The Biofilm (BF) building capacity of different serotypes of
Salmonella enterica derived from the poultry farm environment was investigated. Starting point for the investigation was the question if farm‐isolated
Salmonella serotypes with high importance for poultry meat and egg production are capable of forming a BF under defined laboratory conditions. Several isolates from different stages of the production cycle were chosen and compared to laboratory grown strains of the same serotype. BF building capacity was analyzed in a 96‐well format during a time period of 2 days. Pulse field gel electrophoresis was used to establish a relationship between different isolates. The BF building capacity of a monospecies BF was strongly dependent on the temperature used for incubation. Results indicated further that certain farm isolates were capable of forming BF under laboratory conditions, whereas laboratory grown strains were not. Considerable differences between different field serovars and within one serovar exist. In conclusion, the BF building capacity of poultry‐derived isolates is a function of adaptation to their host environment. Thus, the control of BF as a reservoir for
Salmonella in the farm environment is of crucial importance for the overall improvement of food safety. Mechanical and substance‐based approaches for this control exist in several variations, but overall decontamination success is difficult to achieve and needs to be especially adapted to the farm environment.
By adapting a very virulent fowl adenovirus serotype 4 (FAdV-4) to a fibroblast cell line (QT35) instead of growing the virus in chicken embryo liver cells or chicken kidney cells, it was possible to attenuate the virus. Birds infected with the attenuated virus (FAdV-4/QT35) on the first day of life expressed no adverse clinical signs and no mortality. Intramuscular challenge with the virulent virus grown on chicken embryo liver cells (FAdV-4/CEL) at 21 days of life induced high mortality in previously nonvaccinated birds, whereas none of the birds vaccinated at 1 day old with FAdV-4/QT35 died due to this challenge. Applying enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and virus neutralization assay, only a weak antibody response could be detected in some birds following vaccination, a response that increased directly after challenge. Nonvaccinated birds displayed a delayed development of antibodies after challenge as compared to previously vaccinated birds. Even birds that did not develop a measurable neutralizing antibody titer prior to challenge were protected from the adverse effects of the virulent FAdV-4/CEL, a phenomenon not described so far for FAdVs. Altogether, the present investigation underlines that neutralizing antibodies are not needed to protect chickens against a severe infection with a virulent fowl adenovirus.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.