Purpose: This trial evaluated the safety, clinical activity, and immunogenicity of an allogeneic cellular immunotherapy in 55 chemotherapy-naI« ve patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The immunotherapy, based on the GVAX platform, is a combination of two prostate carcinoma cell lines modified with the granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) gene. Experimental Design: HRPC patients with radiologic metastases (n = 34) or rising prostatespecific antigen (PSA) only (n = 21) received a prime dose of 500 million cells and 12 boost doses of either100 million cells (low dose) or 300 million cells (high dose) biweekly for 6 months. End points were changes in PSA, time to progression, and survival. Results: Median survival was 26.2 months (95% confidence interval, 17, 36) in the radiologic group: 34.9 months (8, 57) after treatment with the high dose (n = 10) of immunotherapy and 24.0 months (11, 35) with the low dose (n = 24).The median time to bone scan progression in the radiologic group was 5.0 months (2.6, 11.6) with the high dose and 2.8 months (2.8, 5.7) with the low dose. In the rising-PSA group (n = 21) receiving the low dose, the median time to bone scan progression was 5.9 months (5.6, not reached), and median survival was 37.5 months (29, 56). No dose-limiting or autoimmune toxicities were seen; the most common adverse events were injection site reaction and fatigue. Conclusions: These results suggest that this GM-CSF^secreting, allogeneic cellular immunotherapy is well tolerated and may have clinical activity in patients with metastatic HRPC. Phase 3 trials to confirm these results are under way.Approximately 27,050 men die annually from metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC; ref. 1). Although chemotherapy with docetaxel has been shown to prolong survival in HRPC (2, 3), alternatives to chemotherapy remain of considerable interest to many patients and physicians. Recent advances in the understanding of cancer immunology have led to the development of new cancer treatments specifically designed to stimulate the patient's immune system. Although prostate cancer has traditionally been thought of as poorly immunogenic, numerous studies have shown that tumor tolerance can be reversed (4 -6). Prostate cancer is a good target for immunotherapy due to the typically slow growth rate of most prostate tumor cells, which in turn permits an appropriately stimulated immune system time to mount antitumor responses (4, 5).Immunotherapy typically involves presenting one or more tumor antigens to the patient's immune system in vivo or to harvested immune cells in vitro (4, 6). An immune system stimulant may be included in the treatment to enhance the immune response to the antigens. Whole tumor cells have been proposed as an antigen source in immunotherapy because relevant prostate cancer tumor-rejection antigens have not been convincingly identified, and a polyvalent source of antigens can better address ''antigen escape'' resulting from the modulation and down-reg...

No abstract

To our knowledge this study is the first to evaluate rofecoxib versus placebo in patients with prostatitis and the first large multicenter treatment study to use the NIH-CPSI. Subjective assessment with patient global questions may be more sensitive to change than the NIH-CPSI and, therefore, may be a better tool to use in future therapeutic trials. Although 6 weeks of rofecoxib treatment appear to benefit many men diagnosed with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome further studies are needed.

No abstract

This study demonstrated that vardenafil had no adverse effects on sperm concentration, compared with sildenafil and placebo, when administered daily at the maximum recommended dose for 6 months. Specifically, use of vardenafil for 6 months does not impair sperm concentration, total sperm count per ejaculate, or sperm morphology and motility. Levels of reproductive hormones were also unaffected.

This prospective trial shows the onset of efficacy of tadalafil 2.5 and 5 mg once daily within a few days of initiating therapy.

One hundred and nine subjects received placebo and 111 subjects received pregabalin. The difference between placebo and pregabalin with respect to the percentage of subjects with a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in sperm concentration at End of Study was 6% (95% CI: -2.29 to 14.3%). Noninferiority of pregabalin compared to placebo was declared as the upper bound of the 95% CI was less than the prespecified noninferiority margin of 20%. There were no significant differences between placebo and pregabalin groups with respect to their effects on FSH, testosterone, or sperm motility. Changes in semen volume and sperm morphology were numerically similar in both treatment groups. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of pregabalin. Treatment with 600 mg/day pregabalin for 12 weeks does not adversely affect spermatogenesis or serum levels of FSH and testosterone in healthy males.

No abstract