The study was performed to compare the bioavailability of two quetiapine 25 mg tablet formulations: the test formulation was quetiapine fumarate (kitapen®) manufactured by Cobalt Pharmaceuticals, Canada/ Arrow Farmacêutica Ltda* (Erowlabs). Seroquel® (quetiapine) from Astrazeneca Brazil was used as reference formulation. The study was conducted open with randomized two period crossover design and one week wash out period in 64 volunteers of both sexes. Plasma samples were obtained over a 48 hour interval. Quetiapine was analyzed by LC-MS-MS in the presence of quetiapine-D8 as internal standard. Plasma samples were obtained over a 48 hour interval. Quetiapine was analyzed by LC-MS-MS in the presence of quetiapine-D8 as internal standard. The mean ratio of parameters Cmax and AUC 0-t and 90% confidence intervals of correspondents were calculated to determine the bioequivalence. The means AUC 0-t for test and reference formulation were 432.41 ng.h/mL and 412.20 ng.h/mL, for AUC 0-∞ were 440.06 ng.h/mL and 418.90 ng.h/mL and, for Cmax 126.94 ng/mL and 108.71 ng/mL, respectively. Geometric mean of quetiapine (kitapen®)/Seroquel® 25 mg individual percent ratio was 97.68% AUC 0-t , 97.47% for AUC 0-∞ and 90.68% for C max. The 90% confidence intervals were 92.67-102.96%, 92.53-102.67%, 83.37-98.64%, respectively. Since the 90% confidence intervals for C max , AUC 0-t and AUC 0-∞ were within the 80-125% interval proposed by Food and Drug Administration, it was concluded that quetiapine (kitapen®) 25 mg tablet was bioequivalent to Seroquel® 25 mg tablet according to both the rate and extent of absorption.
A new automated SPE-LC-ESI-MS/MS method was developed and validated to quantify venlafaxine in human plasma using fluoxetine as an internal standard. The analytes were automatically extracted from plasma by C18 SPE cartridges, separated on a C8 RP column and analyzed by MS in the multiple reaction-monitoring (MRM) mode. The method has a chromatographic run time of 4.0 min and a linear calibration curve over the range of 0.25-200 ng/mL (r >0.997). The between-run precisions, based on the percent RSD for replicate quality controls (0.75; 80, and 200 ng/mL), were < 8.5% for all concentrations. The between-run accuracies, based on the percent relative error, were < 4.0%. This method was successfully employed in a bioequivalence study of two venlafaxine capsule formulations (test formulation from Eurofarma (Brazil) and Efexor XR, reference formulation, from Wyeth-Whitehall, Brazil) in 48 healthy volunteers of both sexes who received a single 150 mg dose of each formulation. More than 3000 samples were analyzed eliminating the analyst's exposure to hazardous organic solvents normally employed in off-line liquid-liquid extractions. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the individual ratio geometric mean for Test/Reference was 91.6-103.4% for AUC(0-48 h) and 102.2-112.6% for C(max). Since both 90% CI for AUC(0-48 h) and C(max) were included in the 80-125% interval proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), the test formulation was considered bioequivalent to Efexor XR according to both the rate and extent of absorption.
We have developed and validated a fast and sensitive ultra high-performance liquid chromatography with positive ion electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry method for determining N-butylscopolamine levels in human plasma using propranolol as an internal standard. The acquisition was set up in the multiple reaction monitoring mode with the transitions m/z 360.3 → 138.0 for N-butylscopolamine and m/z 260.2 → 116.1 for IS. This method uses a liquid-liquid extraction process with dichloromethane. The analyte and IS were chromatographed on a C , 50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm column through isocratic elution with acetonitrile-5 mm ammonium acetate (adjusted to pH 3.0 with formic acid). The method was linear in the 1-1000 pg/mL range for N-butylscopolamine and was selective, precise, accurate and robust. The validated method was successfully applied to perform a bioequivalence study of the reference (Buscopan , from Boehringer Ingelheim) and the test sample coated-tablet formulations (from Foundation for Popular Remedy), both containing 10 mg of N-butylscopolamine bromide administered as a single dose. Using 58 healthy volunteers and accounting for the high intra-individual variability confirmed by statistical calculations (38%), the two formulations were considered bioequivalent because the rate and extent of absorption (within 80-125% interval), satisfying international requirements.
publicado na web em 26/08/2016A specific LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for automated determination of codeine in human plasma, using online solid phase extraction (SPE) system coupled with positive ion electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. The method allowed plasma direct injection onto cartridge without sample pre-treatment. Total analysis time per run was 3 min, allowing highthroughput for codeine determination. SPE on-line along a monolithic column (Chromolith Performance RP-18e, 100 mm x 4.6 mm) demonstrated to be highly effective in terms of backpressure, separation speed and peak asymmetry. Calibration curves range was linear 5.0-200 ng mL -1 . Method showed an excellent intra-day and inter-day precision ranged from 2.34 to 7.25% (CV%) as well as great intra-day and inter-day accuracy, ranging from 97.64 to 110% (RE%). SPE-LC-MS/MS method provided selectivity, accuracy, precision, fastness and high-throughput to assess codeine pharmacokinetics in human plasma samples.
Aqueous humor moxifloxacin concentrations were higher when topically administrated in combination with dexamethasone compared to the moxifloxacin alone. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Nevertheless, the MICs of the most common pathogens associated with endophthalmitis were exceeded in both study groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.