The potential efficacy of drugs delivered by CED may be severely constrained by ineffective delivery in many patients. Routine use of software algorithms and alternative catheter designs and infusion parameters may improve the efficacy of drugs delivered by CED.

The PRECISE study used convection enhanced delivery (CED) to infuse IL13-PE38QQR in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and compared survival to Gliadel Wafers (GW). The objectives of this retrospective evaluation were to assess: (1) catheter positioning in relation to imaging features and (2) to examine the potential impact of catheter positioning, overall catheter placement and imaging features on long term clinical outcome in the PRECISE study. Catheter positioning and overall catheter placement were scored and used as a surrogate of adequate placement. Imaging studies obtained on day 43 and day 71 after resection were each retrospectively reviewed. Catheter positioning scores, catheter overall placement scores, local tumor control and imaging change scores were reviewed and correlated using Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Cox PH regression analysis was used to examine whether these imaging based variables predicted overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) after adjusting for age and KPS. Of 180 patients in the CED group, 20 patients did not undergo gross total resection. Of the remaining 160 patients only 53% of patients had fully conforming catheters in respect to overall placement and 51% had adequate catheter positioning scores. Better catheter positioning scores were not correlated with local tumor control (P = 0.61) or imaging change score (P = 0.86). OS and PFS were not correlated with catheter positioning score (OS: P = 0.53; PFS: P = 0.72 respectively), overall placement score (OS: P = 0.55; PFS: P = 0.35) or imaging changes on day 43 MRI (P = 0.88). Catheter positioning scores and overall catheter placement scores were not associated with clinical outcome in this large prospective trial.

Background Treatment options for patients suffering brainstem gliomas are quite limited as surgery is not an option against intrinsic tumors at brainstem and chemotherapy generally failed to demonstrate its efficacy. Intracerebral convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a novel approach for administering chemotherapy to patients with brain tumors. We present the results of phase I trial of CED of nimustine hydrochloride (ACNU), designed to determine the maximum tolerable concentration of ACNU, for patients with recurrent brainstem gliomas. Methods Sixteen patients, aged 3–81 years old, suffering from recurrent brainstem gliomas, including diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma patients as well as patients with recurrent gliomas that originated from non-brainstem sites, were enrolled in this trial between February 2011 and April 2016. The dose/concentration escalation trial included 3 dose/concentration groups (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 mg/mL, all at 7 mL) to determine the safety and tolerability of CED of ACNU. Real-time monitoring of drug distribution was performed by mixing gadolinium-tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid (Gd-DOTA) in the infusion solution. CED of ACNU was given in combination with oral or intravenous temozolomide chemotherapy. Results CED of ACNU demonstrated antitumor activity, as assessed by radiographic changes and prolonged overall survival. The recommended dosage was 0.75 mg/mL. Drug-associated toxicity was minimal. Conclusions Intracerebral CED of ACNU under real-time monitoring of drug distribution, in combination with systemic temozolomide, was well tolerated among patients with recurrent brainstem gliomas. The safety and efficacy observed suggest the clinical benefits of this strategy against this devastating disease. Based on this phase I study, further clinical development of ACNU is warranted.

No abstract

OBJECTIVEConvection-enhanced delivery (CED) has been explored as a therapeutic strategy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). Variables that may affect tolerance include infusate volume, infusion rate, catheter trajectory, and target position. Supratentorial approaches for catheter placement and infusate distribution patterns may conflict with corticospinal tracts (CSTs). The clinical relevance of these anatomical constraints has not been described. The authors report their experience using CED in the brainstem as it relates to anatomical CST conflict and association with clinical tolerance.METHODSIn a phase I clinical trial of CED for DIPG (clinical trial registration no. NCT01502917, clinicaltrials.gov), a flexible infusion catheter was placed with MRI guidance for infusion of 124I-8H9, a radioimmunotherapeutic agent. Intra- and postprocedural MR images were analyzed to identify catheter trajectories and changes in T2-weighted signal intensity to approximate volume of distribution (Vd). Intersection of CST by the catheter and overlap between Vd and CST were recorded and their correlation with motor deficits was evaluated.RESULTSThirty-one patients with a mean age of 7.6 years (range 3.2–18 years) underwent 39 catheter insertions for CED between 2012 and 2017. Thirty catheter insertions had tractography data available for analysis. The mean trajectory length was 105.5 mm (range 92.7–121.6 mm). The mean number of intersections of CST by catheter was 2.2 (range 0–3) and the mean intersecting length was 18.9 mm (range 0–44.2 mm). The first 9 infusions in the highest dose level (range 3.84–4.54 ml infusate) were analyzed for Vd overlap with CST. In this group, the mean age was 7.6 years (range 5.8–10.3 years), the mean trajectory length was 109.5 mm (range 102.6–122.3 mm), and the mean overlap between Vd and CST was 5.5 cm3. For catheter placement–related adverse events, 1 patient (3%) had worsening of a contralateral facial nerve palsy following the procedure with two CST intersections, an intersecting distance of 31.7 mm, and an overlap between Vd and CST of 3.64 cm3. For infusion-related adverse events, transient postinfusion deficits were noted in 3 patients in the highest dose level, with a mean number of 2 intersections of CST by catheter, mean intersecting length of 12.9 mm, and mean overlap between Vd and CST of 6.3 cm3.CONCLUSIONSA supratentorial approach to the brainstem crossing the CST resulted in one worsened neurological deficit. There does not appear to be a significant risk requiring avoidance of dominant motor fiber tracts with catheter trajectory planning. There was no correlation between Vd–CST overlap and neurological adverse events in this cohort.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01502917 (clinicaltrials.gov)