Viral hepatitis is a major public health problem affecting millions of people worldwide. Long-term consequences are the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of the study was to assess outcomes and costs of treating patients with chronic hepatitis C in clinical practice in Germany. We carried out a prospective noninterventional study. Information on treatment outcomes, resource utilization and quality of life was provided by 281 physicians throughout Germany. Data of 3708 monoinfected HCV-patients treated between 2008 and 2011 were analysed. Therapy consisted of peginterferon/ribavirin. Mean age of patients was 43.7 years, 60.3% were male and estimated duration of infection was 13.6 years. Predominantly genotype 1 (61.3%) or 3 (28.5%) infections were observed. Sustained viral response (SVR)-rates in most frequently observed genotypes were 49.2% in GT-1 and 61.9% in GT-3 treatment-naive patients (Relapser: GT-1: 35.3% and GT-3: 57.3%; Nonresponder: GT-1: 25.0% and GT-3: 33.3%). Average treatment costs were lowest in treatment-naive patients (€18 965) and higher in patients who failed previous treatments (relapsers: €24 753; nonresponders: €19 511). Differences according to genotype were observed. Average costs per SVR in treatment-naive patients were €44 744 for GT-1 and €22 218 for GT-3. Treatment was associated with a decrease in quality of life; post-treatment quality of life was higher in patients achieving SVR. Our insight on real-life treatment outcomes and costs can serve as a reference for a comparison with other treatments. There is high need for short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness analysis in real-life settings as newly introduced treatment strategies with direct acting antivirals result in high SVR-rates but are more costly.

The results show that in multicultural areas, the prevalence of chronic viral hepatitis is increased. Because of the potential of progressive liver damage in viral hepatitis, field screening in specific populations at high risk for hepatitis should be performed.

1. ObjectiveChronic hepatitis C virus infections (HCV) cause a significant public health burden. Introduction of telaprevir (TVR) and boceprevir (BOC) has increased sustained virologic response rates (SVR) in genotype 1 patients but were accompanied by higher treatment costs and more side effects. Aim of the study was to assess outcomes and costs of treating HCV with TVR or BOC in routine care.2. Material and MethodsData was obtained from a non-interventional study. This analysis relates on a subset of 1,786 patients for whom resource utilisation was documented. Sociodemografic and clinical parameters as well as resource utilisation were collected using a web-based data recording system. Costs were calculated using official remuneration schemes.3. ResultsMean age of patients was 49.2 years, 58.6% were male. In treatment-naive patients SVR-rates of 62.2% and 55.7% for TVR and BOC were observed (prior relapser: 68.5% for TVR and 63.5% for BOC; prior non-responder: 45.6% for TVR and 39.1% for BOC). Treatment costs are dominated by costs for pharmaceuticals and range between €39,081 and €53,491. We calculated average costs per SVR of €81,347 (TVR) and €70,163 (BOC) in treatment-naive patients (prior relapser: 78,089 €/SVR for TVR and 82,077 €/SVR for BOC; prior non-responder: 116,509 €/SVR for TVR and 110,156 €/SVR for BOC). Quality of life data showed a considerable decrease during treatment.4. ConclusionOur study is one of few investigating both, outcomes and costs, of treating HCV in a real-life setting. Data can serve as a reference in the discussion of increasing costs in recently introduced agents.

length of stay (LOS) and costs. Results were projected to the national level. Generalized linear models were used for the analysis. Covariates included the baseline patient-level surgical risk factors and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: SSI incidence was highest among colon surgery [12.0%, 95%CI:11.78-12.2%0)] and CABG [6.1%; 95%CI:5.88-6.2%)] cases, and lowest among C-section [0.3%; 95%CI:0.28-0.31%)] and vaginal hysterectomy [0.16%; 95%CI:0.13-0.2%)] cases. The projected national rates captured by Premier database were similar to the rates reported by the National Health Safety Network reported rates. Among all surgical procedures, health resource use associated with CABG and colon surgery cases were most affected by SSI. SSI resulted on an average

Treatment of HCV patients involves high costs, mainly associated with the length of antiviral therapy. Viral eradication can prevent severe disease stages, which are associated with high costs. It is necessary to follow current guidelines and monitor patients closely to avoid unnecessary costs.

The treatment of chronic hepatitis C has considerably changed with the introduction of recent direct acting antivirals. These antivirals have sustained virologic response (SVR) rates above 90 % as well as reduced toxicity and treatment duration. Therefore, current German guidelines recommend these interferon-free regimens as first-choice treatment. Nevertheless, recent developments were accompanied by a significant increase in treatment costs, which led to extensive discussions on reasonable pharmaceutical prices. The aim of the current study was to analyze the average treatment costs and costs per patient cured for guideline treatment recommendations. Analyses were stratified according to genotype, treatment status (naive/experienced), and presence/absence of cirrhosis. Costs were separated in (1.) basic diagnostic procedures, (2.) monitoring, and (3.) pharmaceuticals. The calculation is based on a remuneration scheme in the statutory health insurance system. In treatment-naïve non-cirrhotic patients, the average cost is 41 766 €/SVR for the treatment with SOF/LDV calculated (PTV/r/OMV+DSV: 53 129 €/SVR). In treatment-naive cirrhotic patients, costs were 60 323 €/SVR (SOF/LDV+RBV) and 80 604 €/SVR (PTV/r/OMV+DSV+RBV). Treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients had average costs of 60 366 €/SVR for SOF/LDV treatment as well as 53 134 €/SVR for PTV/r/OMV+DSV±RBV treatment (cirrhotic patients: 62 208 €/SVR for SOF/LDV+RBV; 80 824 €/SVR for PTV/r/OMV+DSV+RBV). The average treatment costs per SVR in treatment-naive genotype 1 patients are comparable to previous standard of care treatments and lower in treatment-experienced patients. In other genotypes, treatment costs and costs per cure are significantly higher compared to previous standard of care. However, long-term modelling studies show that new regimens are cost-effective.

Early discovery of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis is becoming more relevant because of enhanced incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. There a many underlying factors in developing liver fibrosis (i.e. viral hepatitis, steatohepatitis). Diagnosis of liver fibrosis is difficult; chronic liver failure and less distinct fibrosis stages can be underestimated, when laboratory routine parameters and native ultrasound of the liver are unsuspicious. Liver biopsy is a common element of diagnostic workup in hepatic cirrhosis, alongside clinical examination and abdominal ultrasound, and is the accepted diagnostic gold standard. But there is no unitary system of histological classification used to evaluate the degree of fibrosis, and individual systems are often validated only for individual disease entities. On the other hand liver biopsy is of less tolerance for patients. In the last years serological markers for detecting liver fibrosis were developed with different validity. Various imaging modalities have been proposed as methods for assessing liver fibrosis by liver stiffness measurement. They are sufficient to approve the suspicious of liver fibrosis and/or to uncover unknown chronic liver failure. Studies showed the clinical usefulness of acoustic radiation force impulse shear wave elasticity imaging (ARFI-SWEI) is efficient as a preventive screening method to uncover fibrosis. The ARFI-SWEI system is integrated in an ultrasound device has a good accuracy and high reproducibility. Therapy of liver fibrosis depends on underlying disease and degree of liver failure. When liver failure can be cured liver fibrosis can regress. Direct antifibrotic drugs are actually not available but in progress.

BackgroundEarly discovery of liver fibrosis is becoming more popular because of enhanced incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ultrasound-based liver elastography is a method used to approve suspected liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. We assessed the clinical usefulness of acoustic radiation force impulse shear wave elasticity imaging (ARFI-SWEI) as a preventive screening method to uncover fibrosis.MethodsWe screened 382 patients by native routine sonography for abnormal liver results and divided them into six groups: group 1: normal liver, groups 2-4: fatty liver grade I-III, group 5: liver cirrhosis, and group 6: inhomogenic liver tissue. Then ARFI-SWEI was performed and the results were compared with published shear wave velocity cut-off values that were predictive of each fibrosis stage (F0-4). A control group consisted of 20 healthy volunteers.ResultsThe part of liver fibrosis ≥ F2 was in groups 1-4: 20-32%, group 5: 100%, and group 6: 91%. Main causes for fibrosis stage ≥ F2 were (non)-alcoholic steatohepatitis, chronic viral or autoimmune hepatitis and chronic heart failure.ConclusionsScreening of the liver tissue in b-mode ultrasound can underestimate possible liver fibrosis; by using ARFI-SWEI, liver fibrosis can be uncovered early. It is a suitable preventive method comparable to colonoscopy for colon cancer.