This study aims to analyze the performance of Islamic banking in Southeast Asian countries using maqashid shariah index. The performance assessment of Islamic banking is usually only seen from the measurement of financial performance. In this study, the performance of Islamic banking will be measured in terms of the purpose of using the concept maqashid shariah index advanced by Abdul Majid Najjar which presents a concept maqashid shariah more widely and effectively by divide it into four objectives and eight elements. This type of research is quantitative descriptive. The object of the research is an Islamic commercial bank in the Southeast Asian countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, Thailand and the Philippines) which have 25 Islamic banks. Data used is secondary data in the form of financial statements or annual reports that obtained from the official website of each bank. By using maqashid shariah index and the methods of SAW (Simple Additive Weighting), it can be concluded that Indonesia has the best performance in the amount of 46.22%, followed by Malaysia amounted to 43.15%, Brunei Darussalam by 37.54%, Thailand amounted to 17.51%, and Philippine amounted to 1.12%.
The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the effect of Musharaka financing risk and the risk of murabaha financing to profitability in Indonesian Islamic banks. The target population of this research is Islamic Banks in Indonesia that registered for three consecutive years. Based entire population, there are 11 Islamic bank for 3 years with 33 observation data. The multiple regression analysis model in used to test the hypothesis. The results of this study indicate that the risk of Musharaka financing and murabahah risks simultaneously affect on profitability. In partial Musharaka financing risk and the risk of murabaha financing have positive influances on profitability.
This research aims to examine the impact of Intellectual Capital and Good Governance Business Syariah (GGBS) towards Islamicity Financial Performance Index proxied by Profit Sharing Ratio (PSR). The data used is secondary data obtained from annual reports and the GCG implementation report that was published by the Islamic banks in the period of 2012 to 2016. This is a hypothesis testing research using purposive sampling method with 11 Islamic banks as the object of the research. The analysis method used is multiple regression analysis and the result partially shows that GGBS has a significant influence on Islamicity financial performance index, whereas intellectual capital does not.While, simultaneous testing shows both variables affect the islamicity financial performance index Islamic bank. Keywords: intellectual capital, GGBS, profit sharing ratio, Islamicity financial performance index Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh Modal Intelektual dan penerapan Good Governance Business Syariah terhadap Islamicity Financial Performance Index yang diproksikan dengan Profit Sharing Ratio (PSR). Data yang digunakan merupakan data sekunder yang berasal dari laporan tahunan (annual report) dan laporan pelaksanaan GCG yang dipublikasikan pada website masing-masing Bank syariah selama periode 2012-2016. Penelitian hipotesis ini menggunakan purposive sampling sebagai pengambilan sampel dengan 11 Bank Umum Syariah sebagai objek penelitian. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi linear berganda, dan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara parsial modal intelektual tidak berpengaruh terhadap Islamicity Financial Performance Index perbankan syariah, sedangkan penerapan Good Governance Business syariah berpengaruh signifikan terhadap Islamicity Financial Performance Index. Pengujian secara simultan menunjukkan bahwa kedua variabel berpengaruh signifikan terhadap Islamicity Financial Performance Index Perbankan Syariah.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.