McSorley, Eugene, Patrick Haggard, and Robin Walker. Time course of oculomotor inhibition revealed by saccade trajectory modulation. J Neurophysiol 96: 1420 -1424. First published April 19, 2006 doi:10.1152/jn.00315.2006. Selecting a stimulus as the target for a goal-directed movement involves inhibiting other competing possible responses. Both target and distractor stimuli activate populations of neurons in topographic oculomotor maps such as the superior colliculus. Local inhibitory interconnections between these populations ensure only one saccade target is selected. Suppressing saccades to distractors may additionally involve inhibiting corresponding map regions to bias the local competition. Behavioral evidence of these inhibitory processes comes from the effects of distractors on oculomotor and manual trajectories. Individual saccades may initially deviate either toward or away from a distractor, but the source of this variability has not been investigated. Here we investigate the relation between distractor-related deviation of trajectory and saccade latency. Targets were presented with, or without, distractors, and the deviation of saccade trajectories arising from the presence of distractors was measured. A fixation gap paradigm was used to manipulate latency independently of the influence of competing distractors. Shorter-latency saccades deviated toward distractors and longer-latency saccades deviated away from distractors. The transition between deviation toward or away from distractors occurred at a saccade latency of around 200 ms. This shows that the time course of the inhibitory process involved in distractor related suppression is relatively slow.

SummaryDecision strategies in multi‐attribute choice experiments are investigated using eye‐tracking. The visual attention towards, and attendance of, attributes is examined. Stated attendance is found to diverge substantively from visual attendance of attributes. However, stated and visual attendance are shown to be informative, non‐overlapping sources of information about respondent utility functions when incorporated into model estimation. Eye‐tracking also reveals systematic nonattendance of attributes only by a minority of respondents. Most respondents visually attend most attributes most of the time. We find no compelling evidence that the level of attention is related to respondent certainty, or that higher or lower value attributes receive more or less attention. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

No abstract

The trajectories of saccadic eye movements can be modulated by the presence of a competing visual distractor. In the present study the trajectories of vertical saccades curved away from a single visual distractor presented in one visual field, but tended to be straight when two distractors were presented at mirror symmetric locations in both visual fields. The spatial nature of the mirror distractor effect was examined by presenting a second distractor at mirror and non-mirror locations. Saccade trajectories also tended to be straight with both mirror and non-mirror symmetrical distractors. The relationship between the distractor location and saccade curvature was examined in a third experiment by manipulating the distractor-to-target spatial separation. Although there was a tendency for greater curvature when the distractor was presented in the same hemifield as the target there was no clear relationship between curvature and distractor location. The results show that the distractor modulation of saccade trajectory is not highly spatially specific and that it can be balanced by a second bilateral distractor in the opposite visual field. The results are interpreted in terms of a model in which the initial saccade direction and curvature back towards the saccade goal are controlled by separate processes. Initial saccade direction is modulated by the inhibition of distractor locations within a 'motor map' specifying saccade direction. Curvature back towards the saccade goal may be attributed to a feedback system, with a separate representation of the visual target location, that enables an on-line correction of the saccade during mid-flight.

Models of perceptual decision making often assume that sensory evidence is accumulated over time in favor of the various possible decisions, until the evidence in favor of one of them outweighs the evidence for the others. Saccadic eye movements are among the most frequent perceptual decisions that the human brain performs. We used stochastic visual stimuli to identify the temporal impulse response underlying saccadic eye movement decisions. Observers performed a contrast search task, with temporal variability in the visual signals. In experiment 1, we derived the temporal filter observers used to integrate the visual information. The integration window was restricted to the first ϳ100 ms after display onset. In experiment 2, we showed that observers cannot perform the task if there is no useful information to distinguish the target from the distractor within this time epoch. We conclude that (1) observers did not integrate sensory evidence up to a criterion level, (2) observers did not integrate visual information up to the start of the saccadic dead time, and (3) variability in saccade latency does not correspond to variability in the visual integration period. Instead, our results support a temporal filter model of saccadic decision making. The temporal impulse response identified by our methods corresponds well with estimates of integration times of V1 output neurons.

We report four experiments with search displays of Gabor patches. Our aim was to study the accuracy of gaze control in search tasks. In Experiment 1, a target was presented with a single distractor Gabor of a different spatial frequency on the same axis. Subjects could locate the target with the first saccade if the distractor was more distant, but when the distractor was between the fixation point and the target, the first saccade landed much closer to the distractor. In Experiment 2, the number of display items was increased to 16 in a double ring configuration. With this configuration, first saccades were accurately directed to the target, even when there was an intervening distractor in exactly the same configuration as in Experiment 1. Experiment 3 suggested that the improvement in accuracy was not due to distractor homogeneity but rather may be attributable to the increased first saccade latency with the ring configuration. In the final experiment, latency was shown to covary with saccade accuracy. The results are related to a general framework whereby the presence of distractors operates to hold fixation for a longer period of time, thus allowing a greater period of visual processing and more accurate eye movements.

We characterised the impact of spatial frequency and contrast on saccade latencies to single Gabor patches. Saccade latencies decreased as a function of contrast, and increased with spatial frequency. The observed latency variations are qualitatively similar to those observed for manual reaction times. For single target detection, our findings highlight the similarity in the visual processes that support both saccadic and manual responses.

Saccadic eye movements and fixations are the behavioral means by which we visually sample text during reading. Human oculomotor control is governed by a complex neurophysiological system involving the brain stem, superior colliculus, and several cortical areas. A very widely held belief among researchers investigating primate vision is that the oculomotor system serves to orient the visual axes of both eyes to fixate the same target point in space. It is argued that such precise positioning of the eyes is necessary to place images on corresponding retinal locations, such that on each fixation a single, nondiplopic, visual representation is perceived. Vision works actively through a continual sampling process involving saccades and fixations. Here we report that during normal reading, the eyes do not always fixate the same letter within a word. We also demonstrate that saccadic targeting is yoked and based on a unified cyclopean percept of a whole word since it is unaffected if different word parts are delivered exclusively to each eye via a dichoptic presentation technique. These two findings together suggest that the visual signal from each eye is fused at a very early stage in the visual pathway, even when the fixation disparity is greater than one character (0.29 deg), and that saccade metrics for each eye are computed on the basis of that fused signal.