Purpose In skeletally immature patients, treatment of malalignment about the knee is possible by performing temporary hemi-epiphyseodesis. Following the well-established procedure of physeal stapling, the 8-plate was introduced as a new device. The purpose of this study was to compare physeal stapling with 8-plate hemi-epiphyseodesis. We focused on evaluating deformity correction, complication rate and duration of the procedures. Methods We retrospectively analysed 35 patients (61 extremities, age 2.9-16.0 years) who were treated by temporary hemi-epiphyseodesis about the knee for correction of genu varum or genu valgum by using Blount staples (32 extremities) or the 8-plate (29 extremities). Plain radiographs were analysed at the time of operation and at hardware removal that included measurement of mechanical axis deviation, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle. Time until hardware removal, operation time and complications were recorded. Results A statistically significant improvement of all radiographic measurements could be achieved with comparable results in both groups. Complications were similar in both groups with no relevant differences in amount and severity. In the 8-plate group, however, the surgical time was significantly shorter by an average of ten minutes for implantation and 12 minutes for explantation.Conclusions Both Blount stapling and the 8-plate technique are methods for correction of genu varum and valgum deformity in skeletally immature patients; however, a shorter operating time for implantation and explantation was noted for the 8-plate technique.

Sagittal plane hip function is significantly impaired in florid and advanced LCPD. The results of this study will lead to further investigations into whether this development can be prevented by conservative or operative treatment thus improving function and long-term prognosis.

Morbus Perthes today still poses a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon because of the unclear aetiology as well as the controversial discussion about the role and kind of multiple treatment principles. The prognosis depends upon clinical (e.g. age at onset, reduction of range of motion, gender) and radiological (extent of necrosis, containment) parameters. Of these, only the reduced range of motion and a loss of containment can be adressed therapeutically, be it in a conservative and/or operative concept. Pelvic osteotomies have the advantage of a high potential of correction without the biomechanic disadvantages which are associated with intertrochanteric varus osteotomies. Nowadays, the use of orthoses is considered to be obsolete. Non-containment is targeted mainly on the symptomatic treatment and the correction of residual deformities. Based on the outcome after the final stage there is a risk of premature osteoarthritis with the need of early total hip replacement.

No abstract