Since the time when the human race first began to speculate about the origin of the universe there have been two cosmological models that have seemed particularly attractive to its imagination. One has been to derive everything in the world from a single primal origin, out of which the cosmos, in all its apparent complexity, evolves. The other has been to view the history of the universe as a battle between two opposing forces which contradict and undermine each other. The two views can be called monism and dualism. They are not the only possibilities. There have been systems that posit three, four or an indefinite number of principles, but most of these have also tended to assume one basic pair of opposites with one or more neutral or intermediate principles beside them; this too can be seen as a form of dualism.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. British Institute of Persian Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Iran.The calendar of the Iranians before Islam has been the subject of an extremely large mass of literature, in the West beginning in the Age of Enlightenment with works by Scaliger and Hyde and extending down to a recent contribution by Boris Marshak in the pages of thisjournal.' To review all of these studies would be a futile undertaking; if one is to write at all on such a well-exercised subject one might as well say something new rather than repeating and criticising what has been said before. In the following we shall consequently limit ourselves to a re-examination of the primary sources in oriental languages and restrict citations of secondary literature almost entirely to basic philological matters.The present study concerns only the Persian calendar and its close relatives in Sogdiana, Choresmia and Armenia. The most ancient forms of time-keeping in Iran, namely the early Avestan, Elamite and Old-Persian luni-solar calendars, are the subject of a separate study, which we hope to publish in the very near future. Readers might find it convenient, on first perusal of these pages, to concentrate on the first, fourth and fifth sections, and to skim over the others, as these are not central to the argument. Beru-ni's description of the Persian calendarThe most comprehensive account that we possess of Iranian calendars is that given by the famous Muslim scientist 3Ab i Rayhan al-Bayrfini (in Persian: Berini)2 is his early work al-'M•iru 1-bdqiya Cani 1-quru-ni 1-xdliya3 which he wrote about the year 1000, and which is complimented in a few important points by two of his later works, Kitabu t-tafhim ii 'awd~ili sindcati t-tanjim4 and al-Qdnuinu 1-mascfidi5 the latter written in 1030. His description specifically of the Persian calendar (as opposed to the Sogdian and Choresmian varieties of Iranian chronology) has two rather different components: on the one hand an empirical description of the workings of the calendar which was actually used by the Persian Zoroastrians of his own day, and on the other a reconstruction of the pre-history of that calendar, under the Sasanians and earlier, and an aetiological explanation for the peculiarities of its workings. The main argument of the present paper is that while Berfini's empirical description both of the Persian, and of the other Iranian calendars, is unquestionably correct, his account of its history is a legend.The acceptance of this legend, in one form or another, by the majority of modern scholars6 is the main cause of the confusion which has enshrouded the history of Iranian time-keeping before Islam.The empirical facts...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.