Abstract:In comparison with established democracies Nigeria is a highly populated and ethnic fragmented state. Therefore after colonial rule and independence a federal constitutional structure was supposed to bring the processes for conflict resolution between the ethnic groups.
This article critically appraises the political, social, and economic processes of privatization in Nigeria since 1999. A qualitative analysis of the privatization process and outcomes is carried out within the broader state versus market debate in political economy of reforms. It will be revealed that privatization has not produced its purported outcomes of efficiency/consumer satisfaction and social equity, and the privatization process has not been thoroughly transparent and accountable. In explaining the outcomes and process, the article highlights the problems posed for reforms by the weak democratic infrastructure and institutional framework for regulation; the logic of neoliberal ideology, which constrains the space of action for developing countries or forces these countries to act along specific trajectories instead of others in order to be seen as embracing globalization; and above all, the political constraints relating to the opportunistic and self-interested attitude of political and economic elites who are determined to continue to benefit from privatization as they did during the pre-reform era of public enterprises.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.