Niniejszy artykuł analizuje konstrukcje, w których uwydatniona jest informacja dana. W pierwszej części artykułu dokonujemy klasyfikacji topików znajdujących się w analizowanych konstrukcjach. Ponieważ proces topikalizacji kojarzony jest zazwyczaj z przesunięciem w strukturze, wybrane testy pokazują czy rzeczywiście wszystkie badane konstrukcje wykazują cechy przesunięcia. Jak się okazuje, konstrukcje z topikiem kontrastywnym potrzebują analizy, która pogodzi ze sobą cechy przesunięcia do pozycji argumentu oraz do pozycji innej niż pozycja argumentu. Przedstawione dowody świadczą o tym, iż ruch dopełnienia w konstrukcjach o szyku dopełnienie-to-podmiot-orzeczenie jest ruchem niekwantyfikującym i wieloetapowym: najpierw do pozycji nad podmiotem aczkolwiek wykazującej cechy podmiotu, a następnie do pozycji okupowanej przez topiki. ABSTRACT In this paper we show that there are different topic dislocations in Polish, each representing a specific type of a discourse function. With a battery of diagnostic tests we analyse each dislocation and propose their classification. As it turns out, constructions implementing a contrastive topic exhibit features of both A and A’-movement, which turns out problematic for a uniform analysis. We demonstrate that the movement in them is non-quantificational. The movement targeting TopP consists of at least two steps. An object undergoes A-movement and lands in the specifier of an Aboutness Phrase. Then it moves to SpecTopP where it checks a discourse feature.
A b s t r a c t. In this paper the Author describes a group of frequency adjectives in Polish. Polish frequency adjectives may be divided with regard to different readings, namely an adverbial reading, an internal reading and a generic reading as well as a type of a modified noun. The three readings were analysed in English, e.g. by Stump (1981) and Gehrke and McNally (2013). The adverbial reading occurs with frequency adjectives modifying event nouns. In contrast to English, Polish frequency adjectives inducing an adverbial reading admit all sorts of determiners and allow coordination with a specific group of adjectives. Frequency adjectives giving rise to an internal reading require a participant noun. The group of frequency adjectives compatible with a generic reading turns out to be the most varied one.
A b s t r a c t. The aim of this paper is to identify the syntactic position of the comparative operator tak. First, we present a classification of degree phrases as proposed by Neeleman, van de Koot and Doetjes (2004). The authors divide degree expressions into two classes, namely class-1 and class-2 degree expressions. The expressions of the first class function as heads while expressions of the second class form a group of maximal projections. Only the former but not the latter c-select prepositional phrases, nominal phrases with a gradient property and verbal phrases. Since class-2 degree expressions are adjuncts, they can have a rich internal structure and appear without the host element. As for the movement, only class-2 degree expressions can undergo leftward movement. In the paper we demonstrate that comparative tak looks like a class-2 degree expression in contrast to its English counterpart in an analogical construction, i.e. the comparative as. The crucial difference between English and Polish degree expressions is the fact that in English the dummy operator much appears only in a limited number of contexts while its Polish equivalent, i.e. bardzo, is very common among degree expressions from class-1. This observation does not allow us to adopt Neeleman et al. (2004) syntactic analysis of degree expressions without any modifications.
The paper constitutes a review of a collection of articles entitled ‘Various Dimensions of Contrastive Studies’ published by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego in 2016 under the editorship of Bożena Cetnarowska, Marcin Kuczok and Marcin Zabawa. Each section of the review contains a critical evaluation of one paper found in the volume. We conclude that although the volume could benefit from more direct discussion pertaining to the methodology of contrastive studies, each of the articles constitutes a significant contribution to its particular domain and is worth-recommending to the reader who desires to keep track of the developments within different areas of the study of language.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.