have indicated the involvement of basal ganglia and dopaminergic pathways in central nociceptive processing. Aim: The objective of this study was to assess and compare the effect of levodopa on the objective pain threshold in patients with PD and healthy subjects. Methods: The objective pain threshold was assessed by the nociceptive flexion reflex (RIII) in 13 PD patients and 10 healthy subjects. Patients and healthy subjects were evaluated under two randomised conditions: with levodopa (ON) and without (OFF). Results: Levodopa significantly increased the RIII threshold of PD patients (6.9 (1.2) mA in the OFF condition vs 8 (1.1) mA in the ON position; p = 0.02). RIII threshold was significantly lower in PD patients than in healthy subjects in the OFF condition (6.9 (1.2) mA vs 9.7 (3.4) mA; p = 0.02). RIII threshold did not change after levodopa administration in healthy subjects. Conclusion: These results provide evidence of a dopaminergic modulation of objective pain threshold in PD patients. In addition, the decrease in RIII threshold in PD patients, in the OFF condition, compared with controls, confirms the existence of an objective pain perception disturbance in PD.
We sought to define the influence of ageing in clinical, cognitive, and quality-of-life outcomes after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD). We performed motor assessment (UPDRS), mood tests, cognitive, and quality of life evaluation (PDQ-39) on PD patients before surgery, and 12 and 24 months after, and we recorded adverse events. The variations of these parameters after surgery were correlated with age using regression statistical tests. Cerebral bleeding risk was evaluated by a nonparametric test. We enrolled 45 patients (mean age 60 +/- 9 years, range 40-73). No significant correlation was found between age and motor scores and PDQ-39 improvements at 12 months. At 24 months, there was a significant negative correlation between age and the improvement of three dimensions of PDQ 39 (mobility, activities of daily life, and cognition). Cognitive impairment showed no correlation, but apathy and depression were positively correlated with age. Significant statistical difference was observed between cerebral bleeding and age. STN-DBS is an effective treatment for elderly patients with advanced PD. A longer follow-up duration and a larger population seem necessary to better assess the quality of life perception in elderly patients and to determinate the real risk of hemorrage.
The "Ardouin Scale of Behavior in Parkinson's Disease" is a new instrument specifically designed for assessing mood and behavior with a view to quantifying changes related to Parkinson's disease, to dopaminergic medication, and to non-motor fluctuations. This study was aimed at analyzing the psychometric attributes of this scale in patients with Parkinson's disease without dementia. In addition to this scale, the following measures were applied: the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Lille Apathy Rating Scale, the Bech and Rafaelsen Mania Scale, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the MacElroy Criteria, the Patrick Carnes criteria, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Patients (n=260) were recruited at 13 centers across four countries (France, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States). Cronbach's alpha coefficient for domains ranged from 0.69 to 0.78. Regarding test-retest reliability, the kappa coefficient for items was higher than 0.4. For inter-rater reliability, the kappa values were 0.29 to 0.81. Furthermore, most of the items from the Ardouin Scale of Behavior in Parkinson's Disease correlated with the corresponding items of the other scales, depressed mood with the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (ρ=0.82); anxiety with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety (ρ=0.56); apathy with the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (ρ=0.60). The Ardouin Scale of Behavior in Parkinson's disease is an acceptable, reproducible, valid, and precise assessment for evaluating changes in behavior in patients with Parkinson's disease without dementia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.